sctp: fix BH handling on socket backlog

Now that the backlog processing is called with BH enabled, we have to
disable BH before taking the socket lock via bh_lock_sock() otherwise
it may dead lock:

sctp_backlog_rcv()
                bh_lock_sock(sk);

                if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
                        if (sk_add_backlog(sk, skb, sk->sk_rcvbuf))
                                sctp_chunk_free(chunk);
                        else
                                backloged = 1;
                } else
                        sctp_inq_push(inqueue, chunk);

                bh_unlock_sock(sk);

while sctp_inq_push() was disabling/enabling BH, but enabling BH
triggers pending softirq, which then may try to re-lock the socket in
sctp_rcv().

[  219.187215]  <IRQ>
[  219.187217]  [<ffffffff817ca3e0>] _raw_spin_lock+0x20/0x30
[  219.187223]  [<ffffffffa041888c>] sctp_rcv+0x48c/0xba0 [sctp]
[  219.187225]  [<ffffffff816e7db2>] ? nf_iterate+0x62/0x80
[  219.187226]  [<ffffffff816f1b14>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x94/0x1e0
[  219.187228]  [<ffffffff816f1e1f>] ip_local_deliver+0x6f/0xf0
[  219.187229]  [<ffffffff816f1a80>] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x3b0/0x3b0
[  219.187230]  [<ffffffff816f17a8>] ip_rcv_finish+0xd8/0x3b0
[  219.187232]  [<ffffffff816f2122>] ip_rcv+0x282/0x3a0
[  219.187233]  [<ffffffff810d8bb6>] ? update_curr+0x66/0x180
[  219.187235]  [<ffffffff816abac4>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x524/0xa90
[  219.187236]  [<ffffffff810d8e00>] ? update_cfs_shares+0x30/0xf0
[  219.187237]  [<ffffffff810d557c>] ? __enqueue_entity+0x6c/0x70
[  219.187239]  [<ffffffff810dc454>] ? enqueue_entity+0x204/0xdf0
[  219.187240]  [<ffffffff816ac048>] __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60
[  219.187242]  [<ffffffff816ad1ce>] process_backlog+0x9e/0x140
[  219.187243]  [<ffffffff816ac8ec>] net_rx_action+0x22c/0x370
[  219.187245]  [<ffffffff817cd352>] __do_softirq+0x112/0x2e7
[  219.187247]  [<ffffffff817cc3bc>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30
[  219.187247]  <EOI>
[  219.187248]  [<ffffffff810aa1c8>] do_softirq.part.14+0x38/0x40
[  219.187249]  [<ffffffff810aa24d>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x7d/0x80
[  219.187254]  [<ffffffffa0408428>] sctp_inq_push+0x68/0x80 [sctp]
[  219.187258]  [<ffffffffa04190f1>] sctp_backlog_rcv+0x151/0x1c0 [sctp]
[  219.187260]  [<ffffffff81692b07>] __release_sock+0x87/0xf0
[  219.187261]  [<ffffffff81692ba0>] release_sock+0x30/0xa0
[  219.187265]  [<ffffffffa040e46d>] sctp_accept+0x17d/0x210 [sctp]
[  219.187266]  [<ffffffff810e7510>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
[  219.187268]  [<ffffffff8172d52c>] inet_accept+0x3c/0x130
[  219.187269]  [<ffffffff8168d7a3>] SYSC_accept4+0x103/0x210
[  219.187271]  [<ffffffff817ca2ba>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x1a/0x20
[  219.187272]  [<ffffffff81692bfc>] ? release_sock+0x8c/0xa0
[  219.187276]  [<ffffffffa0413e22>] ? sctp_inet_listen+0x62/0x1b0 [sctp]
[  219.187277]  [<ffffffff8168f2d0>] SyS_accept+0x10/0x20

Fixes: 860fbbc3 ("sctp: prepare for socket backlog behavior change")
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net/sctp/input.c

@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ int sctp_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		 */
 
 		sk = rcvr->sk;
+		local_bh_disable();
 		bh_lock_sock(sk);
 
 		if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
@@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ int sctp_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 			sctp_inq_push(inqueue, chunk);
 
 		bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+		local_bh_enable();
 
 		/* If the chunk was backloged again, don't drop refs */
 		if (backloged)

net/sctp/inqueue.c

@@ -89,12 +89,10 @@ void sctp_inq_push(struct sctp_inq *q, struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
 	 * Eventually, we should clean up inqueue to not rely
 	 * on the BH related data structures.
 	 */
-	local_bh_disable();
 	list_add_tail(&chunk->list, &q->in_chunk_list);
 	if (chunk->asoc)
 		chunk->asoc->stats.ipackets++;
 	q->immediate.func(&q->immediate);
-	local_bh_enable();
 }
 
 /* Peek at the next chunk on the inqeue. */