objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage
A clang build reported an (obvious) double CLAC while a GCC build did not; it turns out that objtool only re-visits instructions if the first visit was with AC=0. If OTOH the first visit was with AC=1, it completely ignores any subsequent visit, even when it has AC=0. Fix this by using a visited mask instead of a boolean, and (explicitly) mark the AC state. $ ./objtool check -b --no-fp --retpoline --uaccess drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x22: redundant UACCESS disable drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: eb_copy_relocations.isra.34()+0xea: (alt) drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0xffffffffffffffff: (branch) drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: eb_copy_relocations.isra.34()+0xd9: (alt) drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: eb_copy_relocations.isra.34()+0xb2: (branch) drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: eb_copy_relocations.isra.34()+0x39: (branch) drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: eb_copy_relocations.isra.34()+0x0: <=== (func) Reported-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5359166aad2d53f3145cd442d83d0e5115e0cd17.1564007838.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment