ZODB Components: Use regex to check whether a class of the same name as the Component reference is defined.

Until now, there was a very basic string check which didn't handle such cases:
  class DocumentReferenceAnything():
    pass
  class DocumentReference():
    pass

=> _message_reference_class_not_defined was incorrectly raised.

Put auto-generated _getAcquireLocalRoles at the end of mro, removing it
from Base.
Also, document why it is treated specially here.
Also, add _getAcquireLocalRoles methods on a few leaf classes whose
instances fake being portal types, without actually being proper document
instances. At least, the ones which are detected in unit tests. The
proper fix would likely rather be to make them proper document classes,
but this carries data migration concerns which go beyond the scope of
this regression fix (_getAcquireLocalRoles was not possible to override
anymore).

This allows code of movement group to still works when they use
setter/getters defined by property sheets

Fully rewrite portal_simulation.mergeDeliveryList to use builders to reconstruct new
merged delivery.

Add parameter "merge_delivery" to builder. This parameter is used when
merge should be done in such a way that movement group at delivery
level are ignored

For example, testReceiptRecoginition employs numpy matrix calculation methods
that try to utilize all the CPU in the computer. This behavior is harmlfull
when there are several testReciptRecongnition is running in a testnode which
has 40 CPUs.

To get the listbox cell value : code was getting last proxy target
instead of browsing the full proxy target stack.

/bug #20190111-1F86B7B
https://nexedijs.erp5.net/#/bug_module/20190111-1F86B7B

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!856

We randomly have unkilled firefox process remaining. Make sure
to kill them.

/bug #20190204-1BF3A5A
https://nexedijs.erp5.net/#/bug_module/20190204-1BF3A5A

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!848

- local_roles: ( Assignee OR Assignor ) AND other_unknown_id: value

    [All criterions (AND)_______ v]
    [-][local_roles_____________ v] -> |Type             |  -.
       [Equal to (at least one)_ v]    |Modification Date|   :
       [Assignee________________  ]    |Title            |   :
       [Assignor________________  ]    |Reference        |   :
       [________________________  ]    |Description      |   : search_column_list
                                       |State            |   :
    [-][other_unknown_id________ v]    |Searchable Text  |   :
       [Equal to________________ v]    |Search Expression|  -'
       [value___________________  ]    |local_roles      |  -.
                                       |other_unknown_id |  -' additional_search_column_list

- the "Equal to (at least one)" operator is displayed in the same listbox as "Equal to" and "Contains" ;
- this filter item can have multiple input value field ;
- one input value field has to be filled (required) like on the other filter items ;
- when extended_search is `title: ( "One" OR "Two" )`, behavior changed :

    ________before________  ______________now______________

         Filter Editor               Filter Editor
    [ At least one (OR) v]  [ All criterions (AND)______ v]
    [-][ Title_________ v]  [-][ Title__________________ v]
       [ Equal to______ v]     [ Equal to (at least one) v]
       [ One___________ x]     [ One____________________ x]
    [-][ Title_________ v]     [ Two____________________ x]
       [ Equal to______ v]     [ _______________________  ]
       [ Two___________ x]  [+]
    [+]

         Search bar                  Search bar
    [One][Two][ _______  ]  [One][Two][ ________________  ]

Activate copy/paste/delete buttons on form list and form view.

When selection listbox lines, only use what is visible / checked.
This is required because of list methods which do not support catalog queries.

This changes the behaviour of mass workflow transition action and delete action,
but at least, it is consistent everywhere now, and so, easier to explain (what you see is what you change).

The listboxes in mass delete / state change dialogs are only used to confirm the lines selection.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!852

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!850

Introduce a new ERP5Site_resetAccountingTransactionLineGroupingReference
script to reset grouping reference on accounting transaction lines.

This solve a problem with the way we activated on
AccountingTransactionLine_resetGroupingReference the context of the
line, if line was removed from OFS before activity was executed, the
activity was discarded and grouping references on related lines was not
reset.

Also drop the unused `keep_if_valid_group` parameter, it was not making
sense.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!849

Also, make some existing sanitation happen earlier than before, to store
values in a cleaner format.