Commit 091e95e9 authored by Wolfgang Maier's avatar Wolfgang Maier Committed by Raymond Hettinger

bpo-33203: Ensure random.choice always raises IndexError on empty sequence (GH-6338)

parent 74940913
......@@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ class Random(_random.Random):
"enough bits to choose from a population range this large.\n"
"To remove the range limitation, add a getrandbits() method.")
return int(random() * n)
if n == 0:
raise ValueError("Boundary cannot be zero")
rem = maxsize % n
limit = (maxsize - rem) / maxsize # int(limit * maxsize) % n == 0
r = random()
......
......@@ -651,7 +651,10 @@ class MersenneTwister_TestBasicOps(TestBasicOps, unittest.TestCase):
# Population range too large (n >= maxsize)
self.gen._randbelow(maxsize+1, maxsize = maxsize)
self.gen._randbelow(5640, maxsize = maxsize)
# issue 33203: test that _randbelow raises ValueError on
# n == 0 also in its getrandbits-independent branch.
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
self.gen._randbelow(0, maxsize=maxsize)
# This might be going too far to test a single line, but because of our
# noble aim of achieving 100% test coverage we need to write a case in
# which the following line in Random._randbelow() gets executed:
......
``random.Random.choice()`` now raises ``IndexError`` for empty sequences
consistently even when called from subclasses without a ``getrandbits()``
implementation.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment