Commit 84a1c4a2 authored by Patrick Gerken's avatar Patrick Gerken

Better check of "in" support

To be sure that "in" is supported
I'd have to check for multiple possible
builtin attributes. Instead I do a try 
except.
parent 9d23bdab
...@@ -541,9 +541,12 @@ class BaseRequest: ...@@ -541,9 +541,12 @@ class BaseRequest:
hasattr(parents[1], 'aq_base') and hasattr(parents[1], 'aq_base') and
not hasattr(parents[1],'__bobo_traverse__')): not hasattr(parents[1],'__bobo_traverse__')):
base = parents[1].aq_base base = parents[1].aq_base
if not (hasattr(base, entry_name) or if not hasattr(base, entry_name):
(hasattr(base, '__iter__') and entry_name in base)): try:
raise AttributeError(entry_name) if not entry_name in base:
raise AttributeError(entry_name)
except TypeError:
raise AttributeError(entry_name)
# After traversal post traversal hooks aren't available anymore # After traversal post traversal hooks aren't available anymore
del self._post_traverse del self._post_traverse
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment