Commit 987f6c69 authored by Maor Gottlieb's avatar Maor Gottlieb Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5: Add missing RDMA_RX capabilities

New flow table type RDMA_RX was added but the MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE
didn't handle this new flow table type.
This means that MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE returns an empty capability to
this flow table type.

Update both the macro and the maximum supported flow table type to
RDMA_RX.

Fixes: d83eb50e ("net/mlx5: Add support in RDMA RX steering")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
parent 08aa5e7d
...@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum fs_flow_table_type { ...@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum fs_flow_table_type {
FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX = 0X5, FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX = 0X5,
FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX = 0X6, FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX = 0X6,
FS_FT_RDMA_RX = 0X7, FS_FT_RDMA_RX = 0X7,
FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX, FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_RDMA_RX,
}; };
enum fs_flow_table_op_mod { enum fs_flow_table_op_mod {
...@@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_fs(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev); ...@@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_fs(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
(type == FS_FT_FDB) ? MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(mdev, cap) : \ (type == FS_FT_FDB) ? MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(mdev, cap) : \
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_RX(mdev, cap) : \ (type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_RX(mdev, cap) : \
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_TX(mdev, cap) : \ (type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_TX(mdev, cap) : \
(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\ (type == FS_FT_RDMA_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_RDMA_RX(mdev, cap) : \
(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_RDMA_RX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
) )
#endif #endif
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment