tcp: fix loop in ofo handling code and reduce its complexity

Somewhat luckily, I was looking into these parts with very fine
comb because I've made somewhat similar changes on the same
area (conflicts that arose weren't that lucky though). The loop
was very much overengineered recently in commit 91521944
(tcp: Use SKB queue and list helpers instead of doing it
by-hand), while it basically just wants to know if there are
skbs after 'skb'.

Also it got broken because skb1 = skb->next got translated into
skb1 = skb1->next (though abstracted) improperly. Note that
'skb1' is pointing to previous sk_buff than skb or NULL if at
head. Two things went wrong:
- We'll kfree 'skb' on the first iteration instead of the
  skbuff following 'skb' (it would require required SACK reneging
  to recover I think).
- The list head case where 'skb1' is NULL is checked too early
  and the loop won't execute whereas it previously did.

Conclusion, mostly revert the recent changes which makes the
cset very messy looking but using proper accessor in the
previous-like version.

The effective changes against the original can be viewed with:
  git-diff 91521944^ \
		net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | sed -n -e '57,70 p'
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net/ipv4/tcp_input.c

@@ -4481,18 +4481,13 @@ static void tcp_data_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 			__skb_queue_after(&tp->out_of_order_queue, skb1, skb);
 
 		/* And clean segments covered by new one as whole. */
-		if (skb1 && !skb_queue_is_last(&tp->out_of_order_queue, skb1)) {
-			struct sk_buff *n;
+		while (!skb_queue_is_last(&tp->out_of_order_queue, skb)) {
+			skb1 = skb_queue_next(&tp->out_of_order_queue, skb);
 
-			skb1 = skb_queue_next(&tp->out_of_order_queue, skb1);
-			skb_queue_walk_from_safe(&tp->out_of_order_queue,
-						 skb1, n) {
 			if (!after(end_seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb1)->seq))
 				break;
-				if (before(end_seq,
-					   TCP_SKB_CB(skb1)->end_seq)) {
-					tcp_dsack_extend(sk,
-							 TCP_SKB_CB(skb1)->seq,
+			if (before(end_seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb1)->end_seq)) {
+				tcp_dsack_extend(sk, TCP_SKB_CB(skb1)->seq,
 						 end_seq);
 				break;
 			}
@@ -4501,7 +4496,6 @@ static void tcp_data_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 					 TCP_SKB_CB(skb1)->end_seq);
 			__kfree_skb(skb1);
 		}
-		}
 
 add_sack:
 		if (tcp_is_sack(tp))