Commit 9a29fe4c authored by Georg Brandl's avatar Georg Brandl

Argh. "integer" is a very confusing word ;)

Actually, checking for INT_MAX and INT_MIN is correct since
the format code explicitly handles a C "int".
parent aeb2504c
......@@ -213,9 +213,6 @@ What's New in Python 2.5 alpha 2?
Core and builtins
-----------------
- Bug #1502750: Check bounds integer arguments correctly on 64-bit
platforms.
- Bug #1465834: 'bdist_wininst preinstall script support' was fixed
by converting these apis from macros into exported functions again:
......
......@@ -624,12 +624,12 @@ convertsimple(PyObject *arg, const char **p_format, va_list *p_va, int flags,
ival = PyInt_AsLong(arg);
if (ival == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
return converterr("integer<i>", arg, msgbuf, bufsize);
else if (ival > LONG_MAX) {
else if (ival > INT_MAX) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError,
"signed integer is greater than maximum");
return converterr("integer<i>", arg, msgbuf, bufsize);
}
else if (ival < LONG_MIN) {
else if (ival < INT_MIN) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError,
"signed integer is less than minimum");
return converterr("integer<i>", arg, msgbuf, bufsize);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment