Commit ead8f34c authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson Committed by Dave Airlie

drm/i915: Balance assert_rpm_wakelock_held() for !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM)

commit 09731280
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 17 14:17:42 2016 +0200

    drm/i915: Add helper to get a display power ref if it was already enabled

left the rpm wakelock assertions unbalanced if CONFIG_PM was disabled as
intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use() would return true without incrementing
the local bookkeeping required for the assertions.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
CC: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
parent fc77dbd3
......@@ -2349,22 +2349,20 @@ bool intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
int ret;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM))
return true;
ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(device);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM)) {
int ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(device);
/*
* In cases runtime PM is disabled by the RPM core and we get an
* -EINVAL return value we are not supposed to call this function,
* since the power state is undefined. This applies atm to the
* late/early system suspend/resume handlers.
* In cases runtime PM is disabled by the RPM core and we get
* an -EINVAL return value we are not supposed to call this
* function, since the power state is undefined. This applies
* atm to the late/early system suspend/resume handlers.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
if (ret <= 0)
return false;
}
atomic_inc(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment