Commit 05179d52 authored by Benjamin Peterson's avatar Benjamin Peterson

use source role instead of linking to svn

parent 3d1f2d3b
...@@ -96,9 +96,9 @@ For objects, the machinery is in :meth:`object.__getattribute__` which ...@@ -96,9 +96,9 @@ For objects, the machinery is in :meth:`object.__getattribute__` which
transforms ``b.x`` into ``type(b).__dict__['x'].__get__(b, type(b))``. The transforms ``b.x`` into ``type(b).__dict__['x'].__get__(b, type(b))``. The
implementation works through a precedence chain that gives data descriptors implementation works through a precedence chain that gives data descriptors
priority over instance variables, instance variables priority over non-data priority over instance variables, instance variables priority over non-data
descriptors, and assigns lowest priority to :meth:`__getattr__` if provided. The descriptors, and assigns lowest priority to :meth:`__getattr__` if provided.
full C implementation can be found in :c:func:`PyObject_GenericGetAttr()` in The full C implementation can be found in :c:func:`PyObject_GenericGetAttr()` in
`Objects/object.c <http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Objects/object.c?view=markup>`_\. :source:`Objects/object.c`.
For classes, the machinery is in :meth:`type.__getattribute__` which transforms For classes, the machinery is in :meth:`type.__getattribute__` which transforms
``B.x`` into ``B.__dict__['x'].__get__(None, B)``. In pure Python, it looks ``B.x`` into ``B.__dict__['x'].__get__(None, B)``. In pure Python, it looks
...@@ -131,9 +131,7 @@ search using :meth:`object.__getattribute__`. ...@@ -131,9 +131,7 @@ search using :meth:`object.__getattribute__`.
Note, in Python 2.2, ``super(B, obj).m()`` would only invoke :meth:`__get__` if Note, in Python 2.2, ``super(B, obj).m()`` would only invoke :meth:`__get__` if
``m`` was a data descriptor. In Python 2.3, non-data descriptors also get ``m`` was a data descriptor. In Python 2.3, non-data descriptors also get
invoked unless an old-style class is involved. The implementation details are invoked unless an old-style class is involved. The implementation details are
in :c:func:`super_getattro()` in in :c:func:`super_getattro()` in :source:`Objects/typeobject.c`.
`Objects/typeobject.c <http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Objects/typeobject.c?view=markup>`_
and a pure Python equivalent can be found in `Guido's Tutorial`_.
.. _`Guido's Tutorial`: http://www.python.org/2.2.3/descrintro.html#cooperation .. _`Guido's Tutorial`: http://www.python.org/2.2.3/descrintro.html#cooperation
...@@ -308,10 +306,9 @@ Running the interpreter shows how the function descriptor works in practice:: ...@@ -308,10 +306,9 @@ Running the interpreter shows how the function descriptor works in practice::
The output suggests that bound and unbound methods are two different types. The output suggests that bound and unbound methods are two different types.
While they could have been implemented that way, the actual C implementation of While they could have been implemented that way, the actual C implementation of
:c:type:`PyMethod_Type` in :c:type:`PyMethod_Type` in :source:`Objects/classobject.c` is a single object
`Objects/classobject.c <http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Objects/classobject.c?view=markup>`_ with two different representations depending on whether the :attr:`im_self`
is a single object with two different representations depending on whether the field is set or is *NULL* (the C equivalent of *None*).
:attr:`im_self` field is set or is *NULL* (the C equivalent of *None*).
Likewise, the effects of calling a method object depend on the :attr:`im_self` Likewise, the effects of calling a method object depend on the :attr:`im_self`
field. If set (meaning bound), the original function (stored in the field. If set (meaning bound), the original function (stored in the
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment