- 13 Sep, 2002 4 commits
-
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
never imported log or zLOG.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
changed and the hotshot invocation wasn't changed along. Untested.
-
- 12 Sep, 2002 12 commits
-
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
Add a send_call() method that computes a new msgid and hands the message off to the smac layer. Uses __msgid_lock() call() still uses __call_lock, but callAsync() does not. callAsync() does not use any lock beyond what send_call() does.
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
each time round the loop (with a 30 sec. timeout).
-
Guido van Rossum authored
should fix the problem that messages from different processes or threads could be intermingled. The code was rewritten to build up the lines of the error message in a list which is joined by "\n" characters at the end.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
values that connect_ex() may return when we're connected). This seems to resolve the last hangs observed on Win2K. There are still (unrelated) hangs on Win98 though.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
read-write connection is not available. This refactors ClientStorage.notifyConnected() into two functions, testConnection() and notifyConnected(). testConnection creates the RPC stub and calls the register() method; it returns the stub plus a flag indicating whether this connection was preferred or sub-optimal. If the register() method raises ReadOnlyError, and the new option read_only_fallback was true on the ClientStorage constructor, it is retried with its read_only argument set to 1, and the stub is returned with the sub-optimal flag. notifyConnected() now receives the stub returned by testConnection(), and starts the verification as before. XXX The read_only_fallback feature is not yet tested. XXX More work is needed; when a suboptimal connection is used, the ConnectThread must stay around trying to get a preferred connection, and then it must switch connections on the ClientStorage (how???).
-
Guido van Rossum authored
different classes that both define a register() method, with different signatures. Rename StorageServer.register() to register_connection(). Also rename its newConnection() method to new_connection(), for naming consistency.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
more understandable. Got rid of the Connected() exception -- connect(), now renamed to try_connect(), returns a 1/0 result instead of raising Connected() to indicate success.
-
- 11 Sep, 2002 15 commits
-
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
in reST. I'm not going to figure out how to turn this into a reST table.
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
the client. Also, simplify the test for exceptions received by the client. If the class is a subclass of Exception, there's no need to ask if the instance is of type ClassType.
-
Barry Warsaw authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
Increase the timeout from 10 to 30 seconds and add a message to the failIf() call.
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
lock. The lock is now never held for a long time, only while self.thread is being assigned or inspected, and while a thread is being created, started or stopped. Waiting for an event or joining a thread is now done without holding the lock. There is no longer a fear of AttributeError. When a thread join doesn't succeed within 30 seconds, a message is logged, and depending on the situation, the join is retried.
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
The old code would avoid hosing the system when the first jar failed during its finish. The logic is that the failure means that transaction did not commit, so it was safe for all the other jars to abort. There are counter-examples to this assumption. For example, ZEO could fail after commiting the transaction on the server but before communicating that success to the client. It would lead to inconsistency if the other jars aborted after the first committed. The solution is to reduce the special case yet further: If a single-jar transaction fails during the finish, assume the transaction is aborted and avoid hosage. If the jar actually committed, it's possible to get back to a consistent state since only one jar was involved.
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
The effect of this change will be to cause transactions to fail immediately, rather than the first time they call store() or abortVersion() or some other write-method. Since the Connection now treats empty transactions as a special case, this change will not change the class of transactions that fail.
-
- 10 Sep, 2002 9 commits
-
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
parenthesis.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
test suite. The address is now found as the _addr attribute of the client storage instance.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
the BuddyCacheSimulation constructor to round up the cachelimit so that it reports the actual value used.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
to print some information. Use -s to print size histograms. This is pretty raw. It prints two tables: one for writes, one for loads.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
keeping track of the beginning and end address of all free blocks, to make merging of adjacent blocks a breeze. The free list is no longer kept sorted order. Unfortunately, this still performs poorly. It has a higher hit rate (with the 38 minute trace I'm using; the longer traces take too long) than the buddy system allocator with the same arena size, it is *much* slower, the memory usage is under 20% (!!!), and despite a roving pointer, the allocation loop is taken an average of 692 times per allocation. At the end of the simulation the free list contains 1039 blocks; I presume this is a steady state approximating the average behavior. (There are 2280 allocated blocks at that point, roughly confirming Knuth's "50% rule" and suggesting that the block merge code works properly.) I guess the next idea is separate free lists per size.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-