Commit 25a51178 authored by Łukasz Nowak's avatar Łukasz Nowak

- revert 29067, as right now test report is informative enough (method id + docstring)


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@29759 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
parent c6db5c80
......@@ -1355,8 +1355,10 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
# Tests
def test_TradeConditionTradeModelLineBasicComposition(self):
# If Trade Condition is specialised by another Trade Condition they
# Trade Model Lines shall be merged.
"""
If Trade Condition is specialised by another Trade Condition they
Trade Model Lines shall be merged.
"""
trade_condition_1 = self.createTradeCondition()
trade_condition_2 = self.createTradeCondition()
......@@ -1420,22 +1422,24 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
)
def test_findSpecialiseValueList(self):
# check that findSpecialiseValueList is able to return all the inheritance
# model tree using Depth-first search
#
# trade_condition_1
# / \
# / \
# / \
# trade_condition_2 trade_condition_3
# |
# |
# |
# trade_condition_4
#
# According to Depth-first search algorithm, result of this graph is:
# [trade_condition_1, trade_condition_2, trade_condition_3,
# trade_condition_4]
'''
check that findSpecialiseValueList is able to return all the inheritance
model tree using Depth-first search
trade_condition_1
/ \
/ \
/ \
trade_condition_2 trade_condition_3
|
|
|
trade_condition_4
According to Depth-first search algorithm, result of this graph is:
[trade_condition_1, trade_condition_2, trade_condition_3,
trade_condition_4]
'''
trade_condition_1 = self.createTradeCondition()
trade_condition_2 = self.createTradeCondition()
trade_condition_3 = self.createTradeCondition()
......@@ -1503,25 +1507,26 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
)
def test_getTradeModelLineComposedList(self):
# Test that list of contribution/application relations is sorted to do easy traversal
#
# Let assume such graph of contribution/application dependency:
#
# D -----> B
# / \
# E ---/ > A
# /
# F -----> C
# /
# G ---/
#
# It shall return list which is sorted like:
# * (DE) B (FG) C A
# or
# * (FG) C (DE) B A
# or
# * (DEFG) (BC) A
# where everything in parenthesis can be not sorted
"""Test that list of contribution/application relations is sorted to do easy traversal
Let assume such graph of contribution/application dependency:
D -----> B
/ \
E ---/ > A
/
F -----> C
/
G ---/
It shall return list which is sorted like:
* (DE) B (FG) C A
or
* (FG) C (DE) B A
or
* (DEFG) (BC) A
where everything in parenthesis can be not sorted
"""
trade_condition = self.createTradeCondition()
A = self.createTradeModelLine(trade_condition, reference='A',
......@@ -1558,19 +1563,20 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
[q.getReference() for q in [G, F, E, D, C, B, A]])
def test_getComplexTradeModelLineComposedList(self):
# Test that list of contribution/application relations is sorted to do easy traversal
#
# Let assume such graph of contribution/application dependency:
#
# /--------\
# / \
# A----+ -----B-----+-D
# \ /
# \----C---/
#
# It shall return list which is sorted like:
# * A (BC) D
# where everything in parenthesis can be not sorted
"""Test that list of contribution/application relations is sorted to do easy traversal
Let assume such graph of contribution/application dependency:
/--------\
/ \
A----+ -----B-----+-D
\ /
\----C---/
It shall return list which is sorted like:
* A (BC) D
where everything in parenthesis can be not sorted
"""
trade_condition = self.createTradeCondition()
C = self.createTradeModelLine(trade_condition, reference='C',
......@@ -1596,9 +1602,11 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
[q.getReference() for q in [A, B, C, D]])
def test_tradeModelLineWithFixedPrice(self):
# Check it's possible to have fixed quantity on lines. Sometimes we want
# to say "discount 10 euros" or "pay more 10 euros" instead of saying "10%
# discount from total"
"""
Check it's possible to have fixed quantity on lines. Sometimes we want
to say "discount 10 euros" or "pay more 10 euros" instead of saying "10%
discount from total"
"""
trade_condition = self.createTradeCondition()
# create a model line with 100 euros
......@@ -1628,7 +1636,9 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
self.assertEqual(total_amount, 100 - 10)
def test_getAggregatedAmountList(self):
# Test for case, when discount contributes to tax, and order has mix of contributing lines
"""
Test for case, when discount contributes to tax, and order has mix of contributing lines
"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.AGGREGATED_AMOUNT_LIST_COMMON_SEQUENCE_STRING
......@@ -1667,7 +1677,9 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
""" + AGGREGATED_AMOUNT_LIST_CHECK_SEQUENCE_STRING
def test_getAggregatedAmountListOrderSpecialise(self):
# Test for case, when discount contributes to tax, and order has mix of contributing lines and order itself defines Trade Model Line
"""
Test for case, when discount contributes to tax, and order has mix of contributing lines and order itself defines Trade Model Line
"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self\
.ORDER_SPECIALISE_AGGREGATED_AMOUNT_COMMON_SEQUENCE_STRING
......@@ -1676,13 +1688,15 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_getAggregatedAmountList_afterUpdateAggregatedAmountList(self):
# Test for case, when discount contributes to tax, and order has mix of contributing lines
#
# Check if it is stable if updateAggregatedAmountList was invoked.
#
# Note: This test assumes, that somethings contributes after update, shall
# be rewritten in a way, that adds explicitly movement which shall
# not be aggregated.
"""
Test for case, when discount contributes to tax, and order has mix of contributing lines
Check if it is stable if updateAggregatedAmountList was invoked.
Note: This test assumes, that somethings contributes after update, shall
be rewritten in a way, that adds explicitly movement which shall
not be aggregated.
"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.AGGREGATED_AMOUNT_LIST_COMMON_SEQUENCE_STRING + """
UpdateAggregatedAmountListOnOrder
......@@ -1705,14 +1719,14 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
""" + AGGREGATED_AMOUNT_SIMULATION_CHECK_SEQUENCE_STRING
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationExpand(self):
# Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule
"""Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.TRADE_MODEL_RULE_SIMULATION_SEQUENCE_STRING
sequence_list.addSequenceString(sequence_string)
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationReexpand(self):
# Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule with reexpanding
"""Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule with reexpanding"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.TRADE_MODEL_RULE_SIMULATION_SEQUENCE_STRING + """
ModifyAgainOrderLineTaxed
......@@ -1724,8 +1738,7 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationReexpandResourceChange(self):
# Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule with reexpanding when
# resource changes on model
"""Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule with reexpanding when resource changes on model"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.TRADE_MODEL_RULE_SIMULATION_SEQUENCE_STRING + """
CreateServiceTax
......@@ -1766,7 +1779,7 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationWithoutBPM(self):
# Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule when there is no BPM
"""Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule when there is no BPM"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.COMMON_DOCUMENTS_CREATION_SEQUENCE_STRING + """
CreateTradeCondition
......@@ -1788,8 +1801,7 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationWithoutTradeCondition(self):
# Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule when there is no Trade
# Condition
"""Tests tree of simulations from Trade Model Rule when there is no Trade Condition"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.COMMON_DOCUMENTS_CREATION_SEQUENCE_STRING + """
CreateOrder
......@@ -1853,7 +1865,7 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationBuildInvoiceNewTradeCondition(self):
# Check that after changing trade condition invoice is diverged
"""Check that after changing trade condition invoice is diverged"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.TRADE_MODEL_RULE_SIMULATION_SEQUENCE_STRING
sequence_string += """
......@@ -1891,8 +1903,7 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationBuildInvoiceNewInvoiceLineSupport(self):
# Check how is supported addition of invoice line to invoice build from
# order
"""Check how is supported addition of invoice line to invoice build from order"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.TRADE_MODEL_RULE_SIMULATION_SEQUENCE_STRING
sequence_string += """
......@@ -1936,8 +1947,7 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationBuildInvoiceInvoiceLineModifyDivergencyAndSolving(self):
# Check that after changing invoice line invoice is properly diverged and
# it is possible to solve
"""Check that after changing invoice line invoice is properly diverged and it is possible to solve"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.TRADE_MODEL_RULE_SIMULATION_SEQUENCE_STRING
sequence_string += """
......@@ -1975,8 +1985,7 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationBuildInvoiceBuildInvoiceTransactionLines(self):
# Check that having properly configured invoice transaction rule it
# invoice transaction lines are nicely generated and have proper amounts
"""Check that having properly configured invoice transaction rule it invoice transaction lines are nicely generated and have proper amounts"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.TRADE_MODEL_RULE_SIMULATION_SEQUENCE_STRING
sequence_string += """
......@@ -2049,7 +2058,7 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
"""
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationPackingListSplitBuildInvoiceBuildDifferentRatio(self):
# Check building invoice after splitting packing list using different ratio
"""Check building invoice after splitting packing list using different ratio"""
self.modified_packing_list_line_quantity_ratio = 0.4
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_list.addSequenceString(
......@@ -2057,35 +2066,37 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_TradeModelRuleSimulationPackingListSplitBuildInvoiceBuild(self):
# Check building invoice after splitting packing list
"""Check building invoice after splitting packing list"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_list.addSequenceString(
self.PACKING_LIST_SPLIT_INVOICE_BUILD_SEQUENCE_STRING)
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_getAggregatedAmountListWithComplexModelLinesCreateInEasyOrder(self):
# Test the return of getAggregatedAmountList in the case of many model lines
# depending each others. In this test, lines are created in the order of the
# dependencies (it means that if a line A depend of a line B, line B is
# created before A). This is the most easy case.
#
# Dependency tree :
# ModelLineTaxContributingToTotalTax : A
# ModelLineDiscountContributingToTotalDiscount : B
# ModelLineTaxContributingToTotalTax2 : C
# ModelLineTotalTax : D
# ModelLineTotalDiscount : E
#
# D E
# \ /
# \ /
# \ /
# C B
# \ /
# \ /
# \/
# A
# Model line creation order : E, D, C, B, A
"""
Test the return of getAggregatedAmountList in the case of many model lines
depending each others. In this test, lines are created in the order of the
dependencies (it means that if a line A depend of a line B, line B is
created before A). This is the most easy case.
Dependency tree :
ModelLineTaxContributingToTotalTax : A
ModelLineDiscountContributingToTotalDiscount : B
ModelLineTaxContributingToTotalTax2 : C
ModelLineTotalTax : D
ModelLineTotalDiscount : E
D E
\ /
\ /
\ /
C B
\ /
\ /
\/
A
Model line creation order : E, D, C, B, A
"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.COMMON_DOCUMENTS_CREATION_SEQUENCE_STRING + """
CreateBusinessProcess
......@@ -2125,30 +2136,32 @@ class TestTradeModelLine(TestTradeModelLineMixin):
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=True)
def test_getAggregatedAmountListWithComplexModelLinesCreateInRandomOrder(self):
# Test the return of getAggregatedAmountList in the case of many model lines
# depending each others. In this test, lines are created in a random order,
# not in the dependencies order (it means that if a line A depend of a
# line B, line A can be created before line B). getAggregatedAmountList
# should be able to handle this case and redo calculation until all
# dependencies are satisfied
#
# Dependency tree :
# ModelLineTaxContributingToTotalTax : A
# ModelLineDiscountContributingToTotalDiscount : B
# ModelLineTaxContributingToTotalTax2 : C
# ModelLineTotalTax : D
# ModelLineTotalDiscount : E
#
# D E
# \ /
# \ /
# \ /
# C B
# \ /
# \ /
# \/
# A
# Model line creation order : A, C, D, B, E
"""
Test the return of getAggregatedAmountList in the case of many model lines
depending each others. In this test, lines are created in a random order,
not in the dependencies order (it means that if a line A depend of a
line B, line A can be created before line B). getAggregatedAmountList
should be able to handle this case and redo calculation until all
dependencies are satisfied
Dependency tree :
ModelLineTaxContributingToTotalTax : A
ModelLineDiscountContributingToTotalDiscount : B
ModelLineTaxContributingToTotalTax2 : C
ModelLineTotalTax : D
ModelLineTotalDiscount : E
D E
\ /
\ /
\ /
C B
\ /
\ /
\/
A
Model line creation order : A, C, D, B, E
"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = self.COMMON_DOCUMENTS_CREATION_SEQUENCE_STRING + """
CreateBusinessProcess
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment