Commit d9b99ffc authored by Michel Thierry's avatar Michel Thierry Committed by Rodrigo Vivi

drm/i915/cnl: Remove unnecessary check in cnl_setup_private_ppat

There is no need check if PPGTT is disabled because that not possible
in CNL. Execlists and GuC submission modes rely on at least aliasing
PPGTT and even intel_sanitize_enable_ppgtt says: "We don't allow disabling
PPGTT for gen9+ as it's a requirement for execlists, the sole mechanism
available to submit work."
Suggested-by: default avatarDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171027223207.7869-1-michel.thierry@intel.com
parent 9f846643
...@@ -3178,12 +3178,6 @@ static void cnl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_ppat *ppat) ...@@ -3178,12 +3178,6 @@ static void cnl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_ppat *ppat)
ppat->match = bdw_private_pat_match; ppat->match = bdw_private_pat_match;
ppat->clear_value = GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3); ppat->clear_value = GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3);
/* XXX: spec is unclear if this is still needed for CNL+ */
if (!USES_PPGTT(ppat->i915)) {
__alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, 0, GEN8_PPAT_UC);
return;
}
__alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, 0, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLC); __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, 0, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLC);
__alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, 1, GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC); __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, 1, GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
__alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, 2, GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC); __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, 2, GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment