Move issuable title form to a new partial

Continue to refactor issuable form view (after !7249).

Part of #23864.

See merge request !7453

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

User avatar in mention autocomplete in comment box

## What does this MR do?
This MR shows avatar in `@<username>` autocomplete in comment box. Also shows first latter as avatar if there is no group avatar is available.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?
This MR closes issue  #22790 
 
## Screenshots (if relevant)
**Before**
![Screen_Shot_2016-10-25_at_17.44.44](/uploads/c44de668c7a2d482594423ebcc917440/Screen_Shot_2016-10-25_at_17.44.44.png)
**After**
![mention-avatar](/uploads/7cd2fbefa42e4a5f14335e057cf6978a/mention-avatar.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #22790

See merge request !6865

Copy messaging guidelines

Update documentation to start having consistency and guidelines for copy (messaging) in GitLab.

See merge request !7467

Add new file for copy (messaging) guidelines

Update copy guidelines

Fix typo

Add forms to guidelines

Simplify Copy heading

Refine copy page. Add images and table

Fix toc link on Copy page

Clarify LDAP troubleshooting ldap_search example

A customer noted an error/lack of clarity in the LDAP documentation
    with the `ldap_search` example. Previously, if taken literally, the
    customer may have expected the `$` variables to be automatically
    replaced or if they paste the exact `user_filter` contents the
    parentheses would have been incorrect. Let's just simply the filter
    and use exactly what's in the configuration.

See merge request !7489

A customer noted an error/lack of clarity in the LDAP documentation
with the `ldap_search` example. Previously, if taken literally, the
customer may have expected the `$` variables to be automatically
replaced or if they paste the exact `user_filter` contents the
parentheses would have been incorrect. Let's just simply the filter
and use exactly what's in the configuration.

Fix invalid JSON in Builds API doc

See merge request !7475

Add ref parameter for triggering builds with gitlab webhook from other project.

Currently GitLab can trigger builds from external tools like curl.
But there is no way to trigger builds with webhook from another GitLab project.
Executing webhook like `/projects/:id/trigger/builds?token=TOKEN&ref=master` results in such message from server:
```
400 No builds created
```

Problem is the ref from request body takes precedence of the ref from query string.
System tries to trigger build for nonexistent branch instead of `master`.
This is the feature of the Grape framework used to build GitLab api.

This MR adds optional `ref` parameter into the api url:
```
/projects/:id/ref/:ref/trigger/builds?token=TOKEN
```

This will lead that the ref in the url will have precedence of the ref inside request body.

This solution provides compatibility with current API urls.

Closes #23584

See merge request !7022

Adds es6-promise polyfill

## What does this MR do?
Adds [es6-promise](https://github.com/stefanpenner/es6-promise) polyfill.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24492

See merge request !7482

adds entry in CHANGELOG

no uninitialized variable and unnecessary if statement

formatting issue in CHANGELOG

resolves scss lint warings

cleanup: unnecessary css classes

adds css class that cleaned up by mistake

replaces snake_case variables name with camelCase

removes unnecessary css class and adds white color border for avatar

moves changelog entry from 8.13 to 8.14

remove bottom margin from avatar-inline

resolves lint warnings

rebased and moves changelog entry to 8.14

fixes avatar shifting on hover

adds entry at top of 8.14 section in CHANGELOG.md

calls sanitization for gl.utils

syncing changelog with master and created changelog files using cli

changes changelog title

Revert changelog compilations for 8.14 RCs

See merge request !7478

Grapify the notes API

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Related to #22928

See merge request !7375

Darken todo badge on hover

## What does this MR do?
Darkens todo badge on hover

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_10.37.54_AM](/uploads/7636834062fcce3517b0708304ad57c4/Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_10.37.54_AM.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_10.37.42_AM](/uploads/d79be1285b926f28f71c103c4ab54d5a/Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_10.37.42_AM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7462

Adds changelog

This reverts commit 605d338a.

This reverts commit 5d4aeae9.

Grapify the group API

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Related to #22928

See merge request !7359

Grapify the merge request API

Grapfiy the merge request API. I removed the test for checking if the source branch can be changed since this is an unused parameter. IMHO the test does not make sense.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Related to #22928

See merge request !7358

Issue #4270: Recursive option for files through API

## What does this MR do?
- Adds recursive param to tree API request. With this param we can get all repository paths in a single request. 
- Related [old github pull request](https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/pull/9311)

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?
Requested in #4270 
## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [X] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [X] API support added
- Tests
  - [X] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Requested in #4270

See merge request !6088

Add button to delete all merged branches

## What does this MR do?

It adds a button to the branches page that the user can use to delete all the branches that are already merged. This can be used to clean up all the branches that were forgotten to delete while merging MRs.

**Note**  
~~This MR is WIP until MR !6408 is merged.~~

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

The UX of the actual "Delete merged branches" button.

## Why was this MR needed?

Fixes #21076

## Screenshots
![Branches page without "Delete all merged" button](/uploads/3a2936a83c3547a0fce92a74af880a2d/Screen_Shot_2016-10-17_at_20.06.30.png)

Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-10-17_at_20.07.11](/uploads/55efcebf4e0a45dbfc70ba4a11ca152c/Screen_Shot_2016-10-17_at_20.07.11.png)


After:

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #21076

See merge request !6449

The JSON of the example responses were missing a few `,` and therefor
invalid. This adds them to make those JSONs valid.