Commit 02214dc5 authored by Krzysztof Wojcik's avatar Krzysztof Wojcik Committed by NeilBrown

FIX: md: process hangs at wait_barrier after 0->10 takeover

Following symptoms were observed:
1. After raid0->raid10 takeover operation we have array with 2
missing disks.
When we add disk for rebuild, recovery process starts as expected
but it does not finish- it stops at about 90%, md126_resync process
hangs in "D" state.
2. Similar behavior is when we have mounted raid0 array and we
execute takeover to raid10. After this when we try to unmount array-
it causes process umount hangs in "D"

In scenarios above processes hang at the same function- wait_barrier
in raid10.c.
Process waits in macro "wait_event_lock_irq" until the
"!conf->barrier" condition will be true.
In scenarios above it never happens.

Reason was that at the end of level_store, after calling pers->run,
we call mddev_resume. This calls pers->quiesce(mddev, 0) with
RAID10, that calls lower_barrier.
However raise_barrier hadn't been called on that 'conf' yet,
so conf->barrier becomes negative, which is bad.

This patch introduces setting conf->barrier=1 after takeover
operation. It prevents to become barrier negative after call
lower_barrier().
Signed-off-by: default avatarKrzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
parent e91ece55
...@@ -2463,10 +2463,12 @@ static void *raid10_takeover_raid0(mddev_t *mddev) ...@@ -2463,10 +2463,12 @@ static void *raid10_takeover_raid0(mddev_t *mddev)
mddev->recovery_cp = MaxSector; mddev->recovery_cp = MaxSector;
conf = setup_conf(mddev); conf = setup_conf(mddev);
if (!IS_ERR(conf)) if (!IS_ERR(conf)) {
list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set)
if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0) if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
rdev->new_raid_disk = rdev->raid_disk * 2; rdev->new_raid_disk = rdev->raid_disk * 2;
conf->barrier = 1;
}
return conf; return conf;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment