Merge weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-base

into  weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-rt-merge

BUILD/SETUP.sh

@@ -138,3 +138,28 @@ then
   echo "$CC" | grep "ccache" > /dev/null || CC="ccache $CC"
   echo "$CXX" | grep "ccache" > /dev/null || CXX="ccache $CXX"
 fi
+
+# gcov
+
+# The  -fprofile-arcs and -ftest-coverage options cause GCC to instrument the
+# code with profiling information used by gcov.
+# The -DDISABLE_TAO_ASM is needed to avoid build failures in Yassl.
+# The -DHAVE_gcov enables code to write out coverage info even when crashing.
+
+gcov_compile_flags="-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"
+gcov_compile_flags="$gcov_compile_flags -DDISABLE_TAO_ASM"
+gcov_compile_flags="$gcov_compile_flags -DMYSQL_SERVER_SUFFIX=-gcov -DHAVE_gcov"
+
+# GCC4 needs -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage on the linker command line (as well
+# as on the compiler command line), and this requires setting LDFLAGS for BDB.
+
+gcov_link_flags="-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"
+
+gcov_configs="--disable-shared"
+
+# gprof
+
+gprof_compile_flags="-O2 -pg -g"
+
+gprof_link_flags="--disable-shared $static_link"
+

BUILD/compile-amd64-gcov

+#! /bin/sh
+
+path=`dirname $0`
+. "$path/SETUP.sh"
+
+# Need to disable ccache, or we loose the gcov-needed compiler output files.
+CCACHE_DISABLE=1
+export CCACHE_DISABLE
+
+export LDFLAGS="$gcov_link_flags"
+
+extra_flags="$amd64_cflags $debug_cflags $max_cflags $gcov_compile_flags"
+c_warnings="$c_warnings $debug_extra_warnings"
+cxx_warnings="$cxx_warnings $debug_extra_warnings"
+extra_configs="$amd64_configs $debug_configs $gcov_configs $max_configs"
+
+. "$path/FINISH.sh"

BUILD/compile-amd64-gprof

+#! /bin/sh
+
+path=`dirname $0`
+. "$path/SETUP.sh"
+
+extra_flags="$amd64_cflags $gprof_compile_flags"
+extra_configs="$amd64_configs $debug_configs $gprof_link_flags"
+
+. "$path/FINISH.sh"

BUILD/compile-pentium-gcov

@@ -7,18 +7,11 @@ path=`dirname $0`
 CCACHE_DISABLE=1
 export CCACHE_DISABLE
 
-# GCC4 needs -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage on the linker command line (as well
-# as on the compiler command line), and this requires setting LDFLAGS for BDB.
-export LDFLAGS="-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"
+export LDFLAGS="$gcov_link_flags"
 
-# The  -fprofile-arcs and -ftest-coverage options cause GCC to instrument the
-# code with profiling information used by gcov.
-# The -DDISABLE_TAO_ASM is needed to avoid build failures in Yassl.
-# The -DHAVE_gcov enables code to write out coverage info even when crashing.
-extra_flags="$pentium_cflags -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -DDISABLE_TAO_ASM $debug_cflags $max_cflags -DMYSQL_SERVER_SUFFIX=-gcov -DHAVE_gcov"
+extra_flags="$pentium_cflags $debug_cflags $max_cflags $gcov_compile_flags"
 c_warnings="$c_warnings $debug_extra_warnings"
 cxx_warnings="$cxx_warnings $debug_extra_warnings"
-extra_configs="$pentium_configs $debug_configs --disable-shared $static_link"
-extra_configs="$extra_configs $max_configs"
+extra_configs="$pentium_configs $debug_configs $gcov_configs $max_configs"
 
 . "$path/FINISH.sh"

BUILD/compile-pentium-gprof

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 path=`dirname $0`
 . "$path/SETUP.sh"
 
-extra_flags="$pentium_cflags -O2 -pg -g"
-extra_configs="$pentium_configs $debug_configs --disable-shared $static_link"
+extra_flags="$pentium_cflags $gprof_compile_flags"
+extra_configs="$pentium_configs $debug_configs $gprof_link_flags"
 
 . "$path/FINISH.sh"

BUILD/compile-pentium64-gcov

+#! /bin/sh
+
+path=`dirname $0`
+. "$path/SETUP.sh"
+
+# Need to disable ccache, or we loose the gcov-needed compiler output files.
+CCACHE_DISABLE=1
+export CCACHE_DISABLE
+
+export LDFLAGS="$gcov_link_flags"
+
+extra_flags="$pentium64_cflags $debug_cflags $max_cflags $gcov_compile_flags"
+c_warnings="$c_warnings $debug_extra_warnings"
+cxx_warnings="$cxx_warnings $debug_extra_warnings"
+extra_configs="$pentium64_configs $debug_configs $gcov_configs $max_configs"
+
+. "$path/FINISH.sh"

BUILD/compile-pentium64-gprof

+#! /bin/sh
+
+path=`dirname $0`
+. "$path/SETUP.sh"
+
+extra_flags="$pentium64_cflags $gprof_compile_flags"
+extra_configs="$pentium64_configs $debug_configs $gprof_link_flags"
+
+. "$path/FINISH.sh"

client/mysql.cc

@@ -1245,6 +1245,7 @@ static bool add_line(String &buffer,char *line,char *in_string,
   char buff[80], *pos, *out;
   COMMANDS *com;
   bool need_space= 0;
+  bool ss_comment= 0;
   DBUG_ENTER("add_line");
 
   if (!line[0] && buffer.is_empty())
@@ -1298,6 +1299,19 @@ static bool add_line(String &buffer,char *line,char *in_string,
         if ((*com->func)(&buffer,pos-1) > 0)
           DBUG_RETURN(1);                       // Quit
         if (com->takes_params)
+        {
+          if (ss_comment)
+          {
+            /*
+              If a client-side macro appears inside a server-side comment,
+              discard all characters in the comment after the macro (that is,
+              until the end of the comment rather than the next delimiter)
+            */
+            for (pos++; *pos && (*pos != '*' || *(pos + 1) != '/'); pos++)
+              ;
+            pos--;
+          }
+          else
           {
             for (pos++ ;
                  *pos && (*pos != *delimiter ||
@@ -1308,6 +1322,7 @@ static bool add_line(String &buffer,char *line,char *in_string,
             else 
               pos+= delimiter_length - 1; // Point at last delim char
           }
+        }
         out=line;
       }
       else
@@ -1368,7 +1383,7 @@ static bool add_line(String &buffer,char *line,char *in_string,
         out=line;
       }
     }
-    else if (*ml_comment && inchar == '*' && *(pos + 1) == '/')
+    else if (*ml_comment && !ss_comment && inchar == '*' && *(pos + 1) == '/')
     {
       pos++;
       *ml_comment= 0;
@@ -1376,6 +1391,11 @@ static bool add_line(String &buffer,char *line,char *in_string,
     }      
     else
     {						// Add found char to buffer
+      if (!*in_string && inchar == '/' && *(pos + 1) == '*' &&
+          *(pos + 2) == '!')
+        ss_comment= 1;
+      else if (!*in_string && ss_comment && inchar == '*' && *(pos + 1) == '/')
+        ss_comment= 0;
       if (inchar == *in_string)
 	*in_string= 0;
       else if (!*ml_comment && !*in_string &&

mysql-test/r/comments.result

@@ -26,3 +26,18 @@ select 1 # The rest of the row will be ignored
 1
 1
 /* line with only comment */;
+drop table if exists table_28779;
+create table table_28779 (a int);
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*' AND b = 'bar';";
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '/*' AND b = 'bar'' at line 1
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*' AND b = 'bar';*";
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '/*' AND b = 'bar';*' at line 1
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*! AND 2=2;";
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*! AND 2=2;*";
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ';*' at line 1
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*!98765' AND b = 'bar';";
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '/*!98765' AND b = 'bar'' at line 1
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*!98765' AND b = 'bar';*";
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '/*!98765' AND b = 'bar';*' at line 1
+drop table table_28779;

mysql-test/r/handler.result

@@ -489,3 +489,16 @@ handler t1 open;
 ERROR HY000: Table storage engine for 't1' doesn't have this option
 --> client 1
 drop table t1;
+drop table if exists t1;
+create table t1 (a int);
+handler t1 open as t1_alias;
+handler t1_alias read a next;
+ERROR HY000: Key 'a' doesn't exist in table 't1_alias'
+handler t1_alias READ a next where inexistent > 0;
+ERROR 42S22: Unknown column 'inexistent' in 'field list'
+handler t1_alias read a next;
+ERROR HY000: Key 'a' doesn't exist in table 't1_alias'
+handler t1_alias READ a next where inexistent > 0;
+ERROR 42S22: Unknown column 'inexistent' in 'field list'
+handler t1_alias close;
+drop table t1;

mysql-test/r/innodb-deadlock.result

@@ -94,3 +94,14 @@ id	x
 300	300
 commit;
 drop table t1, t2;
+End of 4.1 tests
+set storage_engine=innodb;
+drop table if exists a;
+drop table if exists A;
+create table A (c int);
+insert into A (c) values (0);
+create table a as select * from A;
+drop table A;
+drop table if exists a;
+set storage_engine=default;
+End of 5.0 tests.

mysql-test/r/mysql.result

@@ -176,4 +176,6 @@ ERROR at line 1: DELIMITER cannot contain a backslash character
 ERROR at line 1: DELIMITER cannot contain a backslash character
 1
 1
+1
+1
 End of 5.0 tests

mysql-test/r/parser_precedence.result

+drop table if exists t1_30237_bool;
+create table t1_30237_bool(A boolean, B boolean, C boolean);
+insert into t1_30237_bool values
+(FALSE, FALSE, FALSE),
+(FALSE, FALSE, NULL),
+(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE),
+(FALSE, NULL, FALSE),
+(FALSE, NULL, NULL),
+(FALSE, NULL, TRUE),
+(FALSE, TRUE, FALSE),
+(FALSE, TRUE, NULL),
+(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE),
+(NULL, FALSE, FALSE),
+(NULL, FALSE, NULL),
+(NULL, FALSE, TRUE),
+(NULL, NULL, FALSE),
+(NULL, NULL, NULL),
+(NULL, NULL, TRUE),
+(NULL, TRUE, FALSE),
+(NULL, TRUE, NULL),
+(NULL, TRUE, TRUE),
+(TRUE, FALSE, FALSE),
+(TRUE, FALSE, NULL),
+(TRUE, FALSE, TRUE),
+(TRUE, NULL, FALSE),
+(TRUE, NULL, NULL),
+(TRUE, NULL, TRUE),
+(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE),
+(TRUE, TRUE, NULL),
+(TRUE, TRUE, TRUE) ;
+Testing OR, XOR, AND
+select A, B, A OR B, A XOR B, A AND B
+from t1_30237_bool where C is null order by A, B;
+A	B	A OR B	A XOR B	A AND B
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	0
+NULL	1	1	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	0
+0	0	0	0	0
+0	1	1	1	0
+1	NULL	1	NULL	NULL
+1	0	1	1	0
+1	1	1	0	1
+Testing that OR is associative 
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) OR C, A OR (B OR C), A OR B OR C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A OR B) OR C	A OR (B OR C)	A OR B OR C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	1	1	1	1
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	1	1	1	1
+NULL	1	NULL	1	1	1
+NULL	1	0	1	1	1
+NULL	1	1	1	1	1
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	1	1	1	1
+0	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	1	1	1
+0	1	NULL	1	1	1
+0	1	0	1	1	1
+0	1	1	1	1	1
+1	NULL	NULL	1	1	1
+1	NULL	0	1	1	1
+1	NULL	1	1	1	1
+1	0	NULL	1	1	1
+1	0	0	1	1	1
+1	0	1	1	1	1
+1	1	NULL	1	1	1
+1	1	0	1	1	1
+1	1	1	1	1	1
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where ((A OR B) OR C) != (A OR (B OR C));
+count(*)
+0
+Testing that XOR is associative 
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) XOR C, A XOR (B XOR C), A XOR B XOR C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A XOR B) XOR C	A XOR (B XOR C)	A XOR B XOR C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	1	1	1
+0	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	1	0	1	1	1
+0	1	1	0	0	0
+1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	0	0	1	1	1
+1	0	1	0	0	0
+1	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	1	0	0	0	0
+1	1	1	1	1	1
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where ((A XOR B) XOR C) != (A XOR (B XOR C));
+count(*)
+0
+Testing that AND is associative 
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) AND C, A AND (B AND C), A AND B AND C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A AND B) AND C	A AND (B AND C)	A AND B AND C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	0	0	0
+NULL	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	NULL	0	0	0
+NULL	0	0	0	0	0
+NULL	0	1	0	0	0
+NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	0	0	0	0
+NULL	1	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	NULL	0	0	0
+0	NULL	0	0	0	0
+0	NULL	1	0	0	0
+0	0	NULL	0	0	0
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	0	0	0
+0	1	NULL	0	0	0
+0	1	0	0	0	0
+0	1	1	0	0	0
+1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	0	0	0	0
+1	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	0	NULL	0	0	0
+1	0	0	0	0	0
+1	0	1	0	0	0
+1	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	1	0	0	0	0
+1	1	1	1	1	1
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where ((A AND B) AND C) != (A AND (B AND C));
+count(*)
+0
+Testing that AND has precedence over OR
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) AND C, A OR (B AND C), A OR B AND C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A OR B) AND C	A OR (B AND C)	A OR B AND C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	0	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	0	0	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	0	0	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	1	1	1	1
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	0	0	0	0
+0	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	0	NULL	0	0	0
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	0	0	0
+0	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	1	0	0	0	0
+0	1	1	1	1	1
+1	NULL	NULL	NULL	1	1
+1	NULL	0	0	1	1
+1	NULL	1	1	1	1
+1	0	NULL	NULL	1	1
+1	0	0	0	1	1
+1	0	1	1	1	1
+1	1	NULL	NULL	1	1
+1	1	0	0	1	1
+1	1	1	1	1	1
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where (A OR (B AND C)) != (A OR B AND C);
+count(*)
+0
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) OR C, A AND (B OR C), A AND B OR C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A AND B) OR C	A AND (B OR C)	A AND B OR C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	1	1	NULL	1
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	0	0	0	0
+NULL	0	1	1	NULL	1
+NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	1	1	NULL	1
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	0	NULL
+0	NULL	0	0	0	0
+0	NULL	1	1	0	1
+0	0	NULL	NULL	0	NULL
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	1	0	1
+0	1	NULL	NULL	0	NULL
+0	1	0	0	0	0
+0	1	1	1	0	1
+1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	1	1	1	1
+1	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	0	0	0	0	0
+1	0	1	1	1	1
+1	1	NULL	1	1	1
+1	1	0	1	1	1
+1	1	1	1	1	1
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where ((A AND B) OR C) != (A AND B OR C);
+count(*)
+0
+Testing that AND has precedence over XOR
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) AND C, A XOR (B AND C), A XOR B AND C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A XOR B) AND C	A XOR (B AND C)	A XOR B AND C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	0	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	0	0	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	0	0	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	0	0	0	0
+0	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	0	NULL	0	0	0
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	0	0	0
+0	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	1	0	0	0	0
+0	1	1	1	1	1
+1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	0	0	1	1
+1	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	0	NULL	NULL	1	1
+1	0	0	0	1	1
+1	0	1	1	1	1
+1	1	NULL	0	NULL	NULL
+1	1	0	0	1	1
+1	1	1	0	0	0
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where (A XOR (B AND C)) != (A XOR B AND C);
+count(*)
+0
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) XOR C, A AND (B XOR C), A AND B XOR C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A AND B) XOR C	A AND (B XOR C)	A AND B XOR C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	0	0	0	0
+NULL	0	1	1	NULL	1
+NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	1	NULL	0	NULL
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	0	NULL
+0	NULL	0	0	0	0
+0	NULL	1	1	0	1
+0	0	NULL	NULL	0	NULL
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	1	0	1
+0	1	NULL	NULL	0	NULL
+0	1	0	0	0	0
+0	1	1	1	0	1
+1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	0	0	0	0	0
+1	0	1	1	1	1
+1	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	1	0	1	1	1
+1	1	1	0	0	0
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where ((A AND B) XOR C) != (A AND B XOR C);
+count(*)
+0
+Testing that XOR has precedence over OR
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) OR C, A XOR (B OR C), A XOR B OR C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A XOR B) OR C	A XOR (B OR C)	A XOR B OR C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	1	1	NULL	1
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	1	1	NULL	1
+NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	1	1	NULL	1
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	1	1	1	1
+0	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	1	1	1
+0	1	NULL	1	1	1
+0	1	0	1	1	1
+0	1	1	1	1	1
+1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+1	NULL	1	1	0	1
+1	0	NULL	1	NULL	1
+1	0	0	1	1	1
+1	0	1	1	0	1
+1	1	NULL	NULL	0	NULL
+1	1	0	0	0	0
+1	1	1	1	0	1
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where ((A XOR B) OR C) != (A XOR B OR C);
+count(*)
+0
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) XOR C, A OR (B XOR C), A OR B XOR C
+from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+A	B	C	(A OR B) XOR C	A OR (B XOR C)	A OR B XOR C
+NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	0	1	NULL	1	1
+NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+NULL	1	0	1	1	1
+NULL	1	1	0	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	0	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	NULL	1	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	0	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	0	0	0	0	0
+0	0	1	1	1	1
+0	1	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL
+0	1	0	1	1	1
+0	1	1	0	0	0
+1	NULL	NULL	NULL	1	1
+1	NULL	0	1	1	1
+1	NULL	1	0	1	1
+1	0	NULL	NULL	1	1
+1	0	0	1	1	1
+1	0	1	0	1	1
+1	1	NULL	NULL	1	1
+1	1	0	1	1	1
+1	1	1	0	1	1
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+where (A OR (B XOR C)) != (A OR B XOR C);
+count(*)
+0
+drop table t1_30237_bool;
+Testing that NOT has precedence over OR
+select (NOT FALSE) OR TRUE, NOT (FALSE OR TRUE), NOT FALSE OR TRUE;
+(NOT FALSE) OR TRUE	NOT (FALSE OR TRUE)	NOT FALSE OR TRUE
+1	0	1
+Testing that NOT has precedence over XOR
+select (NOT FALSE) XOR FALSE, NOT (FALSE XOR FALSE), NOT FALSE XOR FALSE;
+(NOT FALSE) XOR FALSE	NOT (FALSE XOR FALSE)	NOT FALSE XOR FALSE
+1	1	1
+Testing that NOT has precedence over AND
+select (NOT FALSE) AND FALSE, NOT (FALSE AND FALSE), NOT FALSE AND FALSE;
+(NOT FALSE) AND FALSE	NOT (FALSE AND FALSE)	NOT FALSE AND FALSE
+0	1	0
+Testing that NOT is associative
+select NOT NOT TRUE, NOT NOT NOT FALSE;
+NOT NOT TRUE	NOT NOT NOT FALSE
+1	1
+Testing that IS has precedence over NOT
+select (NOT NULL) IS TRUE, NOT (NULL IS TRUE), NOT NULL IS TRUE;
+(NOT NULL) IS TRUE	NOT (NULL IS TRUE)	NOT NULL IS TRUE
+0	1	1
+select (NOT NULL) IS NOT TRUE, NOT (NULL IS NOT TRUE), NOT NULL IS NOT TRUE;
+(NOT NULL) IS NOT TRUE	NOT (NULL IS NOT TRUE)	NOT NULL IS NOT TRUE
+1	0	0
+select (NOT NULL) IS FALSE, NOT (NULL IS FALSE), NOT NULL IS FALSE;
+(NOT NULL) IS FALSE	NOT (NULL IS FALSE)	NOT NULL IS FALSE
+0	1	1
+select (NOT NULL) IS NOT FALSE, NOT (NULL IS NOT FALSE), NOT NULL IS NOT FALSE;
+(NOT NULL) IS NOT FALSE	NOT (NULL IS NOT FALSE)	NOT NULL IS NOT FALSE
+1	0	0
+select (NOT TRUE) IS UNKNOWN, NOT (TRUE IS UNKNOWN), NOT TRUE IS UNKNOWN;
+(NOT TRUE) IS UNKNOWN	NOT (TRUE IS UNKNOWN)	NOT TRUE IS UNKNOWN
+0	1	1
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NOT UNKNOWN, NOT (TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN), NOT TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN;
+(NOT TRUE) IS NOT UNKNOWN	NOT (TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN)	NOT TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN
+1	0	0
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NULL, NOT (TRUE IS NULL), NOT TRUE IS NULL;
+(NOT TRUE) IS NULL	NOT (TRUE IS NULL)	NOT TRUE IS NULL
+0	1	1
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NOT NULL, NOT (TRUE IS NOT NULL), NOT TRUE IS NOT NULL;
+(NOT TRUE) IS NOT NULL	NOT (TRUE IS NOT NULL)	NOT TRUE IS NOT NULL
+1	0	0
+Testing that IS [NOT] TRUE/FALSE/UNKNOWN predicates are not associative
+select TRUE IS TRUE IS TRUE IS TRUE;
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'IS TRUE IS TRUE' at line 1
+select FALSE IS NOT TRUE IS NOT TRUE IS NOT TRUE;
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'IS NOT TRUE IS NOT TRUE' at line 1
+select NULL IS FALSE IS FALSE IS FALSE;
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'IS FALSE IS FALSE' at line 1
+select TRUE IS NOT FALSE IS NOT FALSE IS NOT FALSE;
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'IS NOT FALSE IS NOT FALSE' at line 1
+select FALSE IS UNKNOWN IS UNKNOWN IS UNKNOWN;
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'IS UNKNOWN IS UNKNOWN' at line 1
+select TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN IS NOT UNKNOWN IS NOT UNKNOWN;
+ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'IS NOT UNKNOWN IS NOT UNKNOWN' at line 1
+Testing that IS [NOT] NULL predicates are associative
+select FALSE IS NULL IS NULL IS NULL;
+FALSE IS NULL IS NULL IS NULL
+0
+select TRUE IS NOT NULL IS NOT NULL IS NOT NULL;
+TRUE IS NOT NULL IS NOT NULL IS NOT NULL
+1
+Testing that comparison operators are left associative
+select 1 <=> 2 <=> 2, (1 <=> 2) <=> 2, 1 <=> (2 <=> 2);
+1 <=> 2 <=> 2	(1 <=> 2) <=> 2	1 <=> (2 <=> 2)
+0	0	1
+select 1 = 2 = 2, (1 = 2) = 2, 1 = (2 = 2);
+1 = 2 = 2	(1 = 2) = 2	1 = (2 = 2)
+0	0	1
+select 1 != 2 != 3, (1 != 2) != 3, 1 != (2 != 3);
+1 != 2 != 3	(1 != 2) != 3	1 != (2 != 3)
+1	1	0
+select 1 <> 2 <> 3, (1 <> 2) <> 3, 1 <> (2 <> 3);
+1 <> 2 <> 3	(1 <> 2) <> 3	1 <> (2 <> 3)
+1	1	0
+select 1 < 2 < 3, (1 < 2) < 3, 1 < (2 < 3);
+1 < 2 < 3	(1 < 2) < 3	1 < (2 < 3)
+1	1	0
+select 3 <= 2 <= 1, (3 <= 2) <= 1, 3 <= (2 <= 1);
+3 <= 2 <= 1	(3 <= 2) <= 1	3 <= (2 <= 1)
+1	1	0
+select 1 > 2 > 3, (1 > 2) > 3, 1 > (2 > 3);
+1 > 2 > 3	(1 > 2) > 3	1 > (2 > 3)
+0	0	1
+select 1 >= 2 >= 3, (1 >= 2) >= 3, 1 >= (2 >= 3);
+1 >= 2 >= 3	(1 >= 2) >= 3	1 >= (2 >= 3)
+0	0	1
+Testing that | is associative
+select 0xF0 | 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 | 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 | (0x0F | 0x55);
+0xF0 | 0x0F | 0x55	(0xF0 | 0x0F) | 0x55	0xF0 | (0x0F | 0x55)
+255	255	255
+Testing that & is associative
+select 0xF5 & 0x5F & 0x55, (0xF5 & 0x5F) & 0x55, 0xF5 & (0x5F & 0x55);
+0xF5 & 0x5F & 0x55	(0xF5 & 0x5F) & 0x55	0xF5 & (0x5F & 0x55)
+85	85	85
+Testing that << is left associative
+select 4 << 3 << 2, (4 << 3) << 2, 4 << (3 << 2);
+4 << 3 << 2	(4 << 3) << 2	4 << (3 << 2)
+128	128	16384
+Testing that >> is left associative
+select 256 >> 3 >> 2, (256 >> 3) >> 2, 256 >> (3 >> 2);
+256 >> 3 >> 2	(256 >> 3) >> 2	256 >> (3 >> 2)
+8	8	256
+Testing that & has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 & 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 & 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 & (0x0F | 0x55);
+0xF0 & 0x0F | 0x55	(0xF0 & 0x0F) | 0x55	0xF0 & (0x0F | 0x55)
+85	85	80
+select 0x55 | 0xF0 & 0x0F, (0x55 | 0xF0) & 0x0F, 0x55 | (0xF0 & 0x0F);
+0x55 | 0xF0 & 0x0F	(0x55 | 0xF0) & 0x0F	0x55 | (0xF0 & 0x0F)
+85	5	85
+Testing that << has precedence over |
+select 0x0F << 4 | 0x0F, (0x0F << 4) | 0x0F, 0x0F << (4 | 0x0F);
+0x0F << 4 | 0x0F	(0x0F << 4) | 0x0F	0x0F << (4 | 0x0F)
+255	255	491520
+select 0x0F | 0x0F << 4, (0x0F | 0x0F) << 4, 0x0F | (0x0F << 4);
+0x0F | 0x0F << 4	(0x0F | 0x0F) << 4	0x0F | (0x0F << 4)
+255	240	255
+Testing that >> has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 >> 4 | 0xFF, (0xF0 >> 4) | 0xFF, 0xF0 >> (4 | 0xFF);
+0xF0 >> 4 | 0xFF	(0xF0 >> 4) | 0xFF	0xF0 >> (4 | 0xFF)
+255	255	0
+select 0xFF | 0xF0 >> 4, (0xFF | 0xF0) >> 4, 0xFF | (0xF0 >> 4);
+0xFF | 0xF0 >> 4	(0xFF | 0xF0) >> 4	0xFF | (0xF0 >> 4)
+255	15	255
+Testing that << has precedence over &
+select 0x0F << 4 & 0xF0, (0x0F << 4) & 0xF0, 0x0F << (4 & 0xF0);
+0x0F << 4 & 0xF0	(0x0F << 4) & 0xF0	0x0F << (4 & 0xF0)
+240	240	15
+select 0xF0 & 0x0F << 4, (0xF0 & 0x0F) << 4, 0xF0 & (0x0F << 4);
+0xF0 & 0x0F << 4	(0xF0 & 0x0F) << 4	0xF0 & (0x0F << 4)
+240	0	240
+Testing that >> has precedence over &
+select 0xF0 >> 4 & 0x55, (0xF0 >> 4) & 0x55, 0xF0 >> (4 & 0x55);
+0xF0 >> 4 & 0x55	(0xF0 >> 4) & 0x55	0xF0 >> (4 & 0x55)
+5	5	15
+select 0x0F & 0xF0 >> 4, (0x0F & 0xF0) >> 4, 0x0F & (0xF0 >> 4);
+0x0F & 0xF0 >> 4	(0x0F & 0xF0) >> 4	0x0F & (0xF0 >> 4)
+15	0	15
+Testing that >> and << have the same precedence
+select 0xFF >> 4 << 2, (0xFF >> 4) << 2, 0xFF >> (4 << 2);
+0xFF >> 4 << 2	(0xFF >> 4) << 2	0xFF >> (4 << 2)
+60	60	0
+select 0x0F << 4 >> 2, (0x0F << 4) >> 2, 0x0F << (4 >> 2);
+0x0F << 4 >> 2	(0x0F << 4) >> 2	0x0F << (4 >> 2)
+60	60	30
+Testing that binary + is associative
+select 1 + 2 + 3, (1 + 2) + 3, 1 + (2 + 3);
+1 + 2 + 3	(1 + 2) + 3	1 + (2 + 3)
+6	6	6
+Testing that binary - is left associative
+select 1 - 2 - 3, (1 - 2) - 3, 1 - (2 - 3);
+1 - 2 - 3	(1 - 2) - 3	1 - (2 - 3)
+-4	-4	2
+Testing that binary + and binary - have the same precedence
+select 1 + 2 - 3, (1 + 2) - 3, 1 + (2 - 3);
+1 + 2 - 3	(1 + 2) - 3	1 + (2 - 3)
+0	0	0
+select 1 - 2 + 3, (1 - 2) + 3, 1 - (2 + 3);
+1 - 2 + 3	(1 - 2) + 3	1 - (2 + 3)
+2	2	-4
+Testing that binary + has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 + 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 + 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 + (0x0F | 0x55);
+0xF0 + 0x0F | 0x55	(0xF0 + 0x0F) | 0x55	0xF0 + (0x0F | 0x55)
+255	255	335
+select 0x55 | 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0x55 | 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0x55 | (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+0x55 | 0xF0 + 0x0F	(0x55 | 0xF0) + 0x0F	0x55 | (0xF0 + 0x0F)
+255	260	255
+Testing that binary + has precedence over &
+select 0xF0 + 0x0F & 0x55, (0xF0 + 0x0F) & 0x55, 0xF0 + (0x0F & 0x55);
+0xF0 + 0x0F & 0x55	(0xF0 + 0x0F) & 0x55	0xF0 + (0x0F & 0x55)
+85	85	245
+select 0x55 & 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0x55 & 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0x55 & (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+0x55 & 0xF0 + 0x0F	(0x55 & 0xF0) + 0x0F	0x55 & (0xF0 + 0x0F)
+85	95	85
+Testing that binary + has precedence over <<
+select 2 + 3 << 4, (2 + 3) << 4, 2 + (3 << 4);
+2 + 3 << 4	(2 + 3) << 4	2 + (3 << 4)
+80	80	50
+select 3 << 4 + 2, (3 << 4) + 2, 3 << (4 + 2);
+3 << 4 + 2	(3 << 4) + 2	3 << (4 + 2)
+192	50	192
+Testing that binary + has precedence over >>
+select 4 + 3 >> 2, (4 + 3) >> 2, 4 + (3 >> 2);
+4 + 3 >> 2	(4 + 3) >> 2	4 + (3 >> 2)
+1	1	4
+select 3 >> 2 + 1, (3 >> 2) + 1, 3 >> (2 + 1);
+3 >> 2 + 1	(3 >> 2) + 1	3 >> (2 + 1)
+0	1	0
+Testing that binary - has precedence over |
+select 0xFF - 0x0F | 0x55, (0xFF - 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xFF - (0x0F | 0x55);
+0xFF - 0x0F | 0x55	(0xFF - 0x0F) | 0x55	0xFF - (0x0F | 0x55)
+245	245	160
+select 0x55 | 0xFF - 0xF0, (0x55 | 0xFF) - 0xF0, 0x55 | (0xFF - 0xF0);
+0x55 | 0xFF - 0xF0	(0x55 | 0xFF) - 0xF0	0x55 | (0xFF - 0xF0)
+95	15	95
+Testing that binary - has precedence over &
+select 0xFF - 0xF0 & 0x55, (0xFF - 0xF0) & 0x55, 0xFF - (0xF0 & 0x55);
+0xFF - 0xF0 & 0x55	(0xFF - 0xF0) & 0x55	0xFF - (0xF0 & 0x55)
+5	5	175
+select 0x55 & 0xFF - 0xF0, (0x55 & 0xFF) - 0xF0, 0x55 & (0xFF - 0xF0);
+0x55 & 0xFF - 0xF0	(0x55 & 0xFF) - 0xF0	0x55 & (0xFF - 0xF0)
+5	-155	5
+Testing that binary - has precedence over <<
+select 16 - 3 << 2, (16 - 3) << 2, 16 - (3 << 2);
+16 - 3 << 2	(16 - 3) << 2	16 - (3 << 2)
+52	52	4
+select 4 << 3 - 2, (4 << 3) - 2, 4 << (3 - 2);
+4 << 3 - 2	(4 << 3) - 2	4 << (3 - 2)
+8	30	8
+Testing that binary - has precedence over >>
+select 16 - 3 >> 2, (16 - 3) >> 2, 16 - (3 >> 2);
+16 - 3 >> 2	(16 - 3) >> 2	16 - (3 >> 2)
+3	3	16
+select 16 >> 3 - 2, (16 >> 3) - 2, 16 >> (3 - 2);
+16 >> 3 - 2	(16 >> 3) - 2	16 >> (3 - 2)
+8	0	8
+Testing that * is associative
+select 2 * 3 * 4, (2 * 3) * 4, 2 * (3 * 4);
+2 * 3 * 4	(2 * 3) * 4	2 * (3 * 4)
+24	24	24
+Testing that * has precedence over |
+select 2 * 0x40 | 0x0F, (2 * 0x40) | 0x0F, 2 * (0x40 | 0x0F);
+2 * 0x40 | 0x0F	(2 * 0x40) | 0x0F	2 * (0x40 | 0x0F)
+143	143	158
+select 0x0F | 2 * 0x40, (0x0F | 2) * 0x40, 0x0F | (2 * 0x40);
+0x0F | 2 * 0x40	(0x0F | 2) * 0x40	0x0F | (2 * 0x40)
+143	960	143
+Testing that * has precedence over &
+select 2 * 0x40 & 0x55, (2 * 0x40) & 0x55, 2 * (0x40 & 0x55);
+2 * 0x40 & 0x55	(2 * 0x40) & 0x55	2 * (0x40 & 0x55)
+0	0	128
+select 0xF0 & 2 * 0x40, (0xF0 & 2) * 0x40, 0xF0 & (2 * 0x40);
+0xF0 & 2 * 0x40	(0xF0 & 2) * 0x40	0xF0 & (2 * 0x40)
+128	0	128
+Testing that * has precedence over << 
+select 5 * 3 << 4, (5 * 3) << 4, 5 * (3 << 4);
+5 * 3 << 4	(5 * 3) << 4	5 * (3 << 4)
+240	240	240
+select 2 << 3 * 4, (2 << 3) * 4, 2 << (3 * 4);
+2 << 3 * 4	(2 << 3) * 4	2 << (3 * 4)
+8192	64	8192
+Testing that * has precedence over >>
+select 3 * 4 >> 2, (3 * 4) >> 2, 3 * (4 >> 2);
+3 * 4 >> 2	(3 * 4) >> 2	3 * (4 >> 2)
+3	3	3
+select 4 >> 2 * 3, (4 >> 2) * 3, 4 >> (2 * 3);
+4 >> 2 * 3	(4 >> 2) * 3	4 >> (2 * 3)
+0	3	0
+Testing that * has precedence over binary +
+select 2 * 3 + 4, (2 * 3) + 4, 2 * (3 + 4);
+2 * 3 + 4	(2 * 3) + 4	2 * (3 + 4)
+10	10	14
+select 2 + 3 * 4, (2 + 3) * 4, 2 + (3 * 4);
+2 + 3 * 4	(2 + 3) * 4	2 + (3 * 4)
+14	20	14
+Testing that * has precedence over binary -
+select 4 * 3 - 2, (4 * 3) - 2, 4 * (3 - 2);
+4 * 3 - 2	(4 * 3) - 2	4 * (3 - 2)
+10	10	4
+select 4 - 3 * 2, (4 - 3) * 2, 4 - (3 * 2);
+4 - 3 * 2	(4 - 3) * 2	4 - (3 * 2)
+-2	2	-2
+Testing that / is left associative
+select 15 / 5 / 3, (15 / 5) / 3, 15 / (5 / 3);
+15 / 5 / 3	(15 / 5) / 3	15 / (5 / 3)
+1.00000000	1.00000000	9.0000
+Testing that / has precedence over |
+select 105 / 5 | 2, (105 / 5) | 2, 105 / (5 | 2);
+105 / 5 | 2	(105 / 5) | 2	105 / (5 | 2)
+23	23	15.0000
+select 105 | 2 / 5, (105 | 2) / 5, 105 | (2 / 5);
+105 | 2 / 5	(105 | 2) / 5	105 | (2 / 5)
+105	21.4000	105
+Testing that / has precedence over &
+select 105 / 5 & 0x0F, (105 / 5) & 0x0F, 105 / (5 & 0x0F);
+105 / 5 & 0x0F	(105 / 5) & 0x0F	105 / (5 & 0x0F)
+5	5	21.0000
+select 0x0F & 105 / 5, (0x0F & 105) / 5, 0x0F & (105 / 5);
+0x0F & 105 / 5	(0x0F & 105) / 5	0x0F & (105 / 5)
+5	1.8000	5
+Testing that / has precedence over << 
+select 0x80 / 4 << 2, (0x80 / 4) << 2, 0x80 / (4 << 2);
+0x80 / 4 << 2	(0x80 / 4) << 2	0x80 / (4 << 2)
+128	128	8.0000
+select 0x80 << 4 / 2, (0x80 << 4) / 2, 0x80 << (4 / 2);
+0x80 << 4 / 2	(0x80 << 4) / 2	0x80 << (4 / 2)
+512	1024.0000	512
+Testing that / has precedence over >>
+select 0x80 / 4 >> 2, (0x80 / 4) >> 2, 0x80 / (4 >> 2);
+0x80 / 4 >> 2	(0x80 / 4) >> 2	0x80 / (4 >> 2)
+8	8	128.0000
+select 0x80 >> 4 / 2, (0x80 >> 4) / 2, 0x80 >> (4 / 2);
+0x80 >> 4 / 2	(0x80 >> 4) / 2	0x80 >> (4 / 2)
+32	4.0000	32
+Testing that / has precedence over binary +
+select 0x80 / 2 + 2, (0x80 / 2) + 2, 0x80 / (2 + 2);
+0x80 / 2 + 2	(0x80 / 2) + 2	0x80 / (2 + 2)
+66.0000	66.0000	32.0000
+select 0x80 + 2 / 2, (0x80 + 2) / 2, 0x80 + (2 / 2);
+0x80 + 2 / 2	(0x80 + 2) / 2	0x80 + (2 / 2)
+129.0000	65.0000	129.0000
+Testing that / has precedence over binary -
+select 0x80 / 4 - 2, (0x80 / 4) - 2, 0x80 / (4 - 2);
+0x80 / 4 - 2	(0x80 / 4) - 2	0x80 / (4 - 2)
+30.0000	30.0000	64.0000
+select 0x80 - 4 / 2, (0x80 - 4) / 2, 0x80 - (4 / 2);
+0x80 - 4 / 2	(0x80 - 4) / 2	0x80 - (4 / 2)
+126.0000	62.0000	126.0000
+Testing that ^ is associative
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 ^ 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) ^ 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 ^ 0x0F);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 ^ 0x0F	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) ^ 0x0F	0xFF ^ (0xF0 ^ 0x0F)
+0	0	0
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 ^ 0x55, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) ^ 0x55, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 ^ 0x55);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 ^ 0x55	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) ^ 0x55	0xFF ^ (0xF0 ^ 0x55)
+90	90	90
+Testing that ^ has precedence over |
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 | 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) | 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 | 0x0F);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 | 0x0F	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) | 0x0F	0xFF ^ (0xF0 | 0x0F)
+15	15	0
+select 0xF0 | 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0xF0 | 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0xF0 | (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+0xF0 | 0xFF ^ 0xF0	(0xF0 | 0xFF) ^ 0xF0	0xF0 | (0xFF ^ 0xF0)
+255	15	255
+Testing that ^ has precedence over &
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 & 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) & 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 & 0x0F);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 & 0x0F	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) & 0x0F	0xFF ^ (0xF0 & 0x0F)
+15	15	255
+select 0x0F & 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0x0F & 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0x0F & (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+0x0F & 0xFF ^ 0xF0	(0x0F & 0xFF) ^ 0xF0	0x0F & (0xFF ^ 0xF0)
+15	255	15
+Testing that ^ has precedence over <<
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 << 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) << 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 << 2);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 << 2	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) << 2	0xFF ^ (0xF0 << 2)
+60	60	831
+select 0x0F << 2 ^ 0xFF, (0x0F << 2) ^ 0xFF, 0x0F << (2 ^ 0xFF);
+0x0F << 2 ^ 0xFF	(0x0F << 2) ^ 0xFF	0x0F << (2 ^ 0xFF)
+0	195	0
+Testing that ^ has precedence over >>
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 >> 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) >> 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 >> 2);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 >> 2	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) >> 2	0xFF ^ (0xF0 >> 2)
+3	3	195
+select 0xFF >> 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF >> 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF >> (2 ^ 0xF0);
+0xFF >> 2 ^ 0xF0	(0xFF >> 2) ^ 0xF0	0xFF >> (2 ^ 0xF0)
+0	207	0
+Testing that ^ has precedence over binary +
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 + 0x0F	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) + 0x0F	0xFF ^ (0xF0 + 0x0F)
+30	30	0
+select 0x0F + 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0x0F + 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0x0F + (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+0x0F + 0xFF ^ 0xF0	(0x0F + 0xFF) ^ 0xF0	0x0F + (0xFF ^ 0xF0)
+30	510	30
+Testing that ^ has precedence over binary -
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 - 1, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) - 1, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 - 1);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 - 1	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) - 1	0xFF ^ (0xF0 - 1)
+14	14	16
+select 0x55 - 0x0F ^ 0x55, (0x55 - 0x0F) ^ 0x55, 0x55 - (0x0F ^ 0x55);
+0x55 - 0x0F ^ 0x55	(0x55 - 0x0F) ^ 0x55	0x55 - (0x0F ^ 0x55)
+-5	19	-5
+Testing that ^ has precedence over *
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 * 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) * 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 * 2);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 * 2	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) * 2	0xFF ^ (0xF0 * 2)
+30	30	287
+select 2 * 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (2 * 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 2 * (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+2 * 0xFF ^ 0xF0	(2 * 0xFF) ^ 0xF0	2 * (0xFF ^ 0xF0)
+30	270	30
+Testing that ^ has precedence over /
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 / 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) / 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 / 2);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 / 2	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) / 2	0xFF ^ (0xF0 / 2)
+7.5000	7.5000	135
+select 0xF2 / 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xF2 / 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xF2 / (2 ^ 0xF0);
+0xF2 / 2 ^ 0xF0	(0xF2 / 2) ^ 0xF0	0xF2 / (2 ^ 0xF0)
+1.0000	137	1.0000
+Testing that ^ has precedence over %
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 % 0x20, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) % 0x20, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 % 0x20);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 % 0x20	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) % 0x20	0xFF ^ (0xF0 % 0x20)
+15	15	239
+select 0xFF % 0x20 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF % 0x20) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF % (0x20 ^ 0xF0);
+0xFF % 0x20 ^ 0xF0	(0xFF % 0x20) ^ 0xF0	0xFF % (0x20 ^ 0xF0)
+47	239	47
+Testing that ^ has precedence over DIV
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 DIV 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) DIV 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 DIV 2);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 DIV 2	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) DIV 2	0xFF ^ (0xF0 DIV 2)
+7	7	135
+select 0xF2 DIV 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xF2 DIV 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xF2 DIV (2 ^ 0xF0);
+0xF2 DIV 2 ^ 0xF0	(0xF2 DIV 2) ^ 0xF0	0xF2 DIV (2 ^ 0xF0)
+1	137	1
+Testing that ^ has precedence over MOD
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 MOD 0x20, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) MOD 0x20, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 MOD 0x20);
+0xFF ^ 0xF0 MOD 0x20	(0xFF ^ 0xF0) MOD 0x20	0xFF ^ (0xF0 MOD 0x20)
+15	15	239
+select 0xFF MOD 0x20 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF MOD 0x20) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF MOD (0x20 ^ 0xF0);
+0xFF MOD 0x20 ^ 0xF0	(0xFF MOD 0x20) ^ 0xF0	0xFF MOD (0x20 ^ 0xF0)
+47	239	47

mysql-test/r/sp.result

@@ -6315,4 +6315,56 @@ CALL p1();
 NULL
 SET NAMES default;
 DROP PROCEDURE p1;
+
+# Bug#13675.
+
+DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS p1;
+DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS p2;
+DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
+
+CREATE PROCEDURE p1(v DATETIME) CREATE TABLE t1 SELECT v;
+CREATE PROCEDURE p2(v INT) CREATE TABLE t1 SELECT v;
+
+CALL p1(NOW());
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+Table	Create Table
+t1	CREATE TABLE `t1` (
+  `v` datetime default NULL
+) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
+
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+CALL p1('text');
+Warnings:
+Warning	1264	Out of range value adjusted for column 'v' at row 1
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+Table	Create Table
+t1	CREATE TABLE `t1` (
+  `v` datetime default NULL
+) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
+
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+CALL p2(10);
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+Table	Create Table
+t1	CREATE TABLE `t1` (
+  `v` bigint(11) default NULL
+) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
+
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+CALL p2('text');
+Warnings:
+Warning	1366	Incorrect integer value: 'text' for column 'v' at row 1
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+Table	Create Table
+t1	CREATE TABLE `t1` (
+  `v` bigint(11) default NULL
+) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
+
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+DROP PROCEDURE p1;
+DROP PROCEDURE p2;
 End of 5.0 tests

mysql-test/t/comments.test

@@ -19,3 +19,36 @@ select 1 # The rest of the row will be ignored
 /* line with only comment */;
 
 # End of 4.1 tests
+
+
+#
+# Bug#28779 (mysql_query() allows execution of statements with unbalanced
+# comments)
+#
+
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists table_28779;
+--enable_warnings
+
+create table table_28779 (a int);
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*' AND b = 'bar';";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*' AND b = 'bar';*";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*! AND 2=2;";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*! AND 2=2;*";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*!98765' AND b = 'bar';";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*!98765' AND b = 'bar';*";
+
+drop table table_28779;
+

mysql-test/t/handler.test

@@ -441,3 +441,22 @@ handler t1 open;
 --echo --> client 1
 connection default;
 drop table t1;
+
+#
+# Bug#30632 HANDLER read failure causes hang
+#
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists t1;
+--enable_warnings
+create table t1 (a int);
+handler t1 open as t1_alias;
+--error 1176
+handler t1_alias read a next;
+--error 1054
+handler t1_alias READ a next where inexistent > 0;
+--error 1176
+handler t1_alias read a next;
+--error 1054
+handler t1_alias READ a next where inexistent > 0;
+handler t1_alias close;
+drop table t1;

mysql-test/t/innodb-deadlock.test

@@ -112,4 +112,29 @@ commit;
 
 drop table t1, t2;
 
-# End of 4.1 tests
+--echo End of 4.1 tests
+
+#
+# Bug#25164 create table `a` as select * from `A` hangs
+#
+
+set storage_engine=innodb;
+
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists a;
+drop table if exists A;
+--enable_warnings
+
+create table A (c int);
+insert into A (c) values (0);
+--error 0,ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK,ER_UPDATE_TABLE_USED
+create table a as select * from A;
+drop table A;
+
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists a;
+--enable_warnings
+
+set storage_engine=default;
+
+--echo End of 5.0 tests.

mysql-test/t/mysql.test

@@ -276,4 +276,9 @@ remove_file $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/bug21412.sql;
 --exec $MYSQL --pager="540bytelengthstringxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" -e "select 1" > /dev/null 2>&1
 --exec $MYSQL --character-sets-dir="540bytelengthstringxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" -e "select 1" 2>&1
 
+#
+# bug #30164: Using client side macro inside server side comments generates broken queries
+#
+--exec $MYSQL test -e "/*! \C latin1 */ select 1;"
+
 --echo End of 5.0 tests

mysql-test/t/parser_precedence.test

+
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists t1_30237_bool;
+--enable_warnings
+
+create table t1_30237_bool(A boolean, B boolean, C boolean);
+
+insert into t1_30237_bool values
+(FALSE, FALSE, FALSE),
+(FALSE, FALSE, NULL),
+(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE),
+(FALSE, NULL, FALSE),
+(FALSE, NULL, NULL),
+(FALSE, NULL, TRUE),
+(FALSE, TRUE, FALSE),
+(FALSE, TRUE, NULL),
+(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE),
+(NULL, FALSE, FALSE),
+(NULL, FALSE, NULL),
+(NULL, FALSE, TRUE),
+(NULL, NULL, FALSE),
+(NULL, NULL, NULL),
+(NULL, NULL, TRUE),
+(NULL, TRUE, FALSE),
+(NULL, TRUE, NULL),
+(NULL, TRUE, TRUE),
+(TRUE, FALSE, FALSE),
+(TRUE, FALSE, NULL),
+(TRUE, FALSE, TRUE),
+(TRUE, NULL, FALSE),
+(TRUE, NULL, NULL),
+(TRUE, NULL, TRUE),
+(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE),
+(TRUE, TRUE, NULL),
+(TRUE, TRUE, TRUE) ;
+
+--echo Testing OR, XOR, AND
+select A, B, A OR B, A XOR B, A AND B
+  from t1_30237_bool where C is null order by A, B;
+
+--echo Testing that OR is associative 
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) OR C, A OR (B OR C), A OR B OR C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where ((A OR B) OR C) != (A OR (B OR C));
+
+--echo Testing that XOR is associative 
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) XOR C, A XOR (B XOR C), A XOR B XOR C
+  from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where ((A XOR B) XOR C) != (A XOR (B XOR C));
+
+--echo Testing that AND is associative 
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) AND C, A AND (B AND C), A AND B AND C
+  from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where ((A AND B) AND C) != (A AND (B AND C));
+
+--echo Testing that AND has precedence over OR
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) AND C, A OR (B AND C), A OR B AND C
+  from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where (A OR (B AND C)) != (A OR B AND C);
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) OR C, A AND (B OR C), A AND B OR C
+  from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where ((A AND B) OR C) != (A AND B OR C);
+
+--echo Testing that AND has precedence over XOR
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) AND C, A XOR (B AND C), A XOR B AND C
+  from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where (A XOR (B AND C)) != (A XOR B AND C);
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) XOR C, A AND (B XOR C), A AND B XOR C
+  from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where ((A AND B) XOR C) != (A AND B XOR C);
+
+--echo Testing that XOR has precedence over OR
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) OR C, A XOR (B OR C), A XOR B OR C
+  from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where ((A XOR B) OR C) != (A XOR B OR C);
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) XOR C, A OR (B XOR C), A OR B XOR C
+  from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+  where (A OR (B XOR C)) != (A OR B XOR C);
+
+drop table t1_30237_bool;
+
+--echo Testing that NOT has precedence over OR
+select (NOT FALSE) OR TRUE, NOT (FALSE OR TRUE), NOT FALSE OR TRUE;
+
+--echo Testing that NOT has precedence over XOR
+select (NOT FALSE) XOR FALSE, NOT (FALSE XOR FALSE), NOT FALSE XOR FALSE;
+
+--echo Testing that NOT has precedence over AND
+select (NOT FALSE) AND FALSE, NOT (FALSE AND FALSE), NOT FALSE AND FALSE;
+
+--echo Testing that NOT is associative
+select NOT NOT TRUE, NOT NOT NOT FALSE;
+
+--echo Testing that IS has precedence over NOT
+select (NOT NULL) IS TRUE, NOT (NULL IS TRUE), NOT NULL IS TRUE;
+select (NOT NULL) IS NOT TRUE, NOT (NULL IS NOT TRUE), NOT NULL IS NOT TRUE;
+select (NOT NULL) IS FALSE, NOT (NULL IS FALSE), NOT NULL IS FALSE;
+select (NOT NULL) IS NOT FALSE, NOT (NULL IS NOT FALSE), NOT NULL IS NOT FALSE;
+select (NOT TRUE) IS UNKNOWN, NOT (TRUE IS UNKNOWN), NOT TRUE IS UNKNOWN;
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NOT UNKNOWN, NOT (TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN), NOT TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN;
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NULL, NOT (TRUE IS NULL), NOT TRUE IS NULL;
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NOT NULL, NOT (TRUE IS NOT NULL), NOT TRUE IS NOT NULL;
+
+--echo Testing that IS [NOT] TRUE/FALSE/UNKNOWN predicates are not associative
+# Documenting existing behavior in 5.0.48
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select TRUE IS TRUE IS TRUE IS TRUE;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select FALSE IS NOT TRUE IS NOT TRUE IS NOT TRUE;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select NULL IS FALSE IS FALSE IS FALSE;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select TRUE IS NOT FALSE IS NOT FALSE IS NOT FALSE;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select FALSE IS UNKNOWN IS UNKNOWN IS UNKNOWN;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN IS NOT UNKNOWN IS NOT UNKNOWN;
+
+--echo Testing that IS [NOT] NULL predicates are associative
+# Documenting existing behavior in 5.0.48
+select FALSE IS NULL IS NULL IS NULL;
+select TRUE IS NOT NULL IS NOT NULL IS NOT NULL;
+
+--echo Testing that comparison operators are left associative
+select 1 <=> 2 <=> 2, (1 <=> 2) <=> 2, 1 <=> (2 <=> 2);
+select 1 = 2 = 2, (1 = 2) = 2, 1 = (2 = 2);
+select 1 != 2 != 3, (1 != 2) != 3, 1 != (2 != 3);
+select 1 <> 2 <> 3, (1 <> 2) <> 3, 1 <> (2 <> 3);
+select 1 < 2 < 3, (1 < 2) < 3, 1 < (2 < 3);
+select 3 <= 2 <= 1, (3 <= 2) <= 1, 3 <= (2 <= 1);
+select 1 > 2 > 3, (1 > 2) > 3, 1 > (2 > 3);
+select 1 >= 2 >= 3, (1 >= 2) >= 3, 1 >= (2 >= 3);
+
+-- echo Testing that | is associative
+select 0xF0 | 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 | 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 | (0x0F | 0x55);
+
+-- echo Testing that & is associative
+select 0xF5 & 0x5F & 0x55, (0xF5 & 0x5F) & 0x55, 0xF5 & (0x5F & 0x55);
+
+-- echo Testing that << is left associative
+select 4 << 3 << 2, (4 << 3) << 2, 4 << (3 << 2);
+
+-- echo Testing that >> is left associative
+select 256 >> 3 >> 2, (256 >> 3) >> 2, 256 >> (3 >> 2);
+
+--echo Testing that & has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 & 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 & 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 & (0x0F | 0x55);
+select 0x55 | 0xF0 & 0x0F, (0x55 | 0xF0) & 0x0F, 0x55 | (0xF0 & 0x0F);
+
+--echo Testing that << has precedence over |
+select 0x0F << 4 | 0x0F, (0x0F << 4) | 0x0F, 0x0F << (4 | 0x0F);
+select 0x0F | 0x0F << 4, (0x0F | 0x0F) << 4, 0x0F | (0x0F << 4);
+
+--echo Testing that >> has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 >> 4 | 0xFF, (0xF0 >> 4) | 0xFF, 0xF0 >> (4 | 0xFF);
+select 0xFF | 0xF0 >> 4, (0xFF | 0xF0) >> 4, 0xFF | (0xF0 >> 4);
+
+--echo Testing that << has precedence over &
+select 0x0F << 4 & 0xF0, (0x0F << 4) & 0xF0, 0x0F << (4 & 0xF0);
+select 0xF0 & 0x0F << 4, (0xF0 & 0x0F) << 4, 0xF0 & (0x0F << 4);
+
+--echo Testing that >> has precedence over &
+select 0xF0 >> 4 & 0x55, (0xF0 >> 4) & 0x55, 0xF0 >> (4 & 0x55);
+select 0x0F & 0xF0 >> 4, (0x0F & 0xF0) >> 4, 0x0F & (0xF0 >> 4);
+
+--echo Testing that >> and << have the same precedence
+select 0xFF >> 4 << 2, (0xFF >> 4) << 2, 0xFF >> (4 << 2);
+select 0x0F << 4 >> 2, (0x0F << 4) >> 2, 0x0F << (4 >> 2);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + is associative
+select 1 + 2 + 3, (1 + 2) + 3, 1 + (2 + 3);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - is left associative
+select 1 - 2 - 3, (1 - 2) - 3, 1 - (2 - 3);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + and binary - have the same precedence
+# evaluated left to right
+select 1 + 2 - 3, (1 + 2) - 3, 1 + (2 - 3);
+select 1 - 2 + 3, (1 - 2) + 3, 1 - (2 + 3);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 + 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 + 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 + (0x0F | 0x55);
+select 0x55 | 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0x55 | 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0x55 | (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + has precedence over &
+select 0xF0 + 0x0F & 0x55, (0xF0 + 0x0F) & 0x55, 0xF0 + (0x0F & 0x55);
+select 0x55 & 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0x55 & 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0x55 & (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + has precedence over <<
+select 2 + 3 << 4, (2 + 3) << 4, 2 + (3 << 4);
+select 3 << 4 + 2, (3 << 4) + 2, 3 << (4 + 2);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + has precedence over >>
+select 4 + 3 >> 2, (4 + 3) >> 2, 4 + (3 >> 2);
+select 3 >> 2 + 1, (3 >> 2) + 1, 3 >> (2 + 1);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - has precedence over |
+select 0xFF - 0x0F | 0x55, (0xFF - 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xFF - (0x0F | 0x55);
+select 0x55 | 0xFF - 0xF0, (0x55 | 0xFF) - 0xF0, 0x55 | (0xFF - 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - has precedence over &
+select 0xFF - 0xF0 & 0x55, (0xFF - 0xF0) & 0x55, 0xFF - (0xF0 & 0x55);
+select 0x55 & 0xFF - 0xF0, (0x55 & 0xFF) - 0xF0, 0x55 & (0xFF - 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - has precedence over <<
+select 16 - 3 << 2, (16 - 3) << 2, 16 - (3 << 2);
+select 4 << 3 - 2, (4 << 3) - 2, 4 << (3 - 2);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - has precedence over >>
+select 16 - 3 >> 2, (16 - 3) >> 2, 16 - (3 >> 2);
+select 16 >> 3 - 2, (16 >> 3) - 2, 16 >> (3 - 2);
+
+--echo Testing that * is associative
+select 2 * 3 * 4, (2 * 3) * 4, 2 * (3 * 4);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over |
+select 2 * 0x40 | 0x0F, (2 * 0x40) | 0x0F, 2 * (0x40 | 0x0F);
+select 0x0F | 2 * 0x40, (0x0F | 2) * 0x40, 0x0F | (2 * 0x40);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over &
+select 2 * 0x40 & 0x55, (2 * 0x40) & 0x55, 2 * (0x40 & 0x55);
+select 0xF0 & 2 * 0x40, (0xF0 & 2) * 0x40, 0xF0 & (2 * 0x40);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over << 
+# Actually, can't prove it for the first case,
+# since << is a multiplication by a power of 2,
+# and * is associative
+select 5 * 3 << 4, (5 * 3) << 4, 5 * (3 << 4);
+select 2 << 3 * 4, (2 << 3) * 4, 2 << (3 * 4);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over >>
+# >> is a multiplication by a (negative) power of 2,
+# see above.
+select 3 * 4 >> 2, (3 * 4) >> 2, 3 * (4 >> 2);
+select 4 >> 2 * 3, (4 >> 2) * 3, 4 >> (2 * 3);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over binary +
+select 2 * 3 + 4, (2 * 3) + 4, 2 * (3 + 4);
+select 2 + 3 * 4, (2 + 3) * 4, 2 + (3 * 4);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over binary -
+select 4 * 3 - 2, (4 * 3) - 2, 4 * (3 - 2);
+select 4 - 3 * 2, (4 - 3) * 2, 4 - (3 * 2);
+
+--echo Testing that / is left associative
+select 15 / 5 / 3, (15 / 5) / 3, 15 / (5 / 3);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over |
+select 105 / 5 | 2, (105 / 5) | 2, 105 / (5 | 2);
+select 105 | 2 / 5, (105 | 2) / 5, 105 | (2 / 5);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over &
+select 105 / 5 & 0x0F, (105 / 5) & 0x0F, 105 / (5 & 0x0F);
+select 0x0F & 105 / 5, (0x0F & 105) / 5, 0x0F & (105 / 5);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over << 
+select 0x80 / 4 << 2, (0x80 / 4) << 2, 0x80 / (4 << 2);
+select 0x80 << 4 / 2, (0x80 << 4) / 2, 0x80 << (4 / 2);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over >>
+select 0x80 / 4 >> 2, (0x80 / 4) >> 2, 0x80 / (4 >> 2);
+select 0x80 >> 4 / 2, (0x80 >> 4) / 2, 0x80 >> (4 / 2);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over binary +
+select 0x80 / 2 + 2, (0x80 / 2) + 2, 0x80 / (2 + 2);
+select 0x80 + 2 / 2, (0x80 + 2) / 2, 0x80 + (2 / 2);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over binary -
+select 0x80 / 4 - 2, (0x80 / 4) - 2, 0x80 / (4 - 2);
+select 0x80 - 4 / 2, (0x80 - 4) / 2, 0x80 - (4 / 2);
+
+# TODO: %, DIV, MOD
+
+--echo Testing that ^ is associative
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 ^ 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) ^ 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 ^ 0x0F);
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 ^ 0x55, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) ^ 0x55, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 ^ 0x55);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over |
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 | 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) | 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 | 0x0F);
+select 0xF0 | 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0xF0 | 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0xF0 | (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over &
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 & 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) & 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 & 0x0F);
+select 0x0F & 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0x0F & 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0x0F & (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over <<
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 << 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) << 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 << 2);
+select 0x0F << 2 ^ 0xFF, (0x0F << 2) ^ 0xFF, 0x0F << (2 ^ 0xFF);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over >>
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 >> 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) >> 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 >> 2);
+select 0xFF >> 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF >> 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF >> (2 ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over binary +
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+select 0x0F + 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0x0F + 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0x0F + (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over binary -
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 - 1, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) - 1, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 - 1);
+select 0x55 - 0x0F ^ 0x55, (0x55 - 0x0F) ^ 0x55, 0x55 - (0x0F ^ 0x55);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over *
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 * 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) * 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 * 2);
+select 2 * 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (2 * 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 2 * (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over /
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 / 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) / 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 / 2);
+select 0xF2 / 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xF2 / 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xF2 / (2 ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over %
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 % 0x20, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) % 0x20, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 % 0x20);
+select 0xFF % 0x20 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF % 0x20) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF % (0x20 ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over DIV
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 DIV 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) DIV 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 DIV 2);
+select 0xF2 DIV 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xF2 DIV 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xF2 DIV (2 ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over MOD
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 MOD 0x20, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) MOD 0x20, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 MOD 0x20);
+select 0xFF MOD 0x20 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF MOD 0x20) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF MOD (0x20 ^ 0xF0);
+

mysql-test/t/sp.test

@@ -7300,4 +7300,58 @@ CALL p1();
 SET NAMES default;
 DROP PROCEDURE p1;
 
+#
+# Bug#13675: DATETIME/DATE type in store proc param seems to be converted as
+# varbinary
+#
+
+--echo
+--echo # Bug#13675.
+--echo
+
+--disable_warnings
+DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS p1;
+DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS p2;
+
+DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
+--enable_warnings
+
+--echo
+
+CREATE PROCEDURE p1(v DATETIME) CREATE TABLE t1 SELECT v;
+
+CREATE PROCEDURE p2(v INT) CREATE TABLE t1 SELECT v;
+
+--echo
+CALL p1(NOW());
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+CALL p1('text');
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+CALL p2(10);
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+CALL p2('text');
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP PROCEDURE p1;
+DROP PROCEDURE p2;
+
 --echo End of 5.0 tests

sql/item_cmpfunc.h

@@ -1361,6 +1361,7 @@ public:
   Item_cond(List<Item> &nlist)
     :Item_bool_func(), list(nlist), abort_on_null(0) {}
   bool add(Item *item) { return list.push_back(item); }
+  bool add_at_head(Item *item) { return list.push_front(item); }
   void add_at_head(List<Item> *nlist) { list.prepand(nlist); }
   bool fix_fields(THD *, Item **ref);
 
@@ -1553,6 +1554,15 @@ public:
   Item *neg_transformer(THD *thd);
 };
 
+inline bool is_cond_and(Item *item)
+{
+  if (item->type() != Item::COND_ITEM)
+    return FALSE;
+
+  Item_cond *cond_item= (Item_cond*) item;
+  return (cond_item->functype() == Item_func::COND_AND_FUNC);
+}
+
 class Item_cond_or :public Item_cond
 {
 public:
@@ -1574,6 +1584,14 @@ public:
   Item *neg_transformer(THD *thd);
 };
 
+inline bool is_cond_or(Item *item)
+{
+  if (item->type() != Item::COND_ITEM)
+    return FALSE;
+
+  Item_cond *cond_item= (Item_cond*) item;
+  return (cond_item->functype() == Item_func::COND_OR_FUNC);
+}
 
 /*
   XOR is Item_cond, not an Item_int_func because we could like to

sql/lock.cc

@@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ MYSQL_LOCK *mysql_lock_tables(THD *thd, TABLE **tables, uint count,
                                                      thd->lock_id)];
     if (rc > 1)                                 /* a timeout or a deadlock */
     {
+      if (sql_lock->table_count)
+        VOID(unlock_external(thd, sql_lock->table, sql_lock->table_count));
       my_error(rc, MYF(0));
       my_free((gptr) sql_lock,MYF(0));
       sql_lock= 0;

sql/sql_cache.cc

@@ -1032,6 +1032,13 @@ Query_cache::send_result_to_client(THD *thd, char *sql, uint query_length)
   Query_cache_block_table *block_table, *block_table_end;
   ulong tot_length;
   Query_cache_query_flags flags;
+  const uint spin_treshold= 50000;
+  const double lock_time_treshold= 0.1; /* Time in seconds */
+  uint spin_count= 0;
+  int lock_status= 0;
+  ulong new_time= 0;
+  ulong stop_time= 0;
+
   DBUG_ENTER("Query_cache::send_result_to_client");
 
   /*
@@ -1078,7 +1085,29 @@ Query_cache::send_result_to_client(THD *thd, char *sql, uint query_length)
     }
   }
 
-  STRUCT_LOCK(&structure_guard_mutex);
+  stop_time= my_clock()+(ulong)lock_time_treshold*CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
+  while ((lock_status= pthread_mutex_trylock(&structure_guard_mutex)) == EBUSY
+         && spin_count < spin_treshold
+         && new_time < stop_time)
+  {
+    spin_count++;
+    if (spin_count%5)
+      new_time= my_clock();
+    my_sleep(0);
+  }
+
+  if (lock_status != 0)
+  {
+    /*
+      Query cache is too busy doing something else.
+      Fall back on ordinary statement execution. We also mark this
+      query as unsafe to cache because otherwise this thread will
+      still be halted when the result set is stored to the cache.
+    */
+    thd->lex->safe_to_cache_query= FALSE; 
+    goto err;
+  }
+
   if (query_cache_size == 0 || flush_in_progress)
   {
     DBUG_PRINT("qcache", ("query cache disabled"));

sql/sql_handler.cc

@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ bool mysql_ha_read(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables,
       cond->cleanup();                          // File was reopened
     if ((!cond->fixed &&
 	 cond->fix_fields(thd, &cond)) || cond->check_cols(1))
-      goto err0;
+      goto err;
   }
 
   if (keyname)
@@ -448,13 +448,13 @@ bool mysql_ha_read(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables,
     if ((keyno=find_type(keyname, &table->s->keynames, 1+2)-1)<0)
     {
       my_error(ER_KEY_DOES_NOT_EXITS, MYF(0), keyname, tables->alias);
-      goto err0;
+      goto err;
     }
   }
 
   if (insert_fields(thd, &thd->lex->select_lex.context,
                     tables->db, tables->alias, &it, 0))
-    goto err0;
+    goto err;
 
   protocol->send_fields(&list, Protocol::SEND_NUM_ROWS | Protocol::SEND_EOF);
 

sql/sql_insert.cc

@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ void upgrade_lock_type(THD *thd, thr_lock_type *lock_type,
   if (duplic == DUP_UPDATE ||
       duplic == DUP_REPLACE && *lock_type == TL_WRITE_CONCURRENT_INSERT)
   {
-    *lock_type= TL_WRITE;
+    *lock_type= TL_WRITE_DEFAULT;
     return;
   }
 

sql/sql_lex.cc

@@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static inline uint int_token(const char *str,uint length)
 int MYSQLlex(void *arg, void *yythd)
 {
   reg1	uchar c;
+  bool comment_closed;
   int	tokval, result_state;
   uint length;
   enum my_lex_states state;
@@ -961,15 +962,34 @@ int MYSQLlex(void *arg, void *yythd)
 	  break;
 	}
       }
-      while (lip->ptr != lip->end_of_query &&
-	     ((c=yyGet()) != '*' || yyPeek() != '/'))
+      /*
+        Discard:
+        - regular '/' '*' comments,
+        - special comments '/' '*' '!' for a future version,
+        by scanning until we find a closing '*' '/' marker.
+        Note: There is no such thing as nesting comments,
+        the first '*' '/' sequence seen will mark the end.
+      */
+      comment_closed= FALSE;
+      while (lip->ptr != lip->end_of_query)
       {
-	if (c == '\n')
+        c= yyGet();
+        if (c == '*')
+        {
+          if (yyPeek() == '/')
+          {
+            yySkip();
+            comment_closed= TRUE;
+            state = MY_LEX_START;
+            break;
+          }
+        }
+        else if (c == '\n')
           lip->yylineno++;
       }
-      if (lip->ptr != lip->end_of_query)
-	yySkip();			// remove last '/'
-      state = MY_LEX_START;		// Try again
+      /* Unbalanced comments with a missing '*' '/' are a syntax error */
+      if (! comment_closed)
+        return (ABORT_SYM);
       break;
     case MY_LEX_END_LONG_COMMENT:
       if (lex->in_comment && yyPeek() == '/')
@@ -1009,6 +1029,9 @@ int MYSQLlex(void *arg, void *yythd)
       if (lip->ptr >= lip->end_of_query)
       {
 	lip->next_state=MY_LEX_END;	// Mark for next loop
+        /* Unbalanced comments with a missing '*' '/' are a syntax error */
+        if (lex->in_comment)
+          return (ABORT_SYM);
 	return(END_OF_INPUT);
       }
       state=MY_LEX_CHAR;

sql/sql_yacc.yy

@@ -458,10 +458,10 @@ bool my_yyoverflow(short **a, YYSTYPE **b, ulong *yystacksize);
 
 %pure_parser					/* We have threads */
 /*
-  Currently there is 251 shift/reduce conflict. We should not introduce
-  new conflicts any more.
+  Currently there are 245 shift/reduce conflicts.
+  We should not introduce new conflicts any more.
 */
-%expect 251
+%expect 245
 
 %token  END_OF_INPUT
 
@@ -1011,7 +1011,8 @@ bool my_yyoverflow(short **a, YYSTYPE **b, ulong *yystacksize);
 /* A dummy token to force the priority of table_ref production in a join. */
 %left   TABLE_REF_PRIORITY
 %left   SET_VAR
-%left	OR_OR_SYM OR_SYM OR2_SYM XOR
+%left	OR_OR_SYM OR_SYM OR2_SYM
+%left	XOR
 %left	AND_SYM AND_AND_SYM
 %left	BETWEEN_SYM CASE_SYM WHEN_SYM THEN_SYM ELSE
 %left	EQ EQUAL_SYM GE GT_SYM LE LT NE IS LIKE REGEXP IN_SYM
@@ -1024,6 +1025,7 @@ bool my_yyoverflow(short **a, YYSTYPE **b, ulong *yystacksize);
 %left	NEG '~'
 %right	NOT_SYM NOT2_SYM
 %right	BINARY COLLATE_SYM
+%left   INTERVAL_SYM
 
 %type <lex_str>
         IDENT IDENT_QUOTED TEXT_STRING DECIMAL_NUM FLOAT_NUM NUM LONG_NUM HEX_NUM
@@ -1066,8 +1068,9 @@ bool my_yyoverflow(short **a, YYSTYPE **b, ulong *yystacksize);
 %type <item>
 	literal text_literal insert_ident order_ident
 	simple_ident select_item2 expr opt_expr opt_else sum_expr in_sum_expr
-	variable variable_aux bool_term bool_factor bool_test bool_pri 
-	predicate bit_expr bit_term bit_factor value_expr term factor
+	variable variable_aux
+        bool_pri
+	predicate bit_expr
 	table_wild simple_expr udf_expr
 	expr_or_default set_expr_or_default interval_expr
 	param_marker geometry_function
@@ -4465,76 +4468,125 @@ optional_braces:
 
 /* all possible expressions */
 expr:
-	  bool_term { Select->expr_list.push_front(new List<Item>); }
-          bool_or_expr
+          expr or expr %prec OR_SYM
           {
-            List<Item> *list= Select->expr_list.pop();
-            if (list->elements)
+            /*
+              Design notes:
+              Do not use a manually maintained stack like thd->lex->xxx_list,
+              but use the internal bison stack ($$, $1 and $3) instead.
+              Using the bison stack is:
+              - more robust to changes in the grammar,
+              - guaranteed to be in sync with the parser state,
+              - better for performances (no memory allocation).
+            */
+            Item_cond_or *item1;
+            Item_cond_or *item3;
+            if (is_cond_or($1))
             {
-              list->push_front($1);
-              $$= new Item_cond_or(*list);
-              /* optimize construction of logical OR to reduce
-                 amount of objects for complex expressions */
+              item1= (Item_cond_or*) $1;
+              if (is_cond_or($3))
+              {
+                item3= (Item_cond_or*) $3;
+                /*
+                  (X1 OR X2) OR (Y1 OR Y2) ==> OR (X1, X2, Y1, Y2)
+                */
+                item3->add_at_head(item1->argument_list());
+                $$ = $3;
               }
               else
-              $$= $1;
-            delete list;
+              {
+                /*
+                  (X1 OR X2) OR Y ==> OR (X1, X2, Y)
+                */
+                item1->add($3);
+                $$ = $1;
               }
-	;
-
-bool_or_expr:
-	/* empty */
-        | bool_or_expr or bool_term
-          { Select->expr_list.head()->push_back($3); }
-        ;
-
-bool_term:
-	bool_term XOR bool_term { $$= new Item_cond_xor($1,$3); }
-	| bool_factor { Select->expr_list.push_front(new List<Item>); }
-          bool_and_expr
+            }
+            else if (is_cond_or($3))
             {
-            List<Item> *list= Select->expr_list.pop();
-            if (list->elements)
+              item3= (Item_cond_or*) $3;
+              /*
+                X OR (Y1 OR Y2) ==> OR (X, Y1, Y2)
+              */
+              item3->add_at_head($1);
+              $$ = $3;
+            }
+            else
             {
-              list->push_front($1);
-              $$= new Item_cond_and(*list);
-              /* optimize construction of logical AND to reduce
-                 amount of objects for complex expressions */
+              /* X OR Y */
+              $$ = new (YYTHD->mem_root) Item_cond_or($1, $3);
+            }
+          }
+        | expr XOR expr %prec XOR
+          {
+            /* XOR is a proprietary extension */
+            $$ = new (YYTHD->mem_root) Item_cond_xor($1, $3);
+          }
+        | expr and expr %prec AND_SYM
+          {
+            /* See comments in rule expr: expr or expr */
+            Item_cond_and *item1;
+            Item_cond_and *item3;
+            if (is_cond_and($1))
+            {
+              item1= (Item_cond_and*) $1;
+              if (is_cond_and($3))
+              {
+                item3= (Item_cond_and*) $3;
+                /*
+                  (X1 AND X2) AND (Y1 AND Y2) ==> AND (X1, X2, Y1, Y2)
+                */
+                item3->add_at_head(item1->argument_list());
+                $$ = $3;
               }
               else
-              $$= $1;
-            delete list;
+              {
+                /*
+                  (X1 AND X2) AND Y ==> AND (X1, X2, Y)
+                */
+                item1->add($3);
+                $$ = $1;
               }
-	;
-
-bool_and_expr:
-	/* empty */
-        | bool_and_expr and bool_factor
-          { Select->expr_list.head()->push_back($3); }
-        ;
-
-bool_factor:
-	NOT_SYM bool_factor	{ $$= negate_expression(YYTHD, $2); }
-	| bool_test ;
-
-bool_test:
-          bool_pri IS TRUE_SYM
+            }
+            else if (is_cond_and($3))
+            {
+              item3= (Item_cond_and*) $3;
+              /*
+                X AND (Y1 AND Y2) ==> AND (X, Y1, Y2)
+              */
+              item3->add_at_head($1);
+              $$ = $3;
+            }
+            else
+            {
+              /* X AND Y */
+              $$ = new (YYTHD->mem_root) Item_cond_and($1, $3);
+            }
+          }
+	| NOT_SYM expr %prec NOT_SYM
+          { $$= negate_expression(YYTHD, $2); }
+        | bool_pri IS TRUE_SYM %prec IS
           { $$= new (YYTHD->mem_root) Item_func_istrue($1); }
-        | bool_pri IS not TRUE_SYM
+        | bool_pri IS not TRUE_SYM %prec IS
           { $$= new (YYTHD->mem_root) Item_func_isnottrue($1); }
-        | bool_pri IS FALSE_SYM
+        | bool_pri IS FALSE_SYM %prec IS
           { $$= new (YYTHD->mem_root) Item_func_isfalse($1); }
-        | bool_pri IS not FALSE_SYM
+        | bool_pri IS not FALSE_SYM %prec IS
           { $$= new (YYTHD->mem_root) Item_func_isnotfalse($1); }
-        | bool_pri IS UNKNOWN_SYM { $$= new Item_func_isnull($1); }
-        | bool_pri IS not UNKNOWN_SYM { $$= new Item_func_isnotnull($1); }
+        | bool_pri IS UNKNOWN_SYM %prec IS
+          { $$= new Item_func_isnull($1); }
+        | bool_pri IS not UNKNOWN_SYM %prec IS
+          { $$= new Item_func_isnotnull($1); }
         | bool_pri
         ;
 
 bool_pri:
-	bool_pri IS NULL_SYM	{ $$= new Item_func_isnull($1); }
-	| bool_pri IS not NULL_SYM { $$= new Item_func_isnotnull($1); }
-	| bool_pri EQUAL_SYM predicate	{ $$= new Item_func_equal($1,$3); }
+	bool_pri IS NULL_SYM %prec IS
+          { $$= new Item_func_isnull($1); }
+	| bool_pri IS not NULL_SYM %prec IS
+          { $$= new Item_func_isnotnull($1); }
+	| bool_pri EQUAL_SYM predicate %prec EQUAL_SYM
+          { $$= new Item_func_equal($1,$3); }
 	| bool_pri comp_op predicate %prec EQ
 	  { $$= (*$2)(0)->create($1,$3); }
 	| bool_pri comp_op all_or_any '(' subselect ')' %prec EQ
@@ -4595,40 +4647,36 @@ predicate:
 	| bit_expr ;
 
 bit_expr:
-	bit_expr '|' bit_term	{ $$= new Item_func_bit_or($1,$3); }
-	| bit_term ;
-
-bit_term:
-	bit_term '&' bit_factor	{ $$= new Item_func_bit_and($1,$3); }
-	| bit_factor ;
-
-bit_factor:
-	bit_factor SHIFT_LEFT value_expr
+          bit_expr '|' bit_expr %prec '|'
+          { $$= new Item_func_bit_or($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr '&' bit_expr %prec '&'
+          { $$= new Item_func_bit_and($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr SHIFT_LEFT bit_expr %prec SHIFT_LEFT
           { $$= new Item_func_shift_left($1,$3); }
-	| bit_factor SHIFT_RIGHT value_expr 
+        | bit_expr SHIFT_RIGHT bit_expr %prec SHIFT_RIGHT
           { $$= new Item_func_shift_right($1,$3); }
-	| value_expr ;
-
-value_expr:
-	value_expr '+' term	{ $$= new Item_func_plus($1,$3); }
-	| value_expr '-' term	{ $$= new Item_func_minus($1,$3); }
-	| value_expr '+' interval_expr interval
+        | bit_expr '+' bit_expr %prec '+'
+          { $$= new Item_func_plus($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr '-' bit_expr %prec '-'
+          { $$= new Item_func_minus($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr '+' interval_expr interval %prec '+'
           { $$= new Item_date_add_interval($1,$3,$4,0); }
-	| value_expr '-' interval_expr interval
+        | bit_expr '-' interval_expr interval %prec '-'
           { $$= new Item_date_add_interval($1,$3,$4,1); }
-	| term ;
-
-term:
-	term '*' factor		{ $$= new Item_func_mul($1,$3); }
-	| term '/' factor	{ $$= new Item_func_div($1,$3); }
-	| term '%' factor	{ $$= new Item_func_mod($1,$3); }
-	| term DIV_SYM factor	{ $$= new Item_func_int_div($1,$3); }
-	| term MOD_SYM factor	{ $$= new Item_func_mod($1,$3); }
-	| factor ;
-
-factor:
-        factor '^' simple_expr	{ $$= new Item_func_bit_xor($1,$3); }
-	| simple_expr ;
+        | bit_expr '*' bit_expr %prec '*'
+          { $$= new Item_func_mul($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr '/' bit_expr %prec '/'
+          { $$= new Item_func_div($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr '%' bit_expr %prec '%'
+          { $$= new Item_func_mod($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr DIV_SYM bit_expr %prec DIV_SYM
+          { $$= new Item_func_int_div($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr MOD_SYM bit_expr %prec MOD_SYM
+          { $$= new Item_func_mod($1,$3); }
+        | bit_expr '^' bit_expr
+          { $$= new Item_func_bit_xor($1,$3); }
+        | simple_expr
+        ;
 
 or:	OR_SYM | OR2_SYM;
 and:	AND_SYM | AND_AND_SYM;
@@ -4648,7 +4696,8 @@ all_or_any: ALL     { $$ = 1; }
         ;
 
 interval_expr:
-         INTERVAL_SYM expr { $$=$2; }
+          INTERVAL_SYM expr %prec INTERVAL_SYM
+          { $$=$2; }
         ;
 
 simple_expr: