Commit e30250c9 authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro Committed by Ben Hutchings

sg_write()/bsg_write() is not fit to be called under KERNEL_DS

commit a0ac402c upstream.

Both damn things interpret userland pointers embedded into the payload;
worse, they are actually traversing those.  Leaving aside the bad
API design, this is very much _not_ safe to call with KERNEL_DS.
Bail out early if that happens.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
parent ba43cdd8
......@@ -675,6 +675,9 @@ bsg_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
dprintk("%s: write %Zd bytes\n", bd->name, count);
if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS)))
return -EINVAL;
bsg_set_block(bd, file);
bytes_written = 0;
......
......@@ -544,6 +544,9 @@ sg_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t * ppos)
sg_io_hdr_t *hp;
unsigned char cmnd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS)))
return -EINVAL;
if ((!(sfp = (Sg_fd *) filp->private_data)) || (!(sdp = sfp->parentdp)))
return -ENXIO;
SCSI_LOG_TIMEOUT(3, printk("sg_write: %s, count=%d\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment