Commit 6d76fa58 authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds

Don't allow chmod() on the /proc/<pid>/ files

This just turns off chmod() on the /proc/<pid>/ files, since there is no
good reason to allow it, and had we disallowed it originally, the nasty
/proc race exploit wouldn't have been possible.

The other patches already fixed the problem chmod() could cause, so this
is really just some final mop-up..

This particular version is based off a patch by Eugene and Marcel which
had much better naming than my original equivalent one.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEugene Teo <eteo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 92d03285
......@@ -551,6 +551,27 @@ static int proc_fd_access_allowed(struct inode *inode)
return allowed;
}
static int proc_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
{
int error;
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MODE)
return -EPERM;
error = inode_change_ok(inode, attr);
if (!error) {
error = security_inode_setattr(dentry, attr);
if (!error)
error = inode_setattr(inode, attr);
}
return error;
}
static struct inode_operations proc_def_inode_operations = {
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
extern struct seq_operations mounts_op;
struct proc_mounts {
struct seq_file m;
......@@ -1111,7 +1132,8 @@ static int proc_pid_readlink(struct dentry * dentry, char __user * buffer, int b
static struct inode_operations proc_pid_link_inode_operations = {
.readlink = proc_pid_readlink,
.follow_link = proc_pid_follow_link
.follow_link = proc_pid_follow_link,
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
static int proc_readfd(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldir)
......@@ -1285,6 +1307,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_pid_make_inode(struct super_block * sb, struct task_st
ei = PROC_I(inode);
inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
inode->i_ino = fake_ino(task->pid, ino);
inode->i_op = &proc_def_inode_operations;
/*
* grab the reference to task.
......@@ -1529,11 +1552,13 @@ static struct file_operations proc_task_operations = {
*/
static struct inode_operations proc_fd_inode_operations = {
.lookup = proc_lookupfd,
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
static struct inode_operations proc_task_inode_operations = {
.lookup = proc_task_lookup,
.getattr = proc_task_getattr,
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
......@@ -1847,11 +1872,13 @@ static struct file_operations proc_tid_base_operations = {
static struct inode_operations proc_tgid_base_inode_operations = {
.lookup = proc_tgid_base_lookup,
.getattr = pid_getattr,
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
static struct inode_operations proc_tid_base_inode_operations = {
.lookup = proc_tid_base_lookup,
.getattr = pid_getattr,
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
......@@ -1894,11 +1921,13 @@ static struct dentry *proc_tid_attr_lookup(struct inode *dir,
static struct inode_operations proc_tgid_attr_inode_operations = {
.lookup = proc_tgid_attr_lookup,
.getattr = pid_getattr,
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
static struct inode_operations proc_tid_attr_inode_operations = {
.lookup = proc_tid_attr_lookup,
.getattr = pid_getattr,
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
#endif
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment