Commit 34a2cc6e authored by Jakub Sitnicki's avatar Jakub Sitnicki Committed by Daniel Borkmann

selftests/bpf: Test that lookup on SOCKMAP/SOCKHASH is allowed

Now that bpf_map_lookup_elem() is white-listed for SOCKMAP/SOCKHASH,
replace the tests which check that verifier prevents lookup on these map
types with ones that ensure that lookup operation is permitted, but only
with a release of acquired socket reference.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200429181154.479310-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
parent 64d85290
{
"prevent map lookup in sockmap",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_sockmap = { 3 },
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "cannot pass map_type 15 into func bpf_map_lookup_elem",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS,
},
{
"prevent map lookup in sockhash",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_sockhash = { 3 },
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "cannot pass map_type 18 into func bpf_map_lookup_elem",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS,
},
{ {
"prevent map lookup in stack trace", "prevent map lookup in stack trace",
.insns = { .insns = {
......
...@@ -516,3 +516,73 @@ ...@@ -516,3 +516,73 @@
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
.result = ACCEPT, .result = ACCEPT,
}, },
{
"bpf_map_lookup_elem(sockmap, &key)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_sockmap = { 3 },
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "Unreleased reference id=2 alloc_insn=5",
},
{
"bpf_map_lookup_elem(sockhash, &key)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_sockhash = { 3 },
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "Unreleased reference id=2 alloc_insn=5",
},
{
"bpf_map_lookup_elem(sockmap, &key); sk->type [fullsock field]; bpf_sk_release(sk)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_sockmap = { 3 },
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"bpf_map_lookup_elem(sockhash, &key); sk->type [fullsock field]; bpf_sk_release(sk)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_sockhash = { 3 },
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment