Commit c14db5ec authored by Guido van Rossum's avatar Guido van Rossum

Fix SF bug #489581: __slots__ leak.

It was easier than I thought, assuming that no other things contribute
to the instance size besides slots -- a pretty good bet.  With a test
suite, no less!
parent 402f5d9f
...@@ -1000,6 +1000,40 @@ def slots(): ...@@ -1000,6 +1000,40 @@ def slots():
vereq(x.b, 2) vereq(x.b, 2)
vereq(x.c, 3) vereq(x.c, 3)
# Test leaks
class Counted(object):
counter = 0 # counts the number of instances alive
def __init__(self):
Counted.counter += 1
def __del__(self):
Counted.counter -= 1
class C(object):
__slots__ = ['a', 'b', 'c']
x = C()
x.a = Counted()
x.b = Counted()
x.c = Counted()
vereq(Counted.counter, 3)
del x
vereq(Counted.counter, 0)
class D(C):
pass
x = D()
x.a = Counted()
x.z = Counted()
vereq(Counted.counter, 2)
del x
vereq(Counted.counter, 0)
class E(D):
__slots__ = ['e']
x = E()
x.a = Counted()
x.z = Counted()
x.e = Counted()
vereq(Counted.counter, 3)
del x
vereq(Counted.counter, 0)
def dynamics(): def dynamics():
if verbose: print "Testing class attribute propagation..." if verbose: print "Testing class attribute propagation..."
class D(object): class D(object):
......
...@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ XXX Release date: ??-Dec-2001 XXX ...@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ XXX Release date: ??-Dec-2001 XXX
Type/class unification and new-style classes Type/class unification and new-style classes
- Fixed a leak: instance variables declared with __slots__ were never
deleted!
- The "delete attribute" method of descriptor objects is called - The "delete attribute" method of descriptor objects is called
__delete__, not __del__. In previous releases, it was mistakenly __delete__, not __del__. In previous releases, it was mistakenly
called __del__, which created an unfortunate overloading condition called __del__, which created an unfortunate overloading condition
......
...@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ call_finalizer(PyObject *self) ...@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ call_finalizer(PyObject *self)
static void static void
subtype_dealloc(PyObject *self) subtype_dealloc(PyObject *self)
{ {
PyTypeObject *type, *base; PyTypeObject *type, *base, *temp;
destructor f; destructor f;
/* This exists so we can DECREF self->ob_type */ /* This exists so we can DECREF self->ob_type */
...@@ -314,10 +314,30 @@ subtype_dealloc(PyObject *self) ...@@ -314,10 +314,30 @@ subtype_dealloc(PyObject *self)
/* Find the nearest base with a different tp_dealloc */ /* Find the nearest base with a different tp_dealloc */
type = self->ob_type; type = self->ob_type;
base = type->tp_base; base = type;
while ((f = base->tp_dealloc) == subtype_dealloc) { while ((f = base->tp_dealloc) == subtype_dealloc) {
temp = base;
base = base->tp_base; base = base->tp_base;
assert(base); assert(base);
/* While we're at it, clear __slots__ variables */
if (temp->tp_basicsize != base->tp_basicsize &&
temp->tp_itemsize == 0)
{
char *addr = ((char *)self);
char *p = addr + base->tp_basicsize;
char *q = addr + temp->tp_basicsize;
for (; p < q; p += sizeof(PyObject *)) {
PyObject **pp;
if (p == addr + type->tp_dictoffset ||
p == addr + type->tp_weaklistoffset)
continue;
pp = (PyObject **)p;
if (*pp != NULL) {
Py_DECREF(*pp);
*pp = NULL;
}
}
}
} }
/* If we added a dict, DECREF it */ /* If we added a dict, DECREF it */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment