Commit e3d280b3 authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] more ptrace updates

I've done the attached patch to collect & clean up all the things that
happened since yesterday.
parent a374c868
...@@ -66,8 +66,12 @@ static void release_task(struct task_struct * p) ...@@ -66,8 +66,12 @@ static void release_task(struct task_struct * p)
atomic_dec(&p->user->processes); atomic_dec(&p->user->processes);
security_ops->task_free_security(p); security_ops->task_free_security(p);
free_uid(p->user); free_uid(p->user);
BUG_ON(p->ptrace || !list_empty(&p->ptrace_list) || if (unlikely(p->ptrace)) {
!list_empty(&p->ptrace_children)); write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
__ptrace_unlink(p);
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
}
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&p->ptrace_list) || !list_empty(&p->ptrace_children));
unhash_process(p); unhash_process(p);
release_thread(p); release_thread(p);
...@@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ static inline void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct * father) ...@@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ static inline void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct * father)
* There are only two places where our children can be: * There are only two places where our children can be:
* *
* - in our child list * - in our child list
* - in the global ptrace list * - in our ptraced child list
* *
* Search them and reparent children. * Search them and reparent children.
*/ */
...@@ -443,14 +447,22 @@ static inline void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct * father) ...@@ -443,14 +447,22 @@ static inline void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct * father)
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
} }
static inline void zap_thread(task_t *p, task_t *father) static inline void zap_thread(task_t *p, task_t *father, int traced)
{ {
ptrace_unlink(p); /* If we were tracing the thread, release it; otherwise preserve the
list_del_init(&p->sibling); ptrace links. */
if (unlikely(traced)) {
task_t *trace_task = p->parent;
__ptrace_unlink(p);
p->ptrace = 1;
__ptrace_link(p, trace_task);
} else {
p->ptrace = 0; p->ptrace = 0;
list_del_init(&p->sibling);
p->parent = p->real_parent; p->parent = p->real_parent;
list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->parent->children); list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->parent->children);
}
if (p->state == TASK_ZOMBIE && p->exit_signal != -1) if (p->state == TASK_ZOMBIE && p->exit_signal != -1)
do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal); do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal);
/* /*
...@@ -541,11 +553,11 @@ static void exit_notify(void) ...@@ -541,11 +553,11 @@ static void exit_notify(void)
zap_again: zap_again:
list_for_each_safe(_p, _n, &current->children) list_for_each_safe(_p, _n, &current->children)
zap_thread(list_entry(_p,struct task_struct,sibling), current); zap_thread(list_entry(_p,struct task_struct,sibling), current, 0);
list_for_each_safe(_p, _n, &current->ptrace_children) list_for_each_safe(_p, _n, &current->ptrace_children)
zap_thread(list_entry(_p,struct task_struct,ptrace_list), current); zap_thread(list_entry(_p,struct task_struct,ptrace_list), current, 1);
/* /*
* reparent_thread might drop the tasklist lock, thus we could * zap_thread might drop the tasklist lock, thus we could
* have new children queued back from the ptrace list into the * have new children queued back from the ptrace list into the
* child list: * child list:
*/ */
...@@ -716,17 +728,11 @@ asmlinkage long sys_wait4(pid_t pid,unsigned int * stat_addr, int options, struc ...@@ -716,17 +728,11 @@ asmlinkage long sys_wait4(pid_t pid,unsigned int * stat_addr, int options, struc
retval = p->pid; retval = p->pid;
if (p->real_parent != p->parent) { if (p->real_parent != p->parent) {
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
ptrace_unlink(p); __ptrace_unlink(p);
do_notify_parent(p, SIGCHLD); do_notify_parent(p, SIGCHLD);
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
} else { } else
if (p->ptrace) {
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
ptrace_unlink(p);
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
}
release_task(p); release_task(p);
}
goto end_wait4; goto end_wait4;
default: default:
continue; continue;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment