Commit f7d6a237 authored by Paolo Abeni's avatar Paolo Abeni Committed by David S. Miller

mptcp: fix per socket endpoint accounting

Since full-mesh endpoint support, the reception of a single ADD_ADDR
option can cause multiple subflows creation. When such option is
accepted we increment 'add_addr_accepted' by one. When we received
a paired RM_ADDR option, we deleted all the relevant subflows,
decrementing 'add_addr_accepted' by one for each of them.

We have a similar issue for 'local_addr_used'

Fix them moving the pm endpoint accounting outside the subflow
traversal.

Fixes: 1a0d6136 ("mptcp: local addresses fullmesh")
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 05be5e27
......@@ -711,6 +711,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
return;
for (i = 0; i < rm_list->nr; i++) {
bool removed = false;
list_for_each_entry_safe(subflow, tmp, &msk->conn_list, node) {
struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
int how = RCV_SHUTDOWN | SEND_SHUTDOWN;
......@@ -730,15 +732,19 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow);
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
removed = true;
msk->pm.subflows--;
__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type);
}
if (!removed)
continue;
if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) {
msk->pm.add_addr_accepted--;
WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
} else if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW) {
msk->pm.local_addr_used--;
}
msk->pm.subflows--;
__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type);
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment