Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
C
cpython
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
cpython
Commits
d84b29f8
Commit
d84b29f8
authored
Aug 07, 2015
by
Robert Collins
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Issue #4395: Better testing and documentation of binary operators.
Patch by Martin Panter.
parent
159fbdd8
Changes
3
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
with
38 additions
and
10 deletions
+38
-10
Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
+13
-9
Lib/test/test_binop.py
Lib/test/test_binop.py
+22
-1
Misc/NEWS
Misc/NEWS
+3
-0
No files found.
Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
View file @
d84b29f8
...
...
@@ -1266,10 +1266,14 @@ Basic customization
context (e.g., in the condition of an ``if`` statement), Python will call
:func:`bool` on the value to determine if the result is true or false.
There are no implied relationships among the comparison operators. The truth
of ``x==y`` does not imply that ``x!=y`` is false. Accordingly, when
defining :meth:`__eq__`, one should also define :meth:`__ne__` so that the
operators will behave as expected. See the paragraph on :meth:`__hash__` for
By default, :meth:`__ne__` delegates to :meth:`__eq__` and
inverts the result unless it is ``NotImplemented``. There are no other
implied relationships among the comparison operators, for example,
the truth of ``(x<y or x==y)`` does not imply ``x<=y``.
To automatically generate ordering operations from a single root operation,
see :func:`functools.total_ordering`.
See the paragraph on :meth:`__hash__` for
some important notes on creating :term:`hashable` objects which support
custom comparison operations and are usable as dictionary keys.
...
...
@@ -1278,11 +1282,11 @@ Basic customization
rather, :meth:`__lt__` and :meth:`__gt__` are each other's reflection,
:meth:`__le__` and :meth:`__ge__` are each other's reflection, and
:meth:`__eq__` and :meth:`__ne__` are their own reflection.
Arguments to rich comparison methods are never coerced.
To automatically generate ordering operations from a single root operation,
see :func:`functools.total_ordering`
.
If the operands are of different types, and right operand's type is
a direct or indirect subclass of the left operand's type,
the reflected method of the right operand has priority, otherwise
the left operand's method has priority. Virtual subclassing is
not considered
.
.. method:: object.__hash__(self)
...
...
Lib/test/test_binop.py
View file @
d84b29f8
...
...
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
import
unittest
from
test
import
support
from
operator
import
eq
,
ne
,
lt
,
gt
,
le
,
ge
from
abc
import
ABCMeta
def
gcd
(
a
,
b
):
"""Greatest common divisor using Euclid's algorithm."""
...
...
@@ -332,7 +333,7 @@ class A(OperationLogger):
self
.
log_operation
(
'A.__ge__'
)
return
NotImplemented
class
B
(
OperationLogger
):
class
B
(
OperationLogger
,
metaclass
=
ABCMeta
):
def
__eq__
(
self
,
other
):
self
.
log_operation
(
'B.__eq__'
)
return
NotImplemented
...
...
@@ -354,6 +355,20 @@ class C(B):
self
.
log_operation
(
'C.__ge__'
)
return
NotImplemented
class
V
(
OperationLogger
):
"""Virtual subclass of B"""
def
__eq__
(
self
,
other
):
self
.
log_operation
(
'V.__eq__'
)
return
NotImplemented
def
__le__
(
self
,
other
):
self
.
log_operation
(
'V.__le__'
)
return
NotImplemented
def
__ge__
(
self
,
other
):
self
.
log_operation
(
'V.__ge__'
)
return
NotImplemented
B
.
register
(
V
)
class
OperationOrderTests
(
unittest
.
TestCase
):
def
test_comparison_orders
(
self
):
self
.
assertEqual
(
op_sequence
(
eq
,
A
,
A
),
[
'A.__eq__'
,
'A.__eq__'
])
...
...
@@ -369,8 +384,14 @@ class OperationOrderTests(unittest.TestCase):
self
.
assertEqual
(
op_sequence
(
le
,
B
,
C
),
[
'C.__ge__'
,
'B.__le__'
])
self
.
assertEqual
(
op_sequence
(
le
,
C
,
B
),
[
'C.__le__'
,
'B.__ge__'
])
self
.
assertTrue
(
issubclass
(
V
,
B
))
self
.
assertEqual
(
op_sequence
(
eq
,
B
,
V
),
[
'B.__eq__'
,
'V.__eq__'
])
self
.
assertEqual
(
op_sequence
(
le
,
B
,
V
),
[
'B.__le__'
,
'V.__ge__'
])
def
test_main
():
support
.
run_unittest
(
RatTestCase
,
OperationOrderTests
)
if
__name__
==
"__main__"
:
test_main
()
Misc/NEWS
View file @
d84b29f8
...
...
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ Release date: tba
Core and Builtins
-----------------
- Issue #4395: Better testing and documentation of binary operators.
Patch by Martin Panter.
- Issue #24467: Fixed possible buffer over-read in bytearray. The bytearray
object now always allocates place for trailing null byte and it'
s
buffer
now
is
always
null
-
terminated
.
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment