Commit 8bc3b1e6 authored by David Moore's avatar David Moore Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: BUG_ON assertion repeated for inode1, not done for inode2

During a source code review of fs/ext4/extents.c I noted identical
consecutive lines. An assertion is repeated for inode1 and never done
for inode2. This is not in keeping with the rest of the code in the
ext4_swap_extents function and appears to be a bug.

Assert that the inode2 mutex is not locked.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Moore <dmoorefo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: default avatarEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
parent ad0a0ce8
......@@ -5542,7 +5542,7 @@ ext4_swap_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode1,
BUG_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&EXT4_I(inode1)->i_data_sem));
BUG_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&EXT4_I(inode2)->i_data_sem));
BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&inode1->i_mutex));
BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&inode1->i_mutex));
BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&inode2->i_mutex));
*erp = ext4_es_remove_extent(inode1, lblk1, count);
if (unlikely(*erp))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment