Commit 71ccaa5d authored by Tim Peters's avatar Tim Peters

k_mul() comments: Explained why there's always enough room to subtract

ah*bh and al*bl.  This is much easier than explaining why that's true
for (ah+al)*(bh+bl), and follows directly from the simple part of the
(ah+al)*(bh+bl) explanation.
parent 3f3b0ebf
......@@ -1791,6 +1791,13 @@ remaining, and that's obviously plenty to hold 2*shift+2 digits + 2 bits.
Else (bsize is odd and asize < bsize) ah and al each have at most shift digits,
so ah+al has at most shift digits + 1 bit, and (ah+al)*(bh+bl) has at most
2*shift+1 digits + 2 bits, and again 2*shift+2 digits is enough to hold it.
Note that the "lazy" analysis is enough to show that there's always enough
room to subtract al*bl and ah*bh. al and bl each have no more than shift
digits, so al*bl has no more than 2*shift, so there's at least one digit
to spare in the remaining allocated digits. The same is true for ah*bh when
bsize is even. When bsize is odd, ah*bh has at most 2*shift+2 digits, and
there are at least that many remaining allocated digits when bsize is odd.
*/
/* b has at least twice the digits of a, and a is big enough that Karatsuba
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment