perf annotate: Enable annotation of BPF programs
In symbol__disassemble(), DSO_BINARY_TYPE__BPF_PROG_INFO dso calls into
a new function symbol__disassemble_bpf(), where annotation line
information is filled based on the bpf_prog_info and btf data saved in
given perf_env.
symbol__disassemble_bpf() uses binutils's libopcodes to disassemble bpf
programs.
Committer testing:
After fixing this:
- u64 *addrs = (u64 *)(info_linear->info.jited_ksyms);
+ u64 *addrs = (u64 *)(uintptr_t)(info_linear->info.jited_ksyms);
Detected when crossbuilding to a 32-bit arch.
And making all this dependent on HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT and
HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT:
1) Have a BPF program running, one that has BTF info, etc, I used
the tools/perf/examples/bpf/augmented_raw_syscalls.c put in place
by 'perf trace'.
# grep -B1 augmented_raw ~/.perfconfig
[trace]
add_events = /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/augmented_raw_syscalls.c
#
# perf trace -e *mmsg
dnf/6245 sendmmsg(20, 0x7f5485a88030, 2, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 2
NetworkManager/10055 sendmmsg(22<socket:[1056822]>, 0x7f8126ad1bb0, 2, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 2
2) Then do a 'perf record' system wide for a while:
# perf record -a
^C[ perf record: Woken up 68 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 19.427 MB perf.data (366891 samples) ]
#
3) Check that we captured BPF and BTF info in the perf.data file:
# perf report --header-only | grep 'b[pt]f'
# event : name = cycles:ppp, , id = { 294789, 294790, 294791, 294792, 294793, 294794, 294795, 294796 }, size = 112, { sample_period, sample_freq } = 4000, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD, read_format = ID, disabled = 1, inherit = 1, mmap = 1, comm = 1, freq = 1, task = 1, precise_ip = 3, sample_id_all = 1, exclude_guest = 1, mmap2 = 1, comm_exec = 1, ksymbol = 1, bpf_event = 1
# bpf_prog_info of id 13
# bpf_prog_info of id 14
# bpf_prog_info of id 15
# bpf_prog_info of id 16
# bpf_prog_info of id 17
# bpf_prog_info of id 18
# bpf_prog_info of id 21
# bpf_prog_info of id 22
# bpf_prog_info of id 41
# bpf_prog_info of id 42
# btf info of id 2
#
4) Check which programs got recorded:
# perf report | grep bpf_prog | head
0.16% exe bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter [k] bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
0.14% exe bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit [k] bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit
0.08% fuse-overlayfs bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter [k] bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
0.07% fuse-overlayfs bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit [k] bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit
0.01% clang-4.0 bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit [k] bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit
0.01% clang-4.0 bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter [k] bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
0.00% clang bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit [k] bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit
0.00% runc bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter [k] bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
0.00% clang bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter [k] bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
0.00% sh bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit [k] bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit
#
This was with the default --sort order for 'perf report', which is:
--sort comm,dso,symbol
If we just look for the symbol, for instance:
# perf report --sort symbol | grep bpf_prog | head
0.26% [k] bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter - -
0.24% [k] bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit - -
#
or the DSO:
# perf report --sort dso | grep bpf_prog | head
0.26% bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
0.24% bpf_prog_c1bd85c092d6e4aa_sys_exit
#
We'll see the two BPF programs that augmented_raw_syscalls.o puts in
place, one attached to the raw_syscalls:sys_enter and another to the
raw_syscalls:sys_exit tracepoints, as expected.
Now we can finally do, from the command line, annotation for one of
those two symbols, with the original BPF program source coude intermixed
with the disassembled JITed code:
# perf annotate --stdio2 bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
Samples: 950 of event 'cycles:ppp', 4000 Hz, Event count (approx.): 553756947, [percent: local period]
bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter() bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
Percent int sys_enter(struct syscall_enter_args *args)
53.41 push %rbp
0.63 mov %rsp,%rbp
0.31 sub $0x170,%rsp
1.93 sub $0x28,%rbp
7.02 mov %rbx,0x0(%rbp)
3.20 mov %r13,0x8(%rbp)
1.07 mov %r14,0x10(%rbp)
0.61 mov %r15,0x18(%rbp)
0.11 xor %eax,%eax
1.29 mov %rax,0x20(%rbp)
0.11 mov %rdi,%rbx
return bpf_get_current_pid_tgid();
2.02 → callq *ffffffffda6776d9
2.76 mov %eax,-0x148(%rbp)
mov %rbp,%rsi
int sys_enter(struct syscall_enter_args *args)
add $0xfffffffffffffeb8,%rsi
return bpf_map_lookup_elem(pids, &pid) != NULL;
movabs $0xffff975ac2607800,%rdi
1.26 → callq *ffffffffda6789e9
cmp $0x0,%rax
2.43 → je 0
add $0x38,%rax
0.21 xor %r13d,%r13d
if (pid_filter__has(&pids_filtered, getpid()))
0.81 cmp $0x0,%rax
→ jne 0
mov %rbp,%rdi
probe_read(&augmented_args.args, sizeof(augmented_args.args), args);
2.22 add $0xfffffffffffffeb8,%rdi
0.11 mov $0x40,%esi
0.32 mov %rbx,%rdx
2.74 → callq *ffffffffda658409
syscall = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&syscalls, &augmented_args.args.syscall_nr);
0.22 mov %rbp,%rsi
1.69 add $0xfffffffffffffec0,%rsi
syscall = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&syscalls, &augmented_args.args.syscall_nr);
movabs $0xffff975bfcd36000,%rdi
add $0xd0,%rdi
0.21 mov 0x0(%rsi),%eax
0.93 cmp $0x200,%rax
→ jae 0
0.10 shl $0x3,%rax
0.11 add %rdi,%rax
0.11 → jmp 0
xor %eax,%eax
if (syscall == NULL || !syscall->enabled)
1.07 cmp $0x0,%rax
→ je 0
if (syscall == NULL || !syscall->enabled)
6.57 movzbq 0x0(%rax),%rdi
if (syscall == NULL || !syscall->enabled)
cmp $0x0,%rdi
0.95 → je 0
mov $0x40,%r8d
switch (augmented_args.args.syscall_nr) {
mov -0x140(%rbp),%rdi
switch (augmented_args.args.syscall_nr) {
cmp $0x2,%rdi
→ je 0
cmp $0x101,%rdi
→ je 0
cmp $0x15,%rdi
→ jne 0
case SYS_OPEN: filename_arg = (const void *)args->args[0];
mov 0x10(%rbx),%rdx
→ jmp 0
case SYS_OPENAT: filename_arg = (const void *)args->args[1];
mov 0x18(%rbx),%rdx
if (filename_arg != NULL) {
cmp $0x0,%rdx
→ je 0
xor %edi,%edi
augmented_args.filename.reserved = 0;
mov %edi,-0x104(%rbp)
augmented_args.filename.size = probe_read_str(&augmented_args.filename.value,
mov %rbp,%rdi
add $0xffffffffffffff00,%rdi
augmented_args.filename.size = probe_read_str(&augmented_args.filename.value,
mov $0x100,%esi
→ callq *ffffffffda658499
mov $0x148,%r8d
augmented_args.filename.size = probe_read_str(&augmented_args.filename.value,
mov %eax,-0x108(%rbp)
augmented_args.filename.size = probe_read_str(&augmented_args.filename.value,
mov %rax,%rdi
shl $0x20,%rdi
shr $0x20,%rdi
if (augmented_args.filename.size < sizeof(augmented_args.filename.value)) {
cmp $0xff,%rdi
→ ja 0
len -= sizeof(augmented_args.filename.value) - augmented_args.filename.size;
add $0x48,%rax
len &= sizeof(augmented_args.filename.value) - 1;
and $0xff,%rax
mov %rax,%r8
mov %rbp,%rcx
return perf_event_output(args, &__augmented_syscalls__, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU, &augmented_args, len);
add $0xfffffffffffffeb8,%rcx
mov %rbx,%rdi
movabs $0xffff975fbd72d800,%rsi
mov $0xffffffff,%edx
→ callq *ffffffffda658ad9
mov %rax,%r13
}
mov %r13,%rax
0.72 mov 0x0(%rbp),%rbx
mov 0x8(%rbp),%r13
1.16 mov 0x10(%rbp),%r14
0.10 mov 0x18(%rbp),%r15
0.42 add $0x28,%rbp
0.54 leaveq
0.54 ← retq
#
Please see 'man perf-config' to see how to control what should be seen,
via ~/.perfconfig [annotate] section, for instance, one can suppress the
source code and see just the disassembly, etc.
Alternatively, use the TUI bu just using 'perf annotate', press
'/bpf_prog' to see the bpf symbols, press enter and do the interactive
annotation, which allows for dumping to a file after selecting the
the various output tunables, for instance, the above without source code
intermixed, plus showing all the instruction offsets:
# perf annotate bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
Then press: 's' to hide the source code + 'O' twice to show all
instruction offsets, then 'P' to print to the
bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter.annotation file, which will have:
# cat bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter.annotation
bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter() bpf_prog_819967866022f1e1_sys_enter
Event: cycles:ppp
53.41 0: push %rbp
0.63 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
0.31 4: sub $0x170,%rsp
1.93 b: sub $0x28,%rbp
7.02 f: mov %rbx,0x0(%rbp)
3.20 13: mov %r13,0x8(%rbp)
1.07 17: mov %r14,0x10(%rbp)
0.61 1b: mov %r15,0x18(%rbp)
0.11 1f: xor %eax,%eax
1.29 21: mov %rax,0x20(%rbp)
0.11 25: mov %rdi,%rbx
2.02 28: → callq *ffffffffda6776d9
2.76 2d: mov %eax,-0x148(%rbp)
33: mov %rbp,%rsi
36: add $0xfffffffffffffeb8,%rsi
3d: movabs $0xffff975ac2607800,%rdi
1.26 47: → callq *ffffffffda6789e9
4c: cmp $0x0,%rax
2.43 50: → je 0
52: add $0x38,%rax
0.21 56: xor %r13d,%r13d
0.81 59: cmp $0x0,%rax
5d: → jne 0
63: mov %rbp,%rdi
2.22 66: add $0xfffffffffffffeb8,%rdi
0.11 6d: mov $0x40,%esi
0.32 72: mov %rbx,%rdx
2.74 75: → callq *ffffffffda658409
0.22 7a: mov %rbp,%rsi
1.69 7d: add $0xfffffffffffffec0,%rsi
84: movabs $0xffff975bfcd36000,%rdi
8e: add $0xd0,%rdi
0.21 95: mov 0x0(%rsi),%eax
0.93 98: cmp $0x200,%rax
9f: → jae 0
0.10 a1: shl $0x3,%rax
0.11 a5: add %rdi,%rax
0.11 a8: → jmp 0
aa: xor %eax,%eax
1.07 ac: cmp $0x0,%rax
b0: → je 0
6.57 b6: movzbq 0x0(%rax),%rdi
bb: cmp $0x0,%rdi
0.95 bf: → je 0
c5: mov $0x40,%r8d
cb: mov -0x140(%rbp),%rdi
d2: cmp $0x2,%rdi
d6: → je 0
d8: cmp $0x101,%rdi
df: → je 0
e1: cmp $0x15,%rdi
e5: → jne 0
e7: mov 0x10(%rbx),%rdx
eb: → jmp 0
ed: mov 0x18(%rbx),%rdx
f1: cmp $0x0,%rdx
f5: → je 0
f7: xor %edi,%edi
f9: mov %edi,-0x104(%rbp)
ff: mov %rbp,%rdi
102: add $0xffffffffffffff00,%rdi
109: mov $0x100,%esi
10e: → callq *ffffffffda658499
113: mov $0x148,%r8d
119: mov %eax,-0x108(%rbp)
11f: mov %rax,%rdi
122: shl $0x20,%rdi
126: shr $0x20,%rdi
12a: cmp $0xff,%rdi
131: → ja 0
133: add $0x48,%rax
137: and $0xff,%rax
13d: mov %rax,%r8
140: mov %rbp,%rcx
143: add $0xfffffffffffffeb8,%rcx
14a: mov %rbx,%rdi
14d: movabs $0xffff975fbd72d800,%rsi
157: mov $0xffffffff,%edx
15c: → callq *ffffffffda658ad9
161: mov %rax,%r13
164: mov %r13,%rax
0.72 167: mov 0x0(%rbp),%rbx
16b: mov 0x8(%rbp),%r13
1.16 16f: mov 0x10(%rbp),%r14
0.10 173: mov 0x18(%rbp),%r15
0.42 177: add $0x28,%rbp
0.54 17b: leaveq
0.54 17c: ← retq
Another cool way to test all this is to symple use 'perf top' look for
those symbols, go there and press enter, annotate it live :-)
Signed-off-by: 
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: 
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: 
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190312053051.2690567-13-songliubraving@fb.comSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment