Commit fc32490b authored by Andrii Nakryiko's avatar Andrii Nakryiko Committed by Daniel Borkmann

selftests/bpf: Fix test_progs's parsing of test numbers

When specifying disjoint set of tests, test_progs doesn't set skipped test's
array elements to false. This leads to spurious execution of tests that should
have been skipped. Fix it by explicitly initializing them to false.

Fixes: 3a516a0a ("selftests/bpf: add sub-tests support for test_progs")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200314013932.4035712-2-andriin@fb.com
parent 94c2f50b
......@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static int parse_str_list(const char *s, struct str_set *set)
int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
{
int i, set_len = 0, num, start = 0, end = -1;
int i, set_len = 0, new_len, num, start = 0, end = -1;
bool *set = NULL, *tmp, parsing_end = false;
char *next;
......@@ -459,20 +459,21 @@ int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
return -EINVAL;
if (end + 1 > set_len) {
set_len = end + 1;
tmp = realloc(set, set_len);
new_len = end + 1;
tmp = realloc(set, new_len);
if (!tmp) {
free(set);
return -ENOMEM;
}
for (i = set_len; i < start; i++)
tmp[i] = false;
set = tmp;
set_len = new_len;
}
for (i = start; i <= end; i++) {
for (i = start; i <= end; i++)
set[i] = true;
}
}
if (!set)
return -EINVAL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment