sync.WorkGroup: Provide "with" support
So that it becomes possible to write with WorkGroup(ctx) as wg: wg.go(f1) wg.go(f2) instead of wg = WorkGroup(ctx) defer(wg.wait) wg.go(f1) wg.go(f2) or wg = WorkGroup(ctx) wg.go(f1) wg.go(f2) wg.wait() This is sometimes handy and is referred to as "structured concurrency" in Python world. sync.Sema, sync.Mutex, sync.RWMutex already support "with". sync.WaitGroup is imho too low-level, but we might consider adding "with" support for it in the future as well. In general pygolang way is to use defer instead of plugging all classes with __enter__/__exit__ "with" support, but for small well-known class of concurrency-related things its seems "with" support is worth it: - having "with" for sync.Mutex+co allows it to be used as a drop-in replacement instead of threading.Lock+co, and - having "with" for sync.WorkGroup - the most commonly-used tool to spawn jobs and wait for their completion - makes it on-par with "structured concurrency". /reviewed-on !12
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment