Commit e841313b authored by Stephen Boyd's avatar Stephen Boyd Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

firmware: qcom_scm: Use proper types for dma mappings

[ Upstream commit 6e37ccf7 ]

We need to use the proper types and convert between physical addresses
and dma addresses here to avoid mismatch warnings. This is especially
important on systems with a different size for dma addresses and
physical addresses. Otherwise, we get the following warning:

  drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c: In function "qcom_scm_assign_mem":
  drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:469:47: error: passing argument 3 of "dma_alloc_coherent" from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]

We also fix the size argument to dma_free_coherent() because that size
doesn't need to be aligned after it's already aligned on the allocation
size. In fact, dma debugging expects the same arguments to be passed to
both the allocation and freeing sides of the functions so changing the
size is incorrect regardless.
Reported-by: default avatarIan Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi <akdwived@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: default avatarBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent ec481546
......@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/dma-direct.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
......@@ -449,6 +450,7 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
phys_addr_t mem_to_map_phys;
phys_addr_t dest_phys;
phys_addr_t ptr_phys;
dma_addr_t ptr_dma;
size_t mem_to_map_sz;
size_t dest_sz;
size_t src_sz;
......@@ -466,9 +468,10 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
ptr_sz = ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64) + ALIGN(mem_to_map_sz, SZ_64) +
ALIGN(dest_sz, SZ_64);
ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_phys, GFP_KERNEL);
ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ptr)
return -ENOMEM;
ptr_phys = dma_to_phys(__scm->dev, ptr_dma);
/* Fill source vmid detail */
src = ptr;
......@@ -498,7 +501,7 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
ret = __qcom_scm_assign_mem(__scm->dev, mem_to_map_phys, mem_to_map_sz,
ptr_phys, src_sz, dest_phys, dest_sz);
dma_free_coherent(__scm->dev, ALIGN(ptr_sz, SZ_64), ptr, ptr_phys);
dma_free_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, ptr, ptr_dma);
if (ret) {
dev_err(__scm->dev,
"Assign memory protection call failed %d.\n", ret);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment