Commit f958cb03 authored by Will Deacon's avatar Will Deacon Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

nospec: Move array_index_nospec() parameter checking into separate macro

commit 8fa80c50 upstream.

For architectures providing their own implementation of
array_index_mask_nospec() in asm/barrier.h, attempting to use WARN_ONCE() to
complain about out-of-range parameters using WARN_ON() results in a mess
of mutually-dependent include files.

Rather than unpick the dependencies, simply have the core code in nospec.h
perform the checking for us.
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1517840166-15399-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent aa8f4fda
......@@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index,
unsigned long size)
{
/*
* Always calculate and emit the mask even if the compiler
* thinks the mask is not needed. The compiler does not take
* into account the value of @index under speculation.
*/
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(index);
return ~(long)(index | (size - 1UL - index)) >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
}
#endif
/*
* Warn developers about inappropriate array_index_nospec() usage.
*
* Even if the CPU speculates past the WARN_ONCE branch, the
......@@ -30,19 +40,15 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index,
* This warning is compiled out when the compiler can infer that
* @index and @size are less than LONG_MAX.
*/
if (WARN_ONCE(index > LONG_MAX || size > LONG_MAX,
"array_index_nospec() limited to range of [0, LONG_MAX]\n"))
return 0;
/*
* Always calculate and emit the mask even if the compiler
* thinks the mask is not needed. The compiler does not take
* into account the value of @index under speculation.
*/
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(index);
return ~(long)(index | (size - 1UL - index)) >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
}
#endif
#define array_index_mask_nospec_check(index, size) \
({ \
if (WARN_ONCE(index > LONG_MAX || size > LONG_MAX, \
"array_index_nospec() limited to range of [0, LONG_MAX]\n")) \
_mask = 0; \
else \
_mask = array_index_mask_nospec(index, size); \
_mask; \
})
/*
* array_index_nospec - sanitize an array index after a bounds check
......@@ -62,7 +68,7 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index,
({ \
typeof(index) _i = (index); \
typeof(size) _s = (size); \
unsigned long _mask = array_index_mask_nospec(_i, _s); \
unsigned long _mask = array_index_mask_nospec_check(_i, _s); \
\
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_i) > sizeof(long)); \
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_s) > sizeof(long)); \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment