Commit 601bdde5 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

very minor changes: a STOP SLAVE in a replication test to get rid of a non...

very minor changes: a STOP SLAVE in a replication test to get rid of a non critical message in slave.err,
and a comment update


mysql-test/r/rpl_server_id2.result:
  result update
mysql-test/t/rpl_server_id2.test:
  We stop the slave before cleaning up otherwise we'll get
  'drop table t1' executed twice, so an error in the slave.err
  (not critical).
sql/slave.cc:
  update comment about 4.1 now that 4.1 is fixed (in a few minutes, exactly)
parent 40dba5a8
...@@ -18,4 +18,5 @@ select * from t1; ...@@ -18,4 +18,5 @@ select * from t1;
n n
1 1
1 1
stop slave;
drop table t1; drop table t1;
...@@ -18,4 +18,8 @@ insert into t1 values (1); ...@@ -18,4 +18,8 @@ insert into t1 values (1);
save_master_pos; save_master_pos;
sync_with_master; sync_with_master;
select * from t1; # check that indeed 2 were inserted select * from t1; # check that indeed 2 were inserted
# We stop the slave before cleaning up otherwise we'll get
# 'drop table t1' executed twice, so an error in the slave.err
# (not critical).
stop slave;
drop table t1; drop table t1;
...@@ -2366,9 +2366,9 @@ static int exec_relay_log_event(THD* thd, RELAY_LOG_INFO* rli) ...@@ -2366,9 +2366,9 @@ static int exec_relay_log_event(THD* thd, RELAY_LOG_INFO* rli)
*/ */
/* /*
TODO: when this is merged into 4.1, one needs to update queue_event() to In 4.1, we updated queue_event() to add a similar test for
add a similar test for replicate_same_server_id, because in 4.1 the I/O replicate_same_server_id, because in 4.1 the I/O thread is also filtering
thread is also filtering events based on the server id. events based on the server id.
*/ */
if ((ev->server_id == (uint32) ::server_id && !replicate_same_server_id) || if ((ev->server_id == (uint32) ::server_id && !replicate_same_server_id) ||
(rli->slave_skip_counter && type_code != ROTATE_EVENT)) (rli->slave_skip_counter && type_code != ROTATE_EVENT))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment