Commit 1f3a090b authored by Tonghao Zhang's avatar Tonghao Zhang Committed by David S. Miller

net: openvswitch: introduce common code for flushing flows

To avoid some issues, for example RCU usage warning and double free,
we should flush the flows under ovs_lock. This patch refactors
table_instance_destroy and introduces table_instance_flow_flush
which can be invoked by __dp_destroy or ovs_flow_tbl_flush.

Fixes: 50b0e61b ("net: openvswitch: fix possible memleak on destroy flow-table")
Reported-by: default avatarJohan Knöös <jknoos@google.com>
Reported-at: https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2020-August/050489.htmlSigned-off-by: default avatarTonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 88fd1cb8
......@@ -1756,6 +1756,7 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
/* Called with ovs_mutex. */
static void __dp_destroy(struct datapath *dp)
{
struct flow_table *table = &dp->table;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < DP_VPORT_HASH_BUCKETS; i++) {
......@@ -1774,7 +1775,14 @@ static void __dp_destroy(struct datapath *dp)
*/
ovs_dp_detach_port(ovs_vport_ovsl(dp, OVSP_LOCAL));
/* RCU destroy the flow table */
/* Flush sw_flow in the tables. RCU cb only releases resource
* such as dp, ports and tables. That may avoid some issues
* such as RCU usage warning.
*/
table_instance_flow_flush(table, ovsl_dereference(table->ti),
ovsl_dereference(table->ufid_ti));
/* RCU destroy the ports, meters and flow tables. */
call_rcu(&dp->rcu, destroy_dp_rcu);
}
......
......@@ -473,19 +473,15 @@ static void table_instance_flow_free(struct flow_table *table,
flow_mask_remove(table, flow->mask);
}
static void table_instance_destroy(struct flow_table *table,
/* Must be called with OVS mutex held. */
void table_instance_flow_flush(struct flow_table *table,
struct table_instance *ti,
struct table_instance *ufid_ti,
bool deferred)
struct table_instance *ufid_ti)
{
int i;
if (!ti)
return;
BUG_ON(!ufid_ti);
if (ti->keep_flows)
goto skip_flows;
return;
for (i = 0; i < ti->n_buckets; i++) {
struct sw_flow *flow;
......@@ -497,18 +493,16 @@ static void table_instance_destroy(struct flow_table *table,
table_instance_flow_free(table, ti, ufid_ti,
flow, false);
ovs_flow_free(flow, deferred);
ovs_flow_free(flow, true);
}
}
}
skip_flows:
if (deferred) {
static void table_instance_destroy(struct table_instance *ti,
struct table_instance *ufid_ti)
{
call_rcu(&ti->rcu, flow_tbl_destroy_rcu_cb);
call_rcu(&ufid_ti->rcu, flow_tbl_destroy_rcu_cb);
} else {
__table_instance_destroy(ti);
__table_instance_destroy(ufid_ti);
}
}
/* No need for locking this function is called from RCU callback or
......@@ -523,7 +517,7 @@ void ovs_flow_tbl_destroy(struct flow_table *table)
call_rcu(&mc->rcu, mask_cache_rcu_cb);
call_rcu(&ma->rcu, mask_array_rcu_cb);
table_instance_destroy(table, ti, ufid_ti, false);
table_instance_destroy(ti, ufid_ti);
}
struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_tbl_dump_next(struct table_instance *ti,
......@@ -641,7 +635,8 @@ int ovs_flow_tbl_flush(struct flow_table *flow_table)
flow_table->count = 0;
flow_table->ufid_count = 0;
table_instance_destroy(flow_table, old_ti, old_ufid_ti, true);
table_instance_flow_flush(flow_table, old_ti, old_ufid_ti);
table_instance_destroy(old_ti, old_ufid_ti);
return 0;
err_free_ti:
......
......@@ -105,5 +105,8 @@ void ovs_flow_mask_key(struct sw_flow_key *dst, const struct sw_flow_key *src,
bool full, const struct sw_flow_mask *mask);
void ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(struct flow_table *table);
void table_instance_flow_flush(struct flow_table *table,
struct table_instance *ti,
struct table_instance *ufid_ti);
#endif /* flow_table.h */
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment