- 11 Jul, 2024 40 commits
-
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
If there's an error during the --save setup, we don't need to run the --load steps, because test failed already and if they don't fail in --load step, it would be a case where some errors are not reported.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Usually we run tests with two nodes, so when there's a conflict it's always between the "main" node and the processing node, so we always have a distributing node during conflict. But when running with, for example, 2 nodes (the main node + 2 nodes), the conflict might occur between the two processing nodes and after the resolution we still don't have a distributing node.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
When looking up a document by reference, using getDocumentValueList from the context of a web site / web section might not find the documents, depending on the predicates defined on the web site / web section.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This gadget looks up a document by reference, by using getDocumentValueList on the context of the web section. getDocumentValueList also applies the criterions from the context, but because web page references are already unique, adding more criterions can just cause the document to be not found and the gadget to display the "No document" error.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This sort was based on the id of the role definition but this did not work when the type definition had more than 10 documents, because: >>> sorted(['1', '2', '10']) ['1', '10', '2'] This switches to an approach of converting the id to integer, with a fallback in case the id generator is customized.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
cause by nexedi/erp5!1726
-
Jérome Perrin authored
use calendar module and public DateTime API instead.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This ensures that we don't break more.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
We have code depending on these attributes, they were used in pattern like this: ```py try: DateTime(user_input) except DateTime.DateError: error("invalid date") ``` so it's safer to keep the attributes for now, since we are already patching a lot
-
Jérome Perrin authored
We have too much code depending on this behavior, so we keep this patch for now.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
By using iso format we create dates in UTC timezone
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is a context manager which temporary allow to change the time zone. It is not thread safe and intended to be used in tests only, to replace setTimeZoneToUTC and setTimezone methods by something unified which makes the transition to DateTime 4 easier, because changing timezone was done by patching private attributes and the DateTime 4 use different attributes.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Use calendar module instead. These API depends on current locale, but we don't set the locale in ERP5, so these remain in English
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is just hiding problem and does not seem needed.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The changes from ae15e7e1 (accounting: show the context when showing invalid bank accounts, 2022-12-21) were a regression because with the previous behaviour, by just looking at the transactions, users could see with the ??? that something was wrong with the bank account. After these changes they had to open the select element. This restore somehow the previous behaviour by displaying the label with ??? marker, but since we have the label, we display the label (bank account reference) instead of the value (the relative URL)
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This was working only with Organisations
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The only check with accounting transactions regarding bank account was that the bank account is not invalidated. This makes the constraint more strict by checking that the bank account belongs to the corresponding entity and also that the bank account is validated. A few tests needed to be updated to validate the bank accounts. Also a legacy sequence test has been removed because it is now covered by normal tests.
-