IB/uverbs: Fix race between uverbs_close and remove_one

commit d1e09f30 upstream.

Fixes an oops that might happen if uverbs_close races with
remove_one.

Both contexts may run ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext, it depends
on the flow.

Currently, there is no protection for a case that remove_one
didn't make the cleanup it runs to its end, the underlying
ib_device was freed then uverbs_close will call
ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext and OOPs.

Above might happen if uverbs_close deleted the file from the list
then remove_one didn't find it and runs to its end.

Fixes to protect against that case by a new cleanup lock so that
ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext will be called always before that
remove_one is ended.

Fixes: 35d4a0b6 ("IB/uverbs: Fix race between ib_uverbs_open and remove_one")
Reported-by: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h

@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct ib_uverbs_event_file {
 struct ib_uverbs_file {
 	struct kref				ref;
 	struct mutex				mutex;
+	struct mutex                            cleanup_mutex; /* protect cleanup */
 	struct ib_uverbs_device		       *device;
 	struct ib_ucontext		       *ucontext;
 	struct ib_event_handler			event_handler;

drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c

@@ -931,6 +931,7 @@ static int ib_uverbs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 	file->async_file = NULL;
 	kref_init(&file->ref);
 	mutex_init(&file->mutex);
+	mutex_init(&file->cleanup_mutex);
 
 	filp->private_data = file;
 	kobject_get(&dev->kobj);
@@ -956,18 +957,20 @@ static int ib_uverbs_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	struct ib_uverbs_file *file = filp->private_data;
 	struct ib_uverbs_device *dev = file->device;
-	struct ib_ucontext *ucontext = NULL;
 
-	mutex_lock(&file->device->lists_mutex);
-	ucontext = file->ucontext;
+	mutex_lock(&file->cleanup_mutex);
+	if (file->ucontext) {
+		ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext(file, file->ucontext);
 		file->ucontext = NULL;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&file->cleanup_mutex);
+
+	mutex_lock(&file->device->lists_mutex);
 	if (!file->is_closed) {
 		list_del(&file->list);
 		file->is_closed = 1;
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&file->device->lists_mutex);
-	if (ucontext)
-		ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext(file, ucontext);
 
 	if (file->async_file)
 		kref_put(&file->async_file->ref, ib_uverbs_release_event_file);
@@ -1181,22 +1184,30 @@ static void ib_uverbs_free_hw_resources(struct ib_uverbs_device *uverbs_dev,
 	mutex_lock(&uverbs_dev->lists_mutex);
 	while (!list_empty(&uverbs_dev->uverbs_file_list)) {
 		struct ib_ucontext *ucontext;
-
 		file = list_first_entry(&uverbs_dev->uverbs_file_list,
 					struct ib_uverbs_file, list);
 		file->is_closed = 1;
-		ucontext = file->ucontext;
 		list_del(&file->list);
-		file->ucontext = NULL;
 		kref_get(&file->ref);
 		mutex_unlock(&uverbs_dev->lists_mutex);
-		/* We must release the mutex before going ahead and calling
-		 * disassociate_ucontext. disassociate_ucontext might end up
-		 * indirectly calling uverbs_close, for example due to freeing
-		 * the resources (e.g mmput).
-		 */
+
 		ib_uverbs_event_handler(&file->event_handler, &event);
+
+		mutex_lock(&file->cleanup_mutex);
+		ucontext = file->ucontext;
+		file->ucontext = NULL;
+		mutex_unlock(&file->cleanup_mutex);
+
+		/* At this point ib_uverbs_close cannot be running
+		 * ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext
+		 */
 		if (ucontext) {
+			/* We must release the mutex before going ahead and
+			 * calling disassociate_ucontext. disassociate_ucontext
+			 * might end up indirectly calling uverbs_close,
+			 * for example due to freeing the resources
+			 * (e.g mmput).
+			 */
 			ib_dev->disassociate_ucontext(ucontext);
 			ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext(file, ucontext);
 		}