Commit bc95973b authored by Raymond Hettinger's avatar Raymond Hettinger

Fix handling on negative numbers in ast.literal_eval().

parent 4f3abb0f
......@@ -65,19 +65,25 @@ def literal_eval(node_or_string):
elif isinstance(node, Name):
if node.id in _safe_names:
return _safe_names[node.id]
elif isinstance(node, UnaryOp) and \
isinstance(node.op, (UAdd, USub)) and \
isinstance(node.operand, (Num, UnaryOp, BinOp)):
operand = _convert(node.operand)
if isinstance(node.op, UAdd):
return + operand
else:
return - operand
elif isinstance(node, BinOp) and \
isinstance(node.op, (Add, Sub)) and \
isinstance(node.right, Num) and \
isinstance(node.right.n, complex) and \
isinstance(node.left, Num) and \
isinstance(node.left.n, (int, float)):
left = node.left.n
right = node.right.n
isinstance(node.right, (Num, UnaryOp, BinOp)) and \
isinstance(node.left, (Num, UnaryOp, BinOp)):
left = _convert(node.left)
right = _convert(node.right)
if isinstance(node.op, Add):
return left + right
else:
return left - right
raise ValueError('malformed string')
raise ValueError('malformed node or string: ' + repr(node))
return _convert(node_or_string)
......
......@@ -288,12 +288,14 @@ class ASTHelpers_Test(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(ast.literal_eval('{1, 2, 3}'), {1, 2, 3})
self.assertEqual(ast.literal_eval('b"hi"'), b"hi")
self.assertRaises(ValueError, ast.literal_eval, 'foo()')
self.assertEqual(ast.literal_eval('-6'), -6)
self.assertEqual(ast.literal_eval('-6j+3'), 3-6j)
self.assertEqual(ast.literal_eval('3.25'), 3.25)
def test_literal_eval_issue4907(self):
self.assertEqual(ast.literal_eval('2j'), 2j)
self.assertEqual(ast.literal_eval('10 + 2j'), 10 + 2j)
self.assertEqual(ast.literal_eval('1.5 - 2j'), 1.5 - 2j)
self.assertRaises(ValueError, ast.literal_eval, '2 + (3 + 4j)')
def test_main():
......
......@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ What's New in Python 3.2 Alpha 3?
Core and Builtins
-----------------
- ast.literal_eval() can now handle negative numbers. It is also a little
more liberal in what it accepts without compromising the safety of the
evaluation. For example, 3j+4 and 3+4+5 are both accepted.
- Issue #10006: type.__abstractmethods__ now raises an AttributeError. As a
result metaclasses can now be ABCs (see #9533).
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment