btrfs: qgroup: Remove the unnecesaary spin lock for qgroup_rescan_running

After the previous patch, qgroup_rescan_running is protected by
btrfs_fs_info::qgroup_rescan_lock, thus no need for the extra spinlock.
Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

fs/btrfs/qgroup.c

@@ -3238,7 +3238,6 @@ qgroup_rescan_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 progress_objectid,
 	}
 
 	mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
-	spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
 
 	if (init_flags) {
 		if (fs_info->qgroup_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN) {
@@ -3253,7 +3252,6 @@ qgroup_rescan_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 progress_objectid,
 		}
 
 		if (ret) {
-			spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
 			mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
 			return ret;
 		}
@@ -3264,8 +3262,6 @@ qgroup_rescan_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 progress_objectid,
 		sizeof(fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress));
 	fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress.objectid = progress_objectid;
 	init_completion(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion);
-
-	spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
 
 	btrfs_init_work(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_work,
@@ -3342,9 +3338,7 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
-	spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
 	running = fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running;
-	spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
 
 	if (!running)