Commit 9511ba1d authored by Berker Peksag's avatar Berker Peksag

Issue #21590: Silence Sphinx warnings in instrumentation.rst

WARNING: Could not lex literal_block as "c". Highlighting skipped.

Patch by SilentGhost.
parent 66db0a32
.. highlight:: shell-session
.. _instrumentation:
===============================================
......@@ -20,9 +22,6 @@ known as "probes", that can be observed by a DTrace or SystemTap script,
making it easier to monitor what the CPython processes on a system are
doing.
.. I'm using ".. code-block:: c" for SystemTap scripts, as "c" is syntactically
the closest match that Sphinx supports
.. impl-detail::
DTrace markers are implementation details of the CPython interpreter.
......@@ -40,14 +39,16 @@ development tools must be installed.
On a Linux machine, this can be done via::
yum install systemtap-sdt-devel
$ yum install systemtap-sdt-devel
or::
sudo apt-get install systemtap-sdt-dev
$ sudo apt-get install systemtap-sdt-dev
CPython must then be configured ``--with-dtrace``:
CPython must then be configured `--with-dtrace`::
.. code-block:: none
checking for --with-dtrace... yes
......@@ -71,22 +72,18 @@ Python provider::
On Linux, you can verify if the SystemTap static markers are present in
the built binary by seeing if it contains a ".note.stapsdt" section.
.. code-block:: bash
::
$ readelf -S ./python | grep .note.stapsdt
[30] .note.stapsdt NOTE 0000000000000000 00308d78
If you've built Python as a shared library (with --enable-shared), you
need to look instead within the shared library. For example:
.. code-block:: bash
need to look instead within the shared library. For example::
$ readelf -S libpython3.3dm.so.1.0 | grep .note.stapsdt
[29] .note.stapsdt NOTE 0000000000000000 00365b68
Sufficiently modern readelf can print the metadata:
.. code-block:: bash
Sufficiently modern readelf can print the metadata::
$ readelf -n ./python
......@@ -136,7 +133,7 @@ hierarchy of a Python script, only tracing within the invocation of
a function called "start". In other words, import-time function
invocations are not going to be listed:
.. code-block:: c
.. code-block:: none
self int indent;
......@@ -170,13 +167,13 @@ invocations are not going to be listed:
self->trace = 0;
}
It can be invoked like this:
.. code-block:: bash
It can be invoked like this::
$ sudo dtrace -q -s call_stack.d -c "python3.6 script.py"
The output looks like this::
The output looks like this:
.. code-block:: none
156641360502280 function-entry:call_stack.py:start:23
156641360518804 function-entry: call_stack.py:function_1:1
......@@ -208,7 +205,7 @@ containing them.
For example, this SystemTap script can be used to show the call/return
hierarchy of a Python script:
.. code-block:: c
.. code-block:: none
probe process("python").mark("function__entry") {
filename = user_string($arg1);
......@@ -228,15 +225,15 @@ hierarchy of a Python script:
thread_indent(-1), funcname, filename, lineno);
}
It can be invoked like this:
.. code-block:: bash
It can be invoked like this::
$ stap \
show-call-hierarchy.stp \
-c "./python test.py"
The output looks like this::
The output looks like this:
.. code-block:: none
11408 python(8274): => __contains__ in Lib/_abcoll.py:362
11414 python(8274): => __getitem__ in Lib/os.py:425
......@@ -325,7 +322,7 @@ details of the static markers.
Here is a tapset file, based on a non-shared build of CPython:
.. code-block:: c
.. code-block:: none
/*
Provide a higher-level wrapping around the function__entry and
......@@ -369,7 +366,7 @@ This SystemTap script uses the tapset above to more cleanly implement the
example given above of tracing the Python function-call hierarchy, without
needing to directly name the static markers:
.. code-block:: c
.. code-block:: none
probe python.function.entry
{
......@@ -388,7 +385,7 @@ The following script uses the tapset above to provide a top-like view of all
running CPython code, showing the top 20 most frequently-entered bytecode
frames, each second, across the whole system:
.. code-block:: c
.. code-block:: none
global fn_calls;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment