Commit 9c2bfa32 authored by Jérome Perrin's avatar Jérome Perrin

CodingStyle: verify that business template re-exporting is stable

re-exporting a business template that was just installed should not be
different.

By having a test reporting diffs in export, we can detect changes in ERP5 or
dependencies which would cause the business template format to become different.
The primary reason for doing this was to make sure that on the way to Zope4 we
don't have changes in exported data, especially lossly changes that would not
be detected in test suite, but this is also good because it helps detecting
changes that cause a difference in output - then if we introduce a change that
cause different business template export, we also have to make a change to
re-export everything to new format, which helps keeping the git history cleaner
because there's one big commit with all the changes instead of having many small
commits. This is also good because it detects mistakes when modifying business
templates files directly with a text editor.

The test can be configured to ignore some paths, using fnmatch pattern (which
unlike business patterns do not support ** for recursive match). This is also
helpful when using this test case to check customer configuration business
templates, where we may want to ignore some PathTemplateItem for convenience.
parent 979b7b08
Pipeline #20137 passed with stage
in 0 seconds
......@@ -28,9 +28,13 @@
##############################################################################
import collections
import difflib
import filecmp
import fnmatch
import glob
import os
import tarfile
import shutil
import tempfile
from Acquisition import aq_base
from Testing import ZopeTestCase
......@@ -105,29 +109,84 @@ class CodingStyleTestCase(ERP5TypeTestCase):
for business_template in self._getTestedBusinessTemplateValueList():
self.assertEqual(business_template.BusinessTemplate_getPythonSourceCodeMessageList(), [])
# Paths for which we ignore differences when re-exporting business templates
rebuild_business_template_ignored_path = """
# portal_transforms seem to be always different
erp5_core/ToolTemplateItem/portal_transforms.xml
# Empty messages are exported in message catalog, so they can be different because of
# empty messages. Reindexing during creation for example insert entries for all workflow
# states, so this change often.
*/MessageTranslationTemplateItem/*/*/translation.po
# This seem to be a copy of
# bt5/erp5_configurator_standard/PathTemplateItem/business_configuration_module/default_standard_configuration.xml
# that was modified. When re-exporting it is different, but since this is test data we ignore it for now.
erp5_scalability_test/PathTemplateItem/business_configuration_module/default_standard_configuration.xml
erp5_scalability_test/PathTemplateItem/business_configuration_module/default_standard_configuration/*
# This is different for some unknown reason, because it's test data we ignore for now
erp5_payroll_l10n_fr_test/PathTemplateItem/accounting_module/trainee_january.xml
erp5_payroll_l10n_fr_test/PathTemplateItem/accounting_module/trainee_january/*
"""
def test_rebuild_business_template(self):
"""Try to rebuild business template to catch packaging errors.
"""Try to rebuild business template to catch packaging errors and make sur output is stable.
"""
self.maxDiff = None
template_tool = self.portal.portal_templates
for bt_title in self.getTestedBusinessTemplateList():
bt = template_tool.getInstalledBusinessTemplate(bt_title, strict=True)
# make sure we can rebuild
bt.build()
# check we don't add or remove members.
# first, build a set of files that were on the original business template repository
base_path, local_path = self.portal.portal_templates.getLastestBTOnRepos(bt_title)
existing_files = set([os.path.relpath(y, base_path)
for x in os.walk(os.path.join(base_path, local_path))
for y in glob.glob(os.path.join(x[0], '*')) if os.path.isfile(y)])
# Compute the differences between the reference business template
# from the working copy and the newly exported business template.
bt_base_path, bt_local_path = self.portal.portal_templates.getLastestBTOnRepos(bt_title)
bt_dir = os.path.join(bt_base_path, bt_local_path)
export_base_path = tempfile.mkdtemp()
self.addCleanup(shutil.rmtree, export_base_path)
export_dir = os.path.join(export_base_path, bt_local_path)
bt.export(export_dir, local=True)
# then compare this with the files in the newly exported business template.
bt_file = bt.export()
bt_file.seek(0) # XXX this StringIO was already read...
new_files = set(tarfile.open(fileobj=bt_file, mode='r:gz').getnames())
ignored_paths = {
p.strip() for p in self.rebuild_business_template_ignored_path.splitlines()
if p and not p.strip().startswith("#")}
diff_line_list = []
def get_differences(dcmp, base):
for name in dcmp.left_only:
yield 'removed: ' + os.path.join(base, name)
for name in dcmp.right_only:
yield 'added: ' + os.path.join(base, name)
for name in dcmp.funny_files:
yield 'funny: ' + os.path.join(base, name)
for name in dcmp.diff_files:
path = os.path.join(base, name)
if not any(fnmatch.fnmatch(path, ignored_path) for ignored_path in ignored_paths):
yield 'modified: ' + path
with open(os.path.join(bt_base_path, path)) as ff, \
open(os.path.join(export_base_path, path)) as tf:
diff_line_list.extend(
difflib.unified_diff(
ff.readlines(),
tf.readlines(),
os.path.join('git', path),
os.path.join('bt5', path),
))
diff_line_list.append('\n')
for sub_path, sub_dcmp in dcmp.subdirs.iteritems():
for diff in get_differences(sub_dcmp, os.path.join(base, sub_path)):
yield diff
diff_files = list(get_differences(filecmp.dircmp(bt_dir, export_dir), bt_local_path))
# dump a diff in log directory, to help debugging
from Products.ERP5Type.tests.runUnitTest import log_directory
if log_directory and diff_line_list:
with open(os.path.join(log_directory, '%s.diff' % self.id()), 'w') as f:
f.writelines(diff_line_list)
self.assertEqual(diff_files, [])
self.maxDiff = None
self.assertEqual(existing_files, new_files)
def test_run_upgrader(self):
# Check that pre and post upgrade do not raise problems.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment