net/mlx5: Use offset based reserved field names in the IFC header file
mlx5_ifc.h is a header file representing the API and ABI between the driver to the firmware and hardware. This file is used from both the mlx5_ib and mlx5_core drivers. Previously, this file used incrementing counter to indicate reserved fields, for example: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_0[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_1[0x1a]; }; If one developer implements through net-next feature A that uses reserved_0, they replace it with featureA and renames reserved_1 to reserved_0. In the same kernel cycle, a 2nd developer could implement feature B through the rdma tree, that uses reserved_1 and split it to featureB and a smaller reserved_1 field. This will cause a conflict when the two trees are merged. The source of this conflict is that the 1st developer changed *all* reserved fields. As Linus suggested, we change the layout of structs to: struct mlx5_ifc_odp_per_transport_service_cap_bits { u8 send[0x1]; u8 receive[0x1]; u8 write[0x1]; u8 read[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_4[0x1]; u8 srq_receive[0x1]; u8 reserved_at_6[0x1a]; }; This makes the conflicts much more rare and preserves the locality of changes. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment