Commit 6afd11c7 authored by Antoine Pitrou's avatar Antoine Pitrou

Issue #14456: improve documentation of the signal module w.r.t. threads.

parent f70401e8
...@@ -5,46 +5,58 @@ ...@@ -5,46 +5,58 @@
:synopsis: Set handlers for asynchronous events. :synopsis: Set handlers for asynchronous events.
This module provides mechanisms to use signal handlers in Python. Some general This module provides mechanisms to use signal handlers in Python.
rules for working with signals and their handlers:
* A handler for a particular signal, once set, remains installed until it is General rules
explicitly reset (Python emulates the BSD style interface regardless of the -------------
underlying implementation), with the exception of the handler for
:const:`SIGCHLD`, which follows the underlying implementation. The :func:`signal.signal` function allows to define custom handlers to be
executed when a signal is received. A small number of default handlers are
* There is no way to "block" signals temporarily from critical sections (since installed: :const:`SIGPIPE` is ignored (so write errors on pipes and sockets
this is not supported by all Unix flavors). can be reported as ordinary Python exceptions) and :const:`SIGINT` is
translated into a :exc:`KeyboardInterrupt` exception.
* Although Python signal handlers are called asynchronously as far as the Python
user is concerned, they can only occur between the "atomic" instructions of the A handler for a particular signal, once set, remains installed until it is
Python interpreter. This means that signals arriving during long calculations explicitly reset (Python emulates the BSD style interface regardless of the
implemented purely in C (such as regular expression matches on large bodies of underlying implementation), with the exception of the handler for
text) may be delayed for an arbitrary amount of time. :const:`SIGCHLD`, which follows the underlying implementation.
* When a signal arrives during an I/O operation, it is possible that the I/O There is no way to "block" signals temporarily from critical sections (since
operation raises an exception after the signal handler returns. This is this is not supported by all Unix flavors).
dependent on the underlying Unix system's semantics regarding interrupted system
calls.
Execution of Python signal handlers
* Because the C signal handler always returns, it makes little sense to catch ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
synchronous errors like :const:`SIGFPE` or :const:`SIGSEGV`.
A Python signal handler does not get executed inside the low-level (C) signal
* Python installs a small number of signal handlers by default: :const:`SIGPIPE` handler. Instead, the low-level signal handler sets a flag which tells the
is ignored (so write errors on pipes and sockets can be reported as ordinary :term:`virtual machine` to execute the corresponding Python signal handler
Python exceptions) and :const:`SIGINT` is translated into a at a later point(for example at the next :term:`bytecode` instruction).
:exc:`KeyboardInterrupt` exception. All of these can be overridden. This has consequences:
* Some care must be taken if both signals and threads are used in the same * It makes little sense to catch synchronous errors like :const:`SIGFPE` or
program. The fundamental thing to remember in using signals and threads :const:`SIGSEGV`.
simultaneously is: always perform :func:`signal` operations in the main thread
of execution. Any thread can perform an :func:`alarm`, :func:`getsignal`, * A long-running calculation implemented purely in C (such as regular
:func:`pause`, :func:`setitimer` or :func:`getitimer`; only the main thread expression matching on a large body of text) may run uninterrupted for an
can set a new signal handler, and the main thread will be the only one to arbitrary amount of time, regardless of any signals received. The Python
receive signals (this is enforced by the Python :mod:`signal` module, even signal handlers will be called when the calculation finishes.
if the underlying thread implementation supports sending signals to
individual threads). This means that signals can't be used as a means of
inter-thread communication. Use locks instead. Signals and threads
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Python signal handlers are always executed in the main Python thread,
even if the signal was received in another thread. This means that signals
can't be used as a means of inter-thread communication. You can use
the synchronization primitives from the :mod:`threading` module instead.
Besides, only the main thread is allowed to set a new signal handler.
Module contents
---------------
The variables defined in the :mod:`signal` module are: The variables defined in the :mod:`signal` module are:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment