staging: lustre: cleanup comment style for lnet selftest

Apply a consistent style for comments in the lnet selftest
code. Realign some of the comments to make it easier to read.
This also fixes a few checkpatch issues as well.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conrpc.c

@@ -562,10 +562,10 @@ lstcon_rpc_trans_destroy(lstcon_rpc_trans_t *trans)
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * rpcs can be still not callbacked (even LNetMDUnlink is called)
-		 * because huge timeout for inaccessible network, don't make
-		 * user wait for them, just abandon them, they will be recycled
-		 * in callback
+		 * rpcs can be still not callbacked (even LNetMDUnlink is
+		 * called) because huge timeout for inaccessible network,
+		 * don't make user wait for them, just abandon them, they
+		 * will be recycled in callback
 		 */
 		LASSERT(crpc->crp_status);
 
@@ -1178,7 +1178,8 @@ lstcon_rpc_pinger(void *arg)
 	int count = 0;
 	int rc;
 
-	/* RPC pinger is a special case of transaction,
+	/*
+	 * RPC pinger is a special case of transaction,
 	 * it's called by timer at 8 seconds interval.
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&console_session.ses_mutex);

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/console.c

@@ -1446,7 +1446,8 @@ lstcon_test_batch_query(char *name, int testidx, int client,
 
 	lstcon_rpc_trans_postwait(trans, timeout);
 
-	if (!testidx && /* query a batch, not a test */
+	/* query a batch, not a test */
+	if (!testidx &&
 	    !lstcon_rpc_stat_failure(lstcon_trans_stat(), 0) &&
 	    !lstcon_tsbqry_stat_run(lstcon_trans_stat(), 0)) {
 		/* all RPCs finished, and no active test */

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/framework.c

@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ sfw_test_unit_done(sfw_test_unit_t *tsu)
 
 	spin_lock(&sfw_data.fw_lock);
 
-	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&tsb->bat_nactive) ||/* tsb still active */
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&tsb->bat_nactive) ||	/* tsb still active */
 	    sn == sfw_data.fw_session) {		/* sn also active */
 		spin_unlock(&sfw_data.fw_lock);
 		return;
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ sfw_handle_server_rpc(struct srpc_server_rpc *rpc)
 		}
 
 	} else if (request->msg_ses_feats & ~LST_FEATS_MASK) {
-		/**
+		/*
 		 * NB: at this point, old version will ignore features and
 		 * create new session anyway, so console should be able
 		 * to handle this