Commit f56029b5 authored by Nishanth Aravamudan's avatar Nishanth Aravamudan Committed by Benjamin Herrenschmidt

powerpc/pseries/xics: Use cpu_possible_mask rather than cpu_all_mask

Current firmware only allows us to send IRQs to the first processor or
all processors. We currently check to see if the passed in mask is equal
to the all_mask, but the firmware is only considering whether the
request is for the equivalent of the possible_mask. Thus, we think the
request is for some subset of CPUs and only assign IRQs to the first CPU
(on systems without irqbalance running) as evidenced by
/proc/interrupts. By using possible_mask instead, we account for this
and proper interleaving of interrupts occurs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
parent bc0df9ec
...@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int get_irq_server(unsigned int virq, const struct cpumask *cpumask, ...@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int get_irq_server(unsigned int virq, const struct cpumask *cpumask,
if (!distribute_irqs) if (!distribute_irqs)
return default_server; return default_server;
if (!cpumask_equal(cpumask, cpu_all_mask)) { if (!cpumask_subset(cpu_possible_mask, cpumask)) {
int server = cpumask_first_and(cpu_online_mask, cpumask); int server = cpumask_first_and(cpu_online_mask, cpumask);
if (server < nr_cpu_ids) if (server < nr_cpu_ids)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment