Commit 9ffa68f6 authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva Committed by Jonathan Cameron

iio: health: max30102: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through"
annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458342 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458345 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
parent a18c66c4
...@@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static int max30102_read_measurement(struct max30102_data *data, ...@@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static int max30102_read_measurement(struct max30102_data *data,
switch (measurements) { switch (measurements) {
case 3: case 3:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(2); MAX30102_COPY_DATA(2);
case 2: /* fall-through */ /* fall through */
case 2:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(1); MAX30102_COPY_DATA(1);
case 1: /* fall-through */ /* fall through */
case 1:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(0); MAX30102_COPY_DATA(0);
break; break;
default: default:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment