Skip to content

M
mariadb
Commit f22a1bfd authored by unknown's avatar unknown
Browse files
Options

Docs/manual.texi 

    Updates for BACKUP TABLE/RESTORE TABLE
    Added Replication FAQ
    Cleaned up TODO list removing a duplicate and features already implemented
    Updated changelog for 3.23.25
sql/sql_lex.h
    Re-added backup_dir to Lex which dispappeared while resovling conflicts


Docs/manual.texi:
  Updates for BACKUP TABLE/RESTORE TABLE
  Added Replication FAQ
  Cleaned up TODO list removing a duplicate and features already implemented
  Updated changelog for 3.23.25
sql/sql_lex.h:
  Re-added backup_dir to Lex which dispappeared while resovling conflicts
parent ff1216a5
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 324 additions and 34 deletions
Docs/manual.texi
View file @ f22a1bfd
......@@ -334,6 +334,8 @@ MySQL language reference
* CHECK TABLE:: @code{CHECK TABLE} syntax
* ANALYZE TABLE:: @code{ANALYZE TABLE} syntax
* REPAIR TABLE:: @code{REPAIR TABLE} syntax
* BACKUP TABLE:: @code{BACKUP TABLE} syntax
* RESTORE TABLE:: @code{RESTORE TABLE} syntax
* DELETE:: @code{DELETE} syntax
* SELECT:: @code{SELECT} syntax
* JOIN:: @code{JOIN} syntax
......@@ -506,6 +508,7 @@ Replication in MySQL
* Replication Features:: Replication Features
* Replication Options:: Replication Options in my.cnf
* Replication SQL:: SQL Commands related to replication
* Replication FAQ:: Frequently asked questions about replication
Getting maximum performance from MySQL
......@@ -11861,6 +11864,8 @@ to restart @code{mysqld} with @code{--skip-grant-tables} to be able to run
* CHECK TABLE:: @code{CHECK TABLE} syntax
* ANALYZE TABLE:: @code{ANALYZE TABLE} syntax
* REPAIR TABLE:: @code{REPAIR TABLE} syntax
* BACKUP TABLE:: @code{BACKUP TABLE} syntax
* RESTORE TABLE:: @code{RESTORE TABLE} syntax
* DELETE:: @code{DELETE} syntax
* SELECT:: @code{SELECT} syntax
* JOIN:: @code{JOIN} syntax
......@@ -17173,8 +17178,65 @@ The different check types stand for the following:
@item @code{EXTENDED} @tab Do a full key lookup for all keys for each row. This ensures that the table is 100 % consistent, but will take a long time!
@end multitable
@findex BACKUP TABLE
@node BACKUP TABLE, RESTORE TABLE, CHECK TABLE, Reference
@section @code{BACKUP TABLE} syntax
@example
BACKUP TABLE tbl_name[,tbl_name...] TO '/path/to/backup/directory'
@end example
Make a copy of all the table files to the backup directory that are the
minimum needed to restore it. Currenlty only works for @code{MyISAM}
tables. For @code{MyISAM} table, copies @code{.frm} (definition) and
@code{.MYD} (data) files. The index file can be rebuilt from those two.
During the backup, read lock will be held for each table, one at time,
as they are being backed up. If you want to backup several tables as
a snapshot, you must first issue @code{LOCK TABLES} obtaining a read
lock for each table in the group.
The command returns a table with the following columns:
@multitable @columnfractions .35 .65
@item @strong{Column} @tab @strong{Value}
@item Table @tab Table name
@item Op @tab Always ``backup''
@item Msg_type @tab One of @code{status}, @code{error}, @code{info} or @code{warning}.
@item Msg_text @tab The message.
@end multitable
@findex RESTORE TABLE
@node RESTORE TABLE, ANALYZE TABLE, BACKUP TABLE, Reference
@section @code{RESTORE TABLE} syntax
@example
RESTORE TABLE tbl_name[,tbl_name...] FROM '/path/to/backup/directory'
@end example
Restores the table(s) from the backup that was made with
@code{BACKUP TABLE}. Existing tables will not be overwritten - if you
try to restore over an existing table, you will get an error. Restore
will take longer than BACKUP due to the need to rebuilt the index. The
more keys you have, the longer it is going to take. Just as
@code{BACKUP TABLE}, currently only works of @code{MyISAM} tables.
The command returns a table with the following columns:
@multitable @columnfractions .35 .65
@item @strong{Column} @tab @strong{Value}
@item Table @tab Table name
@item Op @tab Always ``restore''
@item Msg_type @tab One of @code{status}, @code{error}, @code{info} or @code{warning}.
@item Msg_text @tab The message.
@end multitable
@findex ANALYZE TABLE
@node ANALYZE TABLE, REPAIR TABLE, CHECK TABLE, Reference
@node ANALYZE TABLE, REPAIR TABLE, RESTORE TABLE, Reference
@section @code{ANALYZE TABLE} syntax
@example
......@@ -23545,6 +23607,7 @@ tables}.
* Replication Features:: Replication Features
* Replication Options:: Replication Options in my.cnf
* Replication SQL:: SQL Commands related to replication
* Replication FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions about replication
@end menu
@node Replication Intro, Replication Implementation, Replication, Replication
......@@ -23719,14 +23782,14 @@ of the are available starting in 3.23.15 unless indicated otherwise.
@item @strong{Option} @tab @strong{Description}
@item
@code{log-bin}
@tab Should be set on the master. Tells it to keep a binary update log.
@tab Should be set on the master. Tells it to keep a binary update log.
If a parameter is specified, the log will be written to the specified
location.
(Set on @strong{Master}, Example: @code{log-bin})
@item
@code{log-bin-index}
@tab Because the user could issue @code{FLUSH LOGS} command, we need to
@tab Because the user could issue @code{FLUSH LOGS} command, we need to
know which log is currently active and which ones have been rotated out
and it what sequence. This info is stored in the binary log index file.
The default is `hostname`.index . You can use this option
......@@ -23735,40 +23798,40 @@ if you want to be a rebel.
@item
@code{master-host}
@tab Master hostname or IP address for replication. If not set, the slave
@tab Master hostname or IP address for replication. If not set, the slave
thread will not be started.
(Set on @strong{Slave}, Example: @code{master-host=db-master.mycompany.com})
@item
@code{master-user}
@tab The user the slave thread will authenticate as when connecting to
@tab The user the slave thread will authenticate as when connecting to
the master. The user must have @code{FILE} privilige. If the master user
is not set, user @code{test} is assumed.
(Set on @strong{Slave}, Example: @code{master-user=scott})
@item
@code{master-password}
@tab The password the slave thread will authenticate with when connecting
@tab The password the slave thread will authenticate with when connecting
to the master. If not set, empty password is assumed
(Set on @strong{Slave}, Example: @code{master-password=tiger})
@item
@code{master-port}
@tab The port the master is listening on. If not set, the compiled setting
@tab The port the master is listening on. If not set, the compiled setting
of @code{MYSQL_PORT} is assumed. If you have not tinkered with @code{configure}
options, this should be 3306.
(Set on @strong{Slave}, Example: @code{master-port=3306})
@item
@code{master-connect-retry}
@tab The number of seconds the slave thread will sleep before retrying to
@tab The number of seconds the slave thread will sleep before retrying to
connect to the master in case the master goes down or the connection is lost.
Default is 60.
(Set on @strong{Slave}, Example: @code{master-connect-retry=60})
@item
@code{master-info-file}
@tab The location of the file that remembers where we left off on the master
@tab The location of the file that remembers where we left off on the master
during the replication process. The default is master.info in the data
directory. Sasha: The only reason I see for ever changing the default
is the desire to be rebelious.
......@@ -23776,7 +23839,7 @@ is the desire to be rebelious.
@item
@code{replicate-do-db}
@tab Tells the slave thread to restrict replication to the specified database.
@tab Tells the slave thread to restrict replication to the specified database.
To specify more than one database, use the directive multiple times, once for
each database. Note that this will only work if you do not use cross-database
queries such as @code{UPDATE some_db.some_table SET foo='bar'} while having
......@@ -23785,7 +23848,7 @@ selected a different or no database.
@item
@code{replicate-ignore-db}
@tab Tells the slave thread to not replicate to the specified database. To
@tab Tells the slave thread to not replicate to the specified database. To
specify more than one database to ignore, use the directive multiple times,
once for each database. You must not use cross database updates for this
option.
......@@ -23793,32 +23856,32 @@ option.
@item
@code{sql-bin-update-same}
@tab If set, setting @code{SQL_LOG_BIN} to a value will automatically set
@tab If set, setting @code{SQL_LOG_BIN} to a value will automatically set
@code{SQL_LOG_UPDATE} to the same value and vice versa.
(Set on @strong{Master}, Example: @code{sql-bin-update-same})
@item
@code{log-slave-updates}
@tab Tells the slave to log the updates from the slave thread to the binary
@tab Tells the slave to log the updates from the slave thread to the binary
log. Off by default. You will need to turn it on if you plan to daisy-chain
the slaves
(Set on @strong{Slave}, Example: @code{log-slave-updates})
@item
@code{binlog-do-db}
@tab Tells the master it should log updates for the specified database, and
@tab Tells the master it should log updates for the specified database, and
exclude all others not explicitly mentioned.
(Set on @strong{Master}, Example: @code{binlog-do-db=some_database})
@item
@code{binlog-ignore-db}
@tab Tells the master that updates to the given database should not be logged
@tab Tells the master that updates to the given database should not be logged
to the binary log
(Set on @strong{Master}, Example: @code{binlog-ignore-db=some_database})
@end multitable
@node Replication SQL, , Replication Options, Replication
@node Replication SQL, Replication FAQ, Replication Options, Replication
@section SQL commands related to replication
Replication can be controlled through the SQL interface. Below is the
......@@ -23828,30 +23891,30 @@ summary of commands:
@item @strong{Command} @tab @strong{Description}
@item @code{SLAVE START}
@tab Starts the slave thread. (Slave)
@tab Starts the slave thread. (Slave)
@item @code{SLAVE STOP}
@tab Stops the slave thread. (Slave)
@tab Stops the slave thread. (Slave)
@item @code{SET SQL_LOG_BIN=0}
@tab Disables update logging (Master)
@tab Disables update logging (Master)
@item @code{SET SQL_LOG_BIN=1}
@tab Re-enable update logging (Master)
@tab Re-enable update logging (Master)
@item @code{FLUSH MASTER}
@tab Deletes all binary logs listed in the index file, resetting the binlog
@tab Deletes all binary logs listed in the index file, resetting the binlog
index file to be empty. (Master)
@item @code{FLUSH SLAVE}
@tab Makes the slave forget its replication position in the master
@tab Makes the slave forget its replication position in the master
logs. (Slave)
@item @code{LOAD TABLE tblname FROM MASTER}
@tab Downloads a copy of the table from master to the slave. (Slave)
@tab Downloads a copy of the table from master to the slave. (Slave)
@item @code{CHANGE MASTER TO master_def_list}
@tab Changes the master parameters to the values specified in
@tab Changes the master parameters to the values specified in
@code{master_def_list} and restarts the slave thread. @code{master_def_list}
is a comma-separated list of @code{master_def} where @code{master_def} is
one of the following: @code{MASTER_HOST}, @code{MASTER_USER},
......@@ -23880,13 +23943,235 @@ restarting, and the slave will read its master from @code{my.cnf} or the
command line. (Slave)
@item @code{SHOW MASTER STATUS}
@tab Provides status info on the binlog of the master. (Master)
@tab Provides status info on the binlog of the master. (Master)
@item @code{SHOW SLAVE STATUS}
@tab Provides status info on essential parameters of the slave thread. (Slave)
@tab Provides status info on essential parameters of the slave thread. (Slave)
@end multitable
@node Replication FAQ, , Replication SQL, Replication
@section Replication FAQ
@strong{Q}: Why do I sometimes see more than one @code{Binlog_Dump} thread on
the master after I have restarted the slave?
@strong{A}: @code{Binlog_Dump} is a continuous process that is handled by the
server the following way:
@itemize
@item
catch up on the updates
@item
once there are no more updates left, go into @code{pthread_cond_wait()},
from which we can be woken up either by an update or a kill
@item
on wake up, check the reason, if we are not supposed to die, continue
the @code{Binlog_dump} loop
@item
if there is some fatal error, such as detecting a dead client,
terminate the loop
@end itemize
So if the slave thread stops on the slave, the corresponding
@code{Binlog_Dump} thread on the master will not notice it until after
at least one update to the master ( or a kill), which is needed to wake
it up from @code{pthread_cond_wait()}. In the meantime, the slave
could have opened another connection, which resulted in another
@code{Binlog_Dump} thread.
Once we add @strong{server_id} variable for each server that
participates in replication, we will fix @code{Binlog_Dump} thread to
kill all the zombies from the same slave on reconnect.
@strong{Q}: What issues should I be aware of when setting up two-way
replication?
@strong{A}: @strong{MySQL} replication currently does not support any
locking protocol between master and slave to guarantee the atomicity of
a distributed ( cross-server) update. In in other words, it is possible
for client A to make an update to co-master 1, and in the meantime,
before it propogates to co-master 2, client B could make an update to
co-master 2 that will make the update of client A work differently than
it did on co-master 1. Thus when the update of client A will make it
to co-master 2, it will produce tables that will be different than
what you have on co-master 1, even after all the updates from co-master
2 have also propogated. So you should not co-chain two servers in a
two-way replication relationship, unless you are sure that you updates
can safely happen in any order, or unless you take care of mis-ordered
updates somehow in the client code.
Until we implement @code{server_id} variable, you cannot have more than
two servers in a co-master replication relationship, and you must
run @code{mysqld} without @code{log-slave-updates} (default) to avoid
infinite update loops.
You must also realize that two-way replication actually does not improve
performance very much, if at all, as far as updates are concerned. Both
servers need to do the same amount of updates each, as you would have
one server do. The only difference is that there will be a little less
lock contention, because the updates originating on another server will
be serialized in one slave thread. This benefit, though, might be
offset by network delays.
@strong{Q}: How can I use replication to improve performance of my system?
@strong{A}: You should set up one server as the master, and direct all
writes to it, and configure as many slaves as you have the money and
rackspace for, distributing the reads among the master and the slaves.
@strong{Q}: What should I do to prepare my client code to use
performance-enhancing replication?
@strong{A}:
If the part of your code that is responsible for database access has
been properly abstracted/modularized, converting it to run with the
replicated setup should be very smooth and easy - just change the
implementation of your database access to read from some slave or the
master, and to awlays write to the master. If your code does not have
this level of abstraction,
setting up a replicated system will give you an opportunity/motivation
to it clean up.
You should start by creating a wrapper library
/module with the following functions:
@itemize
@item
@code{safe_writer_connect()}
@item
@code{safe_reader_connect()}
@item
@code{safe_reader_query()}
@item
@code{safe_writer_query()}
@end itemize
@code{safe_} means that the function will take care of handling all
the error conditions.
You should then convert your client code to use the wrapper library.
It may be a painful and scary process at first, but it will pay off in
the long run. All application that follow the above pattern will be
able to take advantage of one-master/many slaves solution. The
code will be a lot easier to maintain, and adding troubleshooting
options will be trivial - you will just need to modify one or two
functions, for example, to log how long each query took, or which
query, among your many thousands, gave you an error. If you have written a lot of code already,
you may want to automate the conversion task by using Monty's
@code{replace} utility, which comes with the standard distribution of
@strong{MySQL}, or just write your own Perl script. Hopefully, your
code follows some recognizable pattern. If not, then you are probably
better off re-writing it anyway, or at least going through and manually
beating it into a pattern.
Note that, of course, you can use different names for the
functions. What is important is having unified interface for connecting
for reads, connecting for writes, doing a read, and doing a write.
@strong{Q}: When and how much can @code{MySQL} replication improve the performance
of my system?
@strong{A}: @strong{MySQL} replication is most benefitial for a system
with frequent reads and not so frequent writes. In theory, by using a
one master/many slaves setup you can scale by adding more slaves until
you either run out of network bandwidth, or your update
load grows to the point
that the master cannot handle it.
In order to determine how many slaves you can get before the added
benefits begin to level out, and how much you can improve performance
of your site, you need to know your query patterns, and empirically
(by benchmarking) determine the relationship between the throughput
on reads ( reads per second, or @code{max_reads}) and on writes
@code{max_writes}) on a typical master and a typical slave. The
example below will show you a rather simplified calculation of what you
can get with replication for our imagined system.
Let's say our system load consist of 10% writes and 90% reads, and we
have determined that @code{max_reads} = 1200 - 2 * @code{max_writes},
or in other words, our system can do 1200 reads per second with no
writes, our average write is twice as slow as average read,
and the relationship is
linear. Let us suppose that our master and slave are of the same
capacity, and we have N slaves and 1 master. Then we have for each
server ( master or slave):
@code{reads = 1200 - 2 * writes} ( from bencmarks)
@code{reads = 9* writes / (N + 1) } ( reads split, but writes go
to all servers)
@code{9*writes/(N+1) + 2 * writes = 1200}
@code{writes = 1200/(2 + 9/(N+1)}
So if N = 0, which means we have no replication, our system can handle
1200/11, about 109 writes per second ( which means we will have 9 times
as many reads to to the nature of our application)
If N = 1, we can get up to 184 writes per second
If N = 8, we get up to 400
If N = 17, 480 writes
Eventually as N approaches infinity ( and our budget negative infinity),
we can get very close to 600 writes per second, increasing system
throughput about 5.5 times. However, with only 8 servers, we increased
it almost 4 times already.
Note that our computations assumed infitine network bandwidth, and
neglected several other factors that could turn out to be signficant on
your system. In many cases, you may not be able to make a computation
similar to the one above that will accurately predict what will happen
on your system if you add N replication slaves. However, answering the
following questions should help you decided whether and how much if at
all the replication will improve the performance of your system:
@itemize
@item
What is the read/write ratio on your system?
@item
How much more write load can one server handle if you reduce the reads?
@item
How many slaves do you have bandwidth for on your network?
@end itemize
@strong{Q}: How can I use replication to provide redundancy/high
availability?
@strong{A}: With the currently available features, you would have to
set up a master and a slave (or several slaves), and write a script
that will monitor the
master to see if it is up, and instruct your applications and
the slaves of the master change in case of failure. Some suggestions:
@itemize
@item
To tell a slave to change the master use @code{CHANGE MASTER TO} command
@item
A good way to keep your applications informed where the master is is by
having a dynamic DNS entry for the master. With @strong{bind} you can
use @code{nsupdate} to dynamically update your DNS
@item
You should run your slaves with @code{log-bin} option and without
@code{log-slave-updates}. This way the slave will be ready to become a
master as soon as you issue @code{STOP SLAVE}; @code{FLUSH MASTER}, and
@code{CHANGE MASTER TO} on the other slaves. It will also help you catch
spurious updates that may happen because of misconfiguration of the
slave ( ideally, you want to configure access rights so that no client
can update the slave, except for the slave thread) combined with the
bugs in your client programs ( they should never update the slave
directly).
@end itemize
We are currently working on intergrating an automatic master election
system into @strong{MySQL}, but until it is ready, you will have to
create your own monitoring tools .
@cindex Performance
@cindex Optimization
@node Performance, MySQL Benchmarks, Replication, Top
......@@ -36291,6 +36576,14 @@ though, so 3.23 is not released as a stable version yet.
@appendixsubsec Changes in release 3.23.25
@itemize @bullet
@item
Fixed wrong time for @code{Connect} state of the slave thread in
@code{processlist}
@item
Added logging to @code{--log} on the slave of successful connect to
the master
@item
Added @code{BACKUP TABLE} and @code{RESTORE TABLE}
@item
@code{HEAP} tables didn't use keys properly. (Bug from 3.23.23)
@item
Added better support for @code{MERGE} tables (keys, mapping, creation,
......@@ -36421,7 +36714,7 @@ Fixed @code{INSERT INTO bdb_table ... SELECT} to work with BDB tables.
@code{CHECK TABLE} now updates key statistics for the table.
@item
@code{ANALYZE TABLE} will now only update tables that have been changed
since thee last @code{ANALYZE}. Note that this is a new feature and tables
since the last @code{ANALYZE}. Note that this is a new feature and tables
will not be marked to be analyzed until they are updated in any way with
3.23.23 or newer. For older tables, you have to do @code{CHECK TABLE}
to update the key distribution.
......@@ -40748,10 +41041,8 @@ show columns from t2;
@item
Implement function: @code{get_changed_tables(timeout,table1,table2,...)}
@item
Atomic updates; This includes a language that one can even use for
a set of stored procedures.
@item
@code{update items,month set items.price=month.price where items.id=month.id;}
Atomic multi-table updates, eg @code{update items,month set
items.price=month.price where items.id=month.id;};
@item
Change reading through tables to use memmap when possible. Now only
compressed tables use memmap.
......@@ -40835,8 +41126,6 @@ Use @code{NULL} instead.
@item
Add full support for @code{JOIN} with parentheses.
@item
Reuse threads for systems with a lot of connections.
@item
As an alternative for one thread / connection manage a pool of threads
to handle the queries.
@item
sql/sql_lex.h
View file @ f22a1bfd
......@@ -125,7 +125,8 @@ typedef struct st_lex {
udf_func udf;
HA_CHECK_OPT check_opt; // check/repair options
HA_CREATE_INFO create_info;
LEX_MASTER_INFO mi; // used by CHANGE MASTER
LEX_MASTER_INFO mi; // used by CHANGE MASTER
char* backup_dir; // used by RESTORE/BACKUP
ulong thread_id,type;
ulong options;
enum_sql_command sql_command;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7