- 06 Oct, 2016 23 commits
-
-
Bryce Johnson authored
-
Bryce Johnson authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Fatih Acet authored
MergeRequest new form load diff asynchronously ## What does this MR do? Don't return diff tab content from the server when request for a new merge request ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? To avoid 502 errors due to this controller action takes to much time ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Relates #13912 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - ~~[ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - ~~[ ] API support added~~ - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5844
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix broken handling of certain calls in GitHub importer client ## What does this MR do? It changes/fixes the behavior of request handling in GH client. Now it returns the response directly if it's not a collection of resources. Otherwise, it checks for a passed block, if true, then it yield each page to said block, if not, it collects all response in a single array then returns it. Closes #22998 See merge request !6703
-
Robert Speicher authored
API: Use Grape DSL to document access requests and members endpoints Part of #21979, depends on gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!6267 and gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!6266. See merge request !6269
-
Rémy Coutable authored
See !6096.
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Issue Board API support ## What does this MR do? Adds support for Issue Board in the API. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ~~Double check whether the Issue Board list movement fix is needed.~~ *Moved to a separate issue.* [#22890](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22890) ## Why was this MR needed? Currently the API offers partial support to a project's Issue Board indirectly through Labels. This MR adds support for listing, creating, moving and removing board lists. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [X] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [X] API support added - Tests - [X] Added for this feature/bug - [X] All builds are passing - [X] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [X] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? [#22195](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22195) See merge request !6646
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Gitlab::Redis bigger connection pool on sidekiq workers See merge request !6657
-
Paco Guzman authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Document GIT_STRATEGY=none ## What does this MR do? Adds documentation for the new `GIT_STRATEGY=none` option in GitLab Runner v1.7 ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Speling and grammar, of course. I'm using the term 'project workspace' to refer to the build directory, which is a Jenkins-ism. Is there preferred alternative wording? ## Why was this MR needed? Discoverability of new feature ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - <strike>[ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added</strike> - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - <strike>[ ] API support added</strike> - <strike>Tests</strike> - <strike>[ ] Added for this feature/bug</strike> - <strike>[ ] All builds are passing</strike> - <strike>[ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)</strike> - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21337 Depends on http://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner/merge_requests/332 See merge request !6577
-
Ahmad Sherif authored
Closes #22998
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Add more info in Cycle Analytics docs - Clarify the Plan to Code stages in Cycle Analytics docs based on feedback https://about.gitlab.com/2016/09/21/cycle-analytics-feature-highlight/#comment-2915715168 - Add a workflow example See merge request !6562
-
Paco Guzman authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Improve asynchronous pipeline processing ## What does this MR do? This MR improves asynchronous processing of pipeline. ## Why was this MR needed? It eliminates some race conditions and improves performance. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing ## What are the relevant issue / merge request numbers? Related merge request: !6410 Extracted from !6411 See merge request !6650
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Don't allow flay to fail. It's passing now so there's no reason to have it set to allow failure anymore. See merge request !6707
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Connor Shea authored
-
- 05 Oct, 2016 17 commits
-
-
Nick Thomas authored
[ci skip]
-
Fatih Acet authored
Prevent flash alert text from being obscured when container is fluid ## What does this MR do? Fixes [a regression](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/a2af7790) that causes the text within server-initiated flash *alerts* (not flash *notices*) to be obscured when `.container-fluid` is applied. It was reported in relation to a cherry-picking flash alert, but the problem occurs with all server-initiated flash alerts contained by a fluid container. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Note that as part of this fix, I combined some duplicate code and removed `.flash-text` & `.content-wrapper` selectors as they didn't seem to be necessary. I manually tested JS-initiated Flash alerts to make sure this doesn't affect their appearance. I also grepped around for anything else that might depend on these styles. Everything checked out. But... can *you* see something this is going to break? ## Why was this MR needed? Affected users can't read flash alerts. ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.38_PM](/uploads/af258585e428d82dc2b293434661790b/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.38_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.47_PM](/uploads/75a93235440e2b83088e66bbe53d6cee/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.47_PM.png) JS-initiated flash alert (unaffected): ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.39.57_PM](/uploads/ba678cfaeb09c639499059712a33abe8/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.39.57_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22915 cc: @jschatz1 See merge request !6694
-
Fatih Acet authored
Updated issuable form with GL dropdowns ## What does this MR do? This adds back in the GL dropdowns into the issuable form but fixes a lot of usability issues & bugs. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19879, #19882, #19881, #19883, #19880 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.09](/uploads/f1df758b3fb59958b4e6b62960b81bfb/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.09.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.13](/uploads/6e4fd8f4d874b14eaab6b10752a19df4/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.13.png) See merge request !5293
-
Fatih Acet authored
fix group links 404 ### What does this MR do? This MR should fix the 404 page, when creating a new group links without selecting any group from the group dropdown list. ### What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20766 See merge request !6155
-
Fatih Acet authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Correctly parse the date of artifact expiring ## What does this MR do? Previously the JS was just replacing `-` with `/` however this was breaking when there is a timezone offset. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19600 See merge request !6697
-
Marc Siegfriedt authored
add docs and tests - add additional validation allow move without content updated response
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Cleanup config/routes.rb even further by extracting more routes into separate files Next step after https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6692 See merge request !6698
-
Fatih Acet authored
# Conflicts: # app/assets/javascripts/dispatcher.js
-
Fatih Acet authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
See !6474.
-
Fatih Acet authored
added 245px max height and overflow scroll-y to .grouped-pipeline-dropdown ## What does this MR do? It restricts the sub builds popup in the pipeline graph and makes it scrollable ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? none that I know of ## Why was this MR needed? To restrict crazy CI configurations from messing with the viewport scrolling. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![2016-10-05_16.29.35](/uploads/0ce1d8e4d46ec45e181919dd968a80cf/2016-10-05_16.29.35.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22295 See merge request !6696
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
19499 Update project dropdowns ## What does this MR do? Separates dropdowns on project homepage and makes caret icon consistent. ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-04_at_6.20.27_PM](/uploads/76823e3836db43a60cfcabd67940659f/Screen_Shot_2016-10-04_at_6.20.27_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-04_at_6.19.52_PM](/uploads/164e40e1788b1d6a8aed29ab3348370a/Screen_Shot_2016-10-04_at_6.19.52_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19499 See merge request !6687
-
Andre Guedes authored
- Includes documentation and tests
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Refactor TrendingProjectsFinder to support caching ## What does this MR do? This refactors `TrendingProjectsFinder` so it can support caching of the data. See cb7d398972d786ba7133418266fa34ae641b2497 for more details. ## Why was this MR needed? Trending projects is quite slow, easily taking seconds to load the entire page. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22164 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/milestones/4, in particular the section "Trending page under 2s" See merge request !6672
-