Commit 2b93c4c7 authored by Tim Peters's avatar Tim Peters

Updated the INST/OBJ docs, to say they really are (almost) identical

in 2.3.
parent d01c1e91
......@@ -1614,6 +1614,8 @@ opcodes = [
the class object obtained from INST's arguments is applied to the
argtuple obtained from the stack, and the resulting instance object
is pushed on the stack.
NOTE: checks for __safe_for_unpickling__ went away in Python 2.3.
"""),
I(name='OBJ',
......@@ -1643,6 +1645,10 @@ opcodes = [
except that no __safe_for_unpickling__ check is done (XXX this is
a bug; cPickle does test __safe_for_unpickling__). See INST for
the gory details.
NOTE: In Python 2.3, INST and OBJ are identical except for how they
get the class object. That was always the intent; the implementations
had diverged for accidental reasons.
"""),
I(name='NEWOBJ',
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment