- 22 Feb, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
On documents, we have an "Export" action for OOoDocument_viewConvertDialog. When erp5_ods_style is installed, "Export to Spreadsheet" is added as a global action. Both these actions were translated as "Exporter" in french, which is confusing and a bit incorrect. Use a proper, different translation for "Export to Spreadsheet"
-
- 19 Feb, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This test was comparing lines returned in unspecified order, sort the lines to be sure.
-
- 18 Feb, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
- 17 Feb, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
fix pylint warnings
-
Jérome Perrin authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1363
-
- 16 Feb, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
- 15 Feb, 2021 9 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
"contact us" feature of erp5_web uses erp5_crm testTemplateTool depend on the actual order of installation of business template, so update it now that the order has changed. configurator scripts also had to be updated, so that erp5_ingestion_mysql_innodb_catalog is installed before erp5_web/erp5_crm because since erp5_crm depends on ingestion, it will install erp5_ingestion_mysql_innodb_catalog, which has new tables and SQL methods for indexation, so it needs to be installed with `update_catalog=True`. As we can see here, configurator uses installBusinessTemplateListFromRepository to install business templates one by one (in the same order that they are added with addConfigurationItem), and pass update_catalog only for business templates which add new tables/indexation methods and needs a catalog update after install, but what happened is that we install erp5_web with update_catalog=False, which will install erp5_ingestion_mysql_innodb_catalog, also with update_catalog=False so the activities to install business templates fail with errors like: ProgrammingError: (1146, "Table 'erp5_test_*.email' doesn't exist")
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Since 459093f3 (ERP5Form: implement a basic checkConsistency for ProxyField, 2021-01-26) we can detect inconsistentencies in ProxyFields internal data structures. These are the changes after using checkConsistency(fixit=True) for erp5_web
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This relation field is used to select the web pages that will be displayed, by using the standard ERP5 document management feature of selecting the best applicable page with the same reference, but this list did not show the reference of the web page
-
- 12 Feb, 2021 4 commits
-
-
Nicolas Wavrant authored
-
Nicolas Wavrant authored
-
Nicolas Wavrant authored
for security reasons, info on users, or existence of usernames shouldn't be leaked from the system.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
manage_FTPget is an API to serve the file content to response, it is not suitable to just get the file/page template content like we need here. It was causing issues when running through activities, because timerserver responses does not have the setBase method, but is also wrong because large files are streamed to response directly. Zope does not really offer an unified API to get the source of page templates or files, except the PrincipiaSearchSource method which it uses for its builtin search engine. It seems suitable to use here as well. Also add a test for the case where web pages are in a OFS.File, only the case of PageTemplate was covered.
-
- 10 Feb, 2021 4 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Use the `ui-list-grid` class on a `ul` element.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
``` return gadget.getTranslationDict([Foo]) .push(function (translation_dict) { console.log(translation_dict['Foo']) }); ```
-
Romain Courteaud authored
``` return gadget.getCommandUrlForDict({ foo_key: { command: 'display' } }) .push(function (url_dict) { console.log(url_dict.foo_key); }); ```
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
erp5_web_renderjs_ui_test: Add page to be used as example of links to extra menu and cover it with test
-
- 09 Feb, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
The query planner does not seem to notice that we are trying to know if any row exists matching a set of dependency values, and it keeps scanning multiple row for each value - which is unproductive. So split dependency queries from (pseudo-code) WHERE <column{,s}> IN <values{, pairs}> to unions of WHERE <column{,s}> = <value{, pair}> LIMIT 1 which produces query plans which do stop immediately when finding a candidate row. On a serialization_tag query with 40 values and real-world indexations, this reduces the number of rows scanned by mariadb from 500 (<10% efficiency) to 40 (100% efficiency). The produced SQL is significantly larger (~3x, around 500kB on real-world sample data, but may vary a lot depending on value length), but if this has any effect is is more than compensated by the improved query plan efficiency.
-
- 08 Feb, 2021 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
See merge request !1355
-
Jérome Perrin authored
For test components, we don't use getBusinessTemplateList but define the business templates to be installed as (test) dependencies of the business template containing the test.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
update test after c3eb0b30 , because non editable editor now render HTML
-
- 05 Feb, 2021 3 commits
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!957
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1353
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
currently with a test that tests document_connection
-
- 04 Feb, 2021 6 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Ensure float/integer field can align right on the listbox See nexedi/erp5@cfbc621b
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
This was removed from products in previous commits
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Nowadays instead of creating many portal types, we use `use` category to separate different types of movements, so it makes sense to filter by use, the same way that we already were able to filter by portal type.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Let's be consistent and use the default size.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
When `Form.proxifyField` is used to make a proxy field from a field which has only a TALES and no value, it creates a proxy field with inconsistent internal data structures where `has_value` method does not work as expected. As a consequence, proxy fields to list fields are often broken in the ods/odt rendering. Here is a scenario to reproduce the problem: * add `Base_viewDummyFieldLibrary` ERP5 Form * add a `LinesField`, with id `your_test_base_field`. Change `size` to 1 (not really required but I did this in screenshots here) * add another `LinesField`, with id `your_test_field` and in this field: * set a `default` (`2`) in values, it's only needed to visualise the problem in ods style: ![set default and no items](/uploads/0cb9e229b0ca6761bb15f3d8845ea3f8/image.png) * set `items` in TALES (`python: [('one', '1'), ('two', '2')]`) , this will be the problem ![set items in TALES](/uploads/93d90f57e15afdcca60324675b59086a/image.png) * So far, when this is rendered as ODS, everything is fine: ![ODS before](/uploads/ce387cd7a5146585104470bf099f890b/image.png) this is also what we see in html style view: ![html before](/uploads/650330951ed286576f8366bbd5c44139/image.png) * use the proxify action, to make `your_test_field` be a proxy field to `your_test_base_field` ![proxify action](/uploads/9ff7b29141ce7f170f340c842fd76830/image.png) * result of proxify action looks good, both for values: ![values after proxify](/uploads/a9f7df3cd2d0af1e036aeff352624760/image.png) and for TALES: ![TALES after proxify](/uploads/aeaaa45cc9e91e9327781d85ec1efd57/image.png) * but after this rendering the form with ODS becomes broken: ![ODS after proxify](/uploads/d4e7be3251c596de35333526d4f6277a/image.png) even though it looks fine with html views. `erp5_ods_style` knows how to render list fields and it uses the "display" (two) and not the "value" (2), this is done [here](https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/blob/451ce4137dc1d006bc2cd155535523d51a928150/bt5/erp5_ods_style/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_ods_style/field_ods_macro.zpt#L60) with a check depending on `field.has_value("items")`. `has_value` is implemented like [this](https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/blob/451ce4137dc1d006bc2cd155535523d51a928150/product/ERP5Form/ProxyField.py#L598-611) for proxy fields: ```python def has_value(self, id): """ Return true if the field defines such a value. """ result = None if (id in self.widget.property_names) or \ (not self.is_delegated(id)): result = ZMIField.has_value(self, id) else: proxy_field = self.getTemplateField() if proxy_field is not None: result = proxy_field.has_value(id) return result ``` and like [this](https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/blob/451ce4137dc1d006bc2cd155535523d51a928150/product/Formulator/Field.py#L80-86) for traditional fields: ```python def has_value(self, id): """Return true if the field defines such a value. """ if self.values.has_key(id) or self.form.has_field(id): return 1 else: return 0 ``` when the value is defined on the proxy field and not delegated to template field, the condition is `self.values.has_key(id)`. But `Form.proxifyField` when transforming a traditional field in a proxy field does not keep the `id` in `self.values` if it's only needed in `self.tales`. This is the root cause of this problem, if we inspect the field, it is something like this: ``` (Pdb) self <ProxyField at /erp5/portal_skins/custom/Base_viewDummyFieldLibrary/your_test_field> (Pdb) pp self.tales {'field_id': '', 'form_id': '', 'items': <Products.Formulator.TALESField.TALESMethod object at 0x7ffa705c7450 oid 0x572626 in <Connection at 7ffa42c1a610>>} (Pdb) pp self.values {'default': '2', 'field_id': 'your_test_base_field', 'form_id': 'Base_viewDummyFieldLibrary', 'title': 'Test Field'} (Pdb) self.has_value('items') 0 (Pdb) ``` If we edit the proxy field, it will repair itself, because the proxy field edit method maintain `self.tales` and `self.values` consistent, but this is not the case with`Form.proxifyField`, which mutate directly `.tales` and `.values` and can make them have different keys - which is not supposed to happen. The problem is that most of the proxy fields we have have been generated by `Form.proxifyField`, so for most of our fields the XML data of business template has this inconsistency. We could have took the easy way and make change `ProxyField.has_value` to understand this case, but it's probably better to fix the data. `erp5_hal_json` also uses `field.has_value` in some places, so it's better to fix at field level and not to address this in `erp5_ods_style` and `erp5_odt_style`. These changes: - add a little more test coverage for `ProxyField.has_value` ( at first I thought the problem was only in `has_value`) - Fix `Form.proxifyField` - add a `ProxyField.checkConsistency` to check that `.values` and `.tales` are in sync - or more exactly that all entries from `.tales` are also in `.values`, because this is what cause the problem with `has_value`. - re-export all proxy fields after cleaning up their `.values` and `.tales`, using `checkConsistency(fixit=True)` on all proxy fields. See merge request nexedi/erp5!1352
-
- 03 Feb, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Try to support displaying web js site from google cache, which can not access original gadget, due to cross origin ajax query forbidden. Display original content instead and load the default CSS in such case.
-
- 02 Feb, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-