Commit d4337590 authored by Marcia Ramos's avatar Marcia Ramos

Merge branch '26159-combine-frontend-and-backend-testing-level-documentation' into 'master'

Combine frontend and backend testing level documentation

Closes #26159

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!22906
parents cb64643c 196f3332
......@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ Testing the `hasMetricTypes` computed prop would seem like a given, but to test
Keep an eye out for these kinds of tests, as they just make updating logic more fragile and tedious than it needs to be. This is also true for other libraries.
Some more examples can be found further down [below](#unit-testing-guidelines)
Some more examples can be found in the [Frontend unit tests section](testing_levels.md#frontend-unit-tests)
### Don't test your mock
......@@ -749,433 +749,22 @@ end
## Overview of Frontend Testing Levels
Main information on frontend testing levels can be found in the [Testing Levels page](testing_levels.md).
Tests relevant for frontend development can be found at the following places:
- `spec/javascripts/` which are run by Karma (command: `yarn karma`) and contain
- [frontend unit tests](#frontend-unit-tests)
- [frontend component tests](#frontend-component-tests)
- [frontend integration tests](#frontend-integration-tests)
- `spec/frontend/` which are run by Jest (command: `yarn jest`) and contain
- [frontend unit tests](#frontend-unit-tests)
- [frontend component tests](#frontend-component-tests)
- [frontend integration tests](#frontend-integration-tests)
- `spec/features/` which are run by RSpec and contain
- [feature tests](#feature-tests)
- `spec/javascripts/`, for Karma tests
- `spec/frontend/`, for Jest tests
- `spec/features/`, for RSpec tests
RSpec runs complete [feature tests](testing_levels.md#frontend-feature-tests), while the Jest and Karma directories contain [frontend unit tests](testing_levels.md#frontend-unit-tests), [frontend component tests](testing_levels.md#frontend-component-tests), and [frontend integration tests](testing_levels.md#frontend-integration-tests).
All tests in `spec/javascripts/` will eventually be migrated to `spec/frontend/` (see also [#52483](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/52483)).
In addition, there used to be feature tests in `features/`, run by Spinach.
These were removed from the codebase in May 2018 ([#23036](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/23036)).
Before May 2018, `features/` also contained feature tests run by Spinach. These tests were removed from the codebase in May 2018 ([#23036](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/23036)).
See also [Notes on testing Vue components](../fe_guide/vue.html#testing-vue-components).
### Frontend unit tests
Unit tests are on the lowest abstraction level and typically test functionality that is not directly perceivable by a user.
```mermaid
graph RL
plain[Plain JavaScript];
Vue[Vue Components];
feature-flags[Feature Flags];
license-checks[License Checks];
plain---Vuex;
plain---GraphQL;
Vue---plain;
Vue---Vuex;
Vue---GraphQL;
browser---plain;
browser---Vue;
plain---backend;
Vuex---backend;
GraphQL---backend;
Vue---backend;
backend---database;
backend---feature-flags;
backend---license-checks;
class plain tested;
class Vuex tested;
classDef node color:#909090,fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-width:2px,stroke:#909090
classDef label stroke-width:0;
classDef tested color:#000000,fill:#a0c0ff,stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
subgraph " "
tested;
mocked;
class tested tested;
end
```
<div id="unit-testing-guidelines"></div>
#### When to use unit tests
<details>
<summary>exported functions and classes</summary>
Anything that is exported can be reused at various places in a way you have no control over.
Therefore it is necessary to document the expected behavior of the public interface with tests.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Vuex actions</summary>
Any Vuex action needs to work in a consistent way independent of the component it is triggered from.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Vuex mutations</summary>
For complex Vuex mutations it helps to identify the source of a problem by separating the tests from other parts of the Vuex store.
</details>
#### When *not* to use unit tests
<details>
<summary>non-exported functions or classes</summary>
Anything that is not exported from a module can be considered private or an implementation detail and doesn't need to be tested.
</details>
<details>
<summary>constants</summary>
Testing the value of a constant would mean to copy it.
This results in extra effort without additional confidence that the value is correct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Vue components</summary>
Computed properties, methods, and lifecycle hooks can be considered an implementation detail of components and don't need to be tested.
They are implicitly covered by component tests.
The <a href="https://vue-test-utils.vuejs.org/guides/#getting-started">official Vue guidelines</a> suggest the same.
</details>
#### What to mock in unit tests
<details>
<summary>state of the class under test</summary>
Modifying the state of the class under test directly rather than using methods of the class avoids side-effects in test setup.
</details>
<details>
<summary>other exported classes</summary>
Every class needs to be tested in isolation to prevent test scenarios from growing exponentially.
</details>
<details>
<summary>single DOM elements if passed as parameters</summary>
For tests that only operate on single DOM elements rather than a whole page, creating these elements is cheaper than loading a whole HTML fixture.
</details>
<details>
<summary>all server requests</summary>
When running frontend unit tests, the backend may not be reachable.
Therefore all outgoing requests need to be mocked.
</details>
<details>
<summary>asynchronous background operations</summary>
Background operations cannot be stopped or waited on, so they will continue running in the following tests and cause side effects.
</details>
#### What *not* to mock in unit tests
<details>
<summary>non-exported functions or classes</summary>
Everything that is not exported can be considered private to the module and will be implicitly tested via the exported classes / functions.
</details>
<details>
<summary>methods of the class under test</summary>
By mocking methods of the class under test, the mocks will be tested and not the real methods.
</details>
<details>
<summary>utility functions (pure functions, or those that only modify parameters)</summary>
If a function has no side effects because it has no state, it is safe to not mock it in tests.
</details>
<details>
<summary>full HTML pages</summary>
Loading the HTML of a full page slows down tests, so it should be avoided in unit tests.
</details>
### Frontend component tests
Component tests cover the state of a single component that is perceivable by a user depending on external signals such as user input, events fired from other components, or application state.
```mermaid
graph RL
plain[Plain JavaScript];
Vue[Vue Components];
feature-flags[Feature Flags];
license-checks[License Checks];
plain---Vuex;
plain---GraphQL;
Vue---plain;
Vue---Vuex;
Vue---GraphQL;
browser---plain;
browser---Vue;
plain---backend;
Vuex---backend;
GraphQL---backend;
Vue---backend;
backend---database;
backend---feature-flags;
backend---license-checks;
class Vue tested;
classDef node color:#909090,fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-width:2px,stroke:#909090
classDef label stroke-width:0;
classDef tested color:#000000,fill:#a0c0ff,stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
subgraph " "
tested;
mocked;
class tested tested;
end
```
#### When to use component tests
- Vue components
#### When *not* to use component tests
<details>
<summary>Vue applications</summary>
Vue applications may contain many components.
Testing them on a component level requires too much effort.
Therefore they are tested on frontend integration level.
</details>
<details>
<summary>HAML templates</summary>
HAML templates contain only Markup and no frontend-side logic.
Therefore they are not complete components.
</details>
#### What to mock in component tests
<details>
<summary>DOM</summary>
Operating on the real DOM is significantly slower than on the virtual DOM.
</details>
<details>
<summary>properties and state of the component under test</summary>
Similarly to testing classes, modifying the properties directly (rather than relying on methods of the component) avoids side-effects.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Vuex store</summary>
To avoid side effects and keep component tests simple, Vuex stores are replaced with mocks.
</details>
<details>
<summary>all server requests</summary>
Similar to unit tests, when running component tests, the backend may not be reachable.
Therefore all outgoing requests need to be mocked.
</details>
<details>
<summary>asynchronous background operations</summary>
Similar to unit tests, background operations cannot be stopped or waited on, so they will continue running in the following tests and cause side effects.
</details>
<details>
<summary>child components</summary>
Every component is tested individually, so child components are mocked.
See also <a href="https://vue-test-utils.vuejs.org/api/#shallowmount">shallowMount()</a>
</details>
#### What *not* to mock in component tests
<details>
<summary>methods or computed properties of the component under test</summary>
By mocking part of the component under test, the mocks will be tested and not the real component.
</details>
<details>
<summary>functions and classes independent from Vue</summary>
All plain JavaScript code is already covered by unit tests and needs not to be mocked in component tests.
</details>
### Frontend integration tests
Integration tests cover the interaction between all components on a single page.
Their abstraction level is comparable to how a user would interact with the UI.
```mermaid
graph RL
plain[Plain JavaScript];
Vue[Vue Components];
feature-flags[Feature Flags];
license-checks[License Checks];
plain---Vuex;
plain---GraphQL;
Vue---plain;
Vue---Vuex;
Vue---GraphQL;
browser---plain;
browser---Vue;
plain---backend;
Vuex---backend;
GraphQL---backend;
Vue---backend;
backend---database;
backend---feature-flags;
backend---license-checks;
class plain tested;
class Vue tested;
class Vuex tested;
class GraphQL tested;
class browser tested;
linkStyle 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
classDef node color:#909090,fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-width:2px,stroke:#909090
classDef label stroke-width:0;
classDef tested color:#000000,fill:#a0c0ff,stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
subgraph " "
tested;
mocked;
class tested tested;
end
```
#### When to use integration tests
<details>
<summary>page bundles (<code>index.js</code> files in <code>app/assets/javascripts/pages/</code>)</summary>
Testing the page bundles ensures the corresponding frontend components integrate well.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Vue applications outside of page bundles</summary>
Testing Vue applications as a whole ensures the corresponding frontend components integrate well.
</details>
#### What to mock in integration tests
<details>
<summary>HAML views (use fixtures instead)</summary>
Rendering HAML views requires a Rails environment including a running database which we cannot rely on in frontend tests.
</details>
<details>
<summary>all server requests</summary>
Similar to unit and component tests, when running component tests, the backend may not be reachable.
Therefore all outgoing requests need to be mocked.
</details>
<details>
<summary>asynchronous background operations that are not perceivable on the page</summary>
Background operations that affect the page need to be tested on this level.
All other background operations cannot be stopped or waited on, so they will continue running in the following tests and cause side effects.
</details>
#### What *not* to mock in integration tests
<details>
<summary>DOM</summary>
Testing on the real DOM ensures our components work in the environment they are meant for.
Part of this will be delegated to <a href="https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/team-tasks/issues/45">cross-browser testing</a>.
</details>
<details>
<summary>properties or state of components</summary>
On this level, all tests can only perform actions a user would do.
For example to change the state of a component, a click event would be fired.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Vuex stores</summary>
When testing the frontend code of a page as a whole, the interaction between Vue components and Vuex stores is covered as well.
</details>
### Feature tests
In contrast to [frontend integration tests](#frontend-integration-tests), feature tests make requests against the real backend instead of using fixtures.
This also implies that database queries are executed which makes this category significantly slower.
See also
- The [RSpec testing guidelines](../testing_guide/best_practices.md#rspec).
- System / Feature tests in the [Testing Best Practices](best_practices.md#system--feature-tests).
- [Issue #26159](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/26159) which aims at combine those guidelines with this page.
```mermaid
graph RL
plain[Plain JavaScript];
Vue[Vue Components];
feature-flags[Feature Flags];
license-checks[License Checks];
plain---Vuex;
plain---GraphQL;
Vue---plain;
Vue---Vuex;
Vue---GraphQL;
browser---plain;
browser---Vue;
plain---backend;
Vuex---backend;
GraphQL---backend;
Vue---backend;
backend---database;
backend---feature-flags;
backend---license-checks;
class backend tested;
class plain tested;
class Vue tested;
class Vuex tested;
class GraphQL tested;
class browser tested;
linkStyle 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
classDef node color:#909090,fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-width:2px,stroke:#909090
classDef label stroke-width:0;
classDef tested color:#000000,fill:#a0c0ff,stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
subgraph " "
tested;
mocked;
class tested tested;
end
```
#### When to use feature tests
- Use cases that require a backend and cannot be tested using fixtures.
- Behavior that is not part of a page bundle but defined globally.
#### Relevant notes
A `:js` flag is added to the test to make sure the full environment is loaded.
```ruby
scenario 'successfully', :js do
sign_in(create(:admin))
end
```
The steps of each test are written using capybara methods ([documentation](https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/capybara)).
Bear in mind <abbr title="XMLHttpRequest">XHR</abbr> calls might require you to use `wait_for_requests` in between steps, like so:
```ruby
find('.form-control').native.send_keys(:enter)
wait_for_requests
expect(page).not_to have_selector('.card')
```
## Test helpers
### Vuex Helper: `testAction`
......
......@@ -51,6 +51,167 @@ records should use stubs/doubles as much as possible.
| `rubocop/` | `spec/rubocop/` | RSpec | |
| `spec/factories` | `spec/factories_spec.rb` | RSpec | |
### Frontend unit tests
Unit tests are on the lowest abstraction level and typically test functionality
that is not directly perceivable by a user.
```mermaid
graph RL
plain[Plain JavaScript];
Vue[Vue Components];
feature-flags[Feature Flags];
license-checks[License Checks];
plain---Vuex;
plain---GraphQL;
Vue---plain;
Vue---Vuex;
Vue---GraphQL;
browser---plain;
browser---Vue;
plain---backend;
Vuex---backend;
GraphQL---backend;
Vue---backend;
backend---database;
backend---feature-flags;
backend---license-checks;
class plain tested;
class Vuex tested;
classDef node color:#909090,fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-width:2px,stroke:#909090
classDef label stroke-width:0;
classDef tested color:#000000,fill:#a0c0ff,stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
subgraph " "
tested;
mocked;
class tested tested;
end
```
#### When to use unit tests
- **Exported functions and classes**:
Anything exported can be reused at various places in ways you have no control over.
You should document the expected behavior of the public interface with tests.
- **Vuex actions**:
Any Vuex action must work in a consistent way, independent of the component it is triggered from.
- **Vuex mutations**:
For complex Vuex mutations, you should separate the tests from other parts of the Vuex store to simplify problem-solving.
#### When *not* to use unit tests
- **Non-exported functions or classes**:
Anything not exported from a module can be considered private or an implementation detail, and doesn't need to be tested.
- **Constants**:
Testing the value of a constant means copying it, resulting in extra effort without additional confidence that the value is correct.
- **Vue components**:
Computed properties, methods, and lifecycle hooks can be considered an implementation detail of components, are implicitly covered by component tests, and don't need to be tested.
For more information, see the [official Vue guidelines](https://vue-test-utils.vuejs.org/guides/#getting-started).
#### What to mock in unit tests
- **State of the class under test**:
Modifying the state of the class under test directly rather than using methods of the class avoids side effects in test setup.
- **Other exported classes**:
Every class must be tested in isolation to prevent test scenarios from growing exponentially.
- **Single DOM elements if passed as parameters**:
For tests only operating on single DOM elements, rather than a whole page, creating these elements is cheaper than loading an entire HTML fixture.
- **All server requests**:
When running frontend unit tests, the backend may not be reachable, so all outgoing requests need to be mocked.
- **Asynchronous background operations**:
Background operations cannot be stopped or waited on, so they will continue running in the following tests and cause side effects.
#### What *not* to mock in unit tests
- **Non-exported functions or classes**:
Everything that is not exported can be considered private to the module, and will be implicitly tested through the exported classes and functions.
- **Methods of the class under test**:
By mocking methods of the class under test, the mocks will be tested and not the real methods.
- **Utility functions (pure functions, or those that only modify parameters)**:
If a function has no side effects because it has no state, it is safe to not mock it in tests.
- **Full HTML pages**:
Avoid loading the HTML of a full page in unit tests, as it slows down tests.
### Frontend component tests
Component tests cover the state of a single component that is perceivable by a user depending on external signals such as user input, events fired from other components, or application state.
```mermaid
graph RL
plain[Plain JavaScript];
Vue[Vue Components];
feature-flags[Feature Flags];
license-checks[License Checks];
plain---Vuex;
plain---GraphQL;
Vue---plain;
Vue---Vuex;
Vue---GraphQL;
browser---plain;
browser---Vue;
plain---backend;
Vuex---backend;
GraphQL---backend;
Vue---backend;
backend---database;
backend---feature-flags;
backend---license-checks;
class Vue tested;
classDef node color:#909090,fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-width:2px,stroke:#909090
classDef label stroke-width:0;
classDef tested color:#000000,fill:#a0c0ff,stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
subgraph " "
tested;
mocked;
class tested tested;
end
```
#### When to use component tests
- **Vue components**
#### When *not* to use component tests
- **Vue applications**:
Vue applications may contain many components.
Testing them on a component level requires too much effort.
Therefore they are tested on frontend integration level.
- **HAML templates**:
HAML templates contain only Markup and no frontend-side logic.
Therefore they are not complete components.
#### What to mock in component tests
- **DOM**:
Operating on the real DOM is significantly slower than on the virtual DOM.
- **Properties and state of the component under test**:
Similar to testing classes, modifying the properties directly (rather than relying on methods of the component) avoids side effects.
- **Vuex store**:
To avoid side effects and keep component tests simple, Vuex stores are replaced with mocks.
- **All server requests**:
Similar to unit tests, when running component tests, the backend may not be reachable, so all outgoing requests need to be mocked.
- **Asynchronous background operations**:
Similar to unit tests, background operations cannot be stopped or waited on, so they will continue running in the following tests and cause side effects.
- **Child components**:
Every component is tested individually, so child components are mocked.
See also [`shallowMount()`](https://vue-test-utils.vuejs.org/api/#shallowmount)
#### What *not* to mock in component tests
- **Methods or computed properties of the component under test**:
By mocking part of the component under test, the mocks will be tested and not the real component.
- **Functions and classes independent from Vue**:
All plain JavaScript code is already covered by unit tests and needs not to be mocked in component tests.
## Integration tests
Formal definition: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_testing>
......@@ -66,14 +227,86 @@ They're useful to test permissions, redirections, what view is rendered etc.
| `app/controllers/` | `spec/controllers/` | RSpec | For N+1 tests, use [request specs](../query_recorder.md#use-request-specs-instead-of-controller-specs) |
| `app/mailers/` | `spec/mailers/` | RSpec | |
| `lib/api/` | `spec/requests/api/` | RSpec | |
| `app/assets/javascripts/` | `spec/javascripts/`, `spec/frontend/` | Karma & Jest | More details in the [Frontend Testing guide](frontend_testing.md) section. |
| `app/assets/javascripts/` | `spec/javascripts/`, `spec/frontend/` | Karma & Jest | [More details below](#frontend-integration-tests) |
### Frontend integration tests
Integration tests cover the interaction between all components on a single page.
Their abstraction level is comparable to how a user would interact with the UI.
```mermaid
graph RL
plain[Plain JavaScript];
Vue[Vue Components];
feature-flags[Feature Flags];
license-checks[License Checks];
plain---Vuex;
plain---GraphQL;
Vue---plain;
Vue---Vuex;
Vue---GraphQL;
browser---plain;
browser---Vue;
plain---backend;
Vuex---backend;
GraphQL---backend;
Vue---backend;
backend---database;
backend---feature-flags;
backend---license-checks;
class plain tested;
class Vue tested;
class Vuex tested;
class GraphQL tested;
class browser tested;
linkStyle 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
classDef node color:#909090,fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-width:2px,stroke:#909090
classDef label stroke-width:0;
classDef tested color:#000000,fill:#a0c0ff,stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
subgraph " "
tested;
mocked;
class tested tested;
end
```
#### When to use integration tests
- **Page bundles (`index.js` files in `app/assets/javascripts/pages/`)**:
Testing the page bundles ensures the corresponding frontend components integrate well.
- **Vue applications outside of page bundles**:
Testing Vue applications as a whole ensures the corresponding frontend components integrate well.
#### What to mock in integration tests
- **HAML views (use fixtures instead)**:
Rendering HAML views requires a Rails environment including a running database, which you cannot rely on in frontend tests.
- **All server requests**:
Similar to unit and component tests, when running component tests, the backend may not be reachable, so all outgoing requests must be mocked.
- **Asynchronous background operations that are not perceivable on the page**:
Background operations that affect the page must be tested on this level.
All other background operations cannot be stopped or waited on, so they will continue running in the following tests and cause side effects.
#### What *not* to mock in integration tests
- **DOM**:
Testing on the real DOM ensures your components work in the intended environment.
Part of DOM testing is delegated to [cross-browser testing](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/team-tasks/issues/45).
- **Properties or state of components**:
On this level, all tests can only perform actions a user would do.
For example: to change the state of a component, a click event would be fired.
- **Vuex stores**:
When testing the frontend code of a page as a whole, the interaction between Vue components and Vuex stores is covered as well.
### About controller tests
In an ideal world, controllers should be thin. However, when this is not the
case, it's acceptable to write a system/feature test without JavaScript instead
of a controller test. The reason is that testing a fat controller usually
involves a lot of stubbing, things like:
case, it's acceptable to write a system or feature test without JavaScript instead
of a controller test. Testing a fat controller usually involves a lot of stubbing, such as:
```ruby
controller.instance_variable_set(:@user, user)
......@@ -85,8 +318,7 @@ and use methods which are deprecated in Rails 5 ([#23768]).
### About Karma
As you may have noticed, Karma is both in the Unit tests and the Integration
tests category. That's because Karma is a tool that provides an environment to
Karma is both in the Unit tests and the Integration tests category. Karma provides an environment to
run JavaScript tests, so you can either run unit tests (e.g. test a single
JavaScript method), or integration tests (e.g. test a component that is composed
of multiple components).
......@@ -98,7 +330,7 @@ Formal definitions:
- <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_testing>
- <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White-box_testing>
These kind of tests ensure the GitLab *Rails* application (i.e.
These kind of tests ensure the GitLab *Rails* application (for example,
`gitlab-foss`/`gitlab`) works as expected from a *browser* point of view.
Note that:
......@@ -118,14 +350,94 @@ makes sense since it's a small component, which cannot be tested at the unit or
controller level.
Only test the happy path, but make sure to add a test case for any regression
that couldn't have been caught at lower levels with better tests (i.e. if a
regression is found, regression tests should be added at the lowest-level
that couldn't have been caught at lower levels with better tests (for example, if a
regression is found, regression tests should be added at the lowest level
possible).
| Tests path | Testing engine | Notes |
| ---------- | -------------- | ----- |
| `spec/features/` | [Capybara] + [RSpec] | If your test has the `:js` metadata, the browser driver will be [Poltergeist], otherwise it's using [RackTest]. |
### Frontend feature tests
In contrast to [frontend integration tests](#frontend-integration-tests), feature
tests make requests against the real backend instead of using fixtures.
This also implies that database queries are executed which makes this category significantly slower.
See also:
- The [RSpec testing guidelines](../testing_guide/best_practices.md#rspec).
- System / Feature tests in the [Testing Best Practices](best_practices.md#system--feature-tests).
- [Issue #26159](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/26159) which aims at combining those guidelines with this page.
```mermaid
graph RL
plain[Plain JavaScript];
Vue[Vue Components];
feature-flags[Feature Flags];
license-checks[License Checks];
plain---Vuex;
plain---GraphQL;
Vue---plain;
Vue---Vuex;
Vue---GraphQL;
browser---plain;
browser---Vue;
plain---backend;
Vuex---backend;
GraphQL---backend;
Vue---backend;
backend---database;
backend---feature-flags;
backend---license-checks;
class backend tested;
class plain tested;
class Vue tested;
class Vuex tested;
class GraphQL tested;
class browser tested;
linkStyle 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
classDef node color:#909090,fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-width:2px,stroke:#909090
classDef label stroke-width:0;
classDef tested color:#000000,fill:#a0c0ff,stroke:#6666ff,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5, 5;
subgraph " "
tested;
mocked;
class tested tested;
end
```
#### When to use feature tests
- Use cases that require a backend, and cannot be tested using fixtures.
- Behavior that is not part of a page bundle, but defined globally.
#### Relevant notes
A `:js` flag is added to the test to make sure the full environment is loaded:
```ruby
scenario 'successfully', :js do
sign_in(create(:admin))
end
```
The steps of each test are written using ([capybara methods](https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/capybara)).
XHR (XMLHttpRequest) calls might require you to use `wait_for_requests` in between steps, such as:
```ruby
find('.form-control').native.send_keys(:enter)
wait_for_requests
expect(page).not_to have_selector('.card')
```
### Consider **not** writing a system test
If we're confident that the low-level components work well (and we should be if
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment