Commit 434c32f7 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

include/linux/sched.h: don't use task->pid/tgid in same_thread_group/has_group_leader_pid

commit e1403b8e upstream.

task_struct->pid/tgid should go away.

1. Change same_thread_group() to use task->signal for comparison.

2. Change has_group_leader_pid(task) to compare task_pid(task) with
   signal->leader_pid.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatar"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 7c6300bb
...@@ -2203,15 +2203,15 @@ static inline bool thread_group_leader(struct task_struct *p) ...@@ -2203,15 +2203,15 @@ static inline bool thread_group_leader(struct task_struct *p)
* all we care about is that we have a task with the appropriate * all we care about is that we have a task with the appropriate
* pid, we don't actually care if we have the right task. * pid, we don't actually care if we have the right task.
*/ */
static inline int has_group_leader_pid(struct task_struct *p) static inline bool has_group_leader_pid(struct task_struct *p)
{ {
return p->pid == p->tgid; return task_pid(p) == p->signal->leader_pid;
} }
static inline static inline
int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2) bool same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
{ {
return p1->tgid == p2->tgid; return p1->signal == p2->signal;
} }
static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p) static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment