- 12 Aug, 2002 24 commits
-
-
Jack Jansen authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
alive in the memo. This fixes SF bug 592567.
-
Tim Peters authored
multiply via Ctrl+C could cause a NULL-pointer dereference due to the assert.
-
Tim Peters authored
the good one <wink>. Also checked in a test-aid by mistake.
-
Tim Peters authored
cases, overflow the allocated result object by 1 bit. In such cases, it would have been brought back into range if we subtracted al*bl and ah*bh from it first, but I don't want to do that because it hurts cache behavior. Instead we just ignore the excess bit when it appears -- in effect, this is forcing unsigned mod BASE**(asize + bsize) arithmetic in a case where that doesn't happen all by itself.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
1. You can now have __dict__ and/or __weakref__ in your __slots__ (before only __weakref__ was supported). This is treated differently than before: it merely sets a flag that the object should support the corresponding magic. 2. Dynamic types now always have descriptors __dict__ and __weakref__ thrust upon them. If the type in fact does not support one or the other, that descriptor's __get__ method will raise AttributeError. 3. (This is the reason for all this; it fixes SF bug 575229, reported by Cesar Douady.) Given this code: class A(object): __slots__ = [] class B(object): pass class C(A, B): __slots__ = [] the class object for C was broken; its size was less than that of B, and some descriptors on B could cause a segfault. C now correctly inherits __weakrefs__ and __dict__ from B, even though A is the "primary" base (C.__base__ is A). 4. Some code cleanup, and a few comments added.
-
Tim Peters authored
algorithm. MSVC 6 wasn't impressed <wink>. Something odd: the x_mul algorithm appears to get substantially worse than quadratic time as the inputs grow larger: bits in each input x_mul time k_mul time ------------------ ---------- ---------- 15360 0.01 0.00 30720 0.04 0.01 61440 0.16 0.04 122880 0.64 0.14 245760 2.56 0.40 491520 10.76 1.23 983040 71.28 3.69 1966080 459.31 11.07 That is, x_mul is perfectly quadratic-time until a little burp at 2.56->10.76, and after that goes to hell in a hurry. Under Karatsuba, doubling the input size "should take" 3 times longer instead of 4, and that remains the case throughout this range. I conclude that my "be nice to the cache" reworkings of k_mul() are paying.
-
Tim Peters authored
correct now, so added some final comments, did some cleanup, and enabled it for all long-int multiplies. The KARAT envar no longer matters, although I left some #if 0'ed code in there for my own use (temporary). k_mul() is still much slower than x_mul() if the inputs have very differenent sizes, and that still needs to be addressed.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
CRCs.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Tim Peters authored
(it's possible, but should be harmless -- this requires more thought, and allocating enough space in advance to prevent it requires exactly as much thought, to know exactly how much that is -- the end result certainly fits in the allocated space -- hmm, but that's really all the thought it needs! borrows/carries out of the high digits really are harmless).
-
Mark Hammond authored
-
Marc-André Lemburg authored
to use new extern macro.
-
Mark Hammond authored
Thanks to Skip Montanaro and Kalle Svensson for the patches.
-
Tim Peters authored
k_mul(): This didn't allocate enough result space when one input had more than twice as many bits as the other. This was partly hidden by that x_mul() didn't normalize its result. The Karatsuba recurrence is pretty much hosed if the inputs aren't roughly the same size. If one has at least twice as many bits as the other, we get a degenerate case where the "high half" of the smaller input is 0. Added a special case for that, for speed, but despite that it helped, this can still be much slower than the "grade school" method. It seems to take a really wild imbalance to trigger that; e.g., a 2**22-bit input times a 1000-bit input on my box runs about twice as slow under k_mul than under x_mul. This still needs to be addressed. I'm also not sure that allocating a->ob_size + b->ob_size digits is enough, given that this is computing k = (ah+al)*(bh+bl) instead of k = (ah-al)*(bl-bh); i.e., it's certainly enough for the final result, but it's vaguely possible that adding in the "artificially" large k may overflow that temporarily. If so, an assert will trigger in the debug build, but we'll probably compute the right result anyway(!).
-
Tim Peters authored
addition and subtraction. Reworked the tail end of k_mul() to use them. This saves oodles of one-shot longobject allocations (this is a triply- recursive routine, so saving one allocation in the body saves 3**n allocations at depth n; we actually save 2 allocations in the body).
-
Guido van Rossum authored
new-style object creation/deallocation. Moved all news about type/class unification and new-stype classes to a separate section at the top.
-
Neal Norwitz authored
-
Tim Peters authored
-
Tim Peters authored
-
Tim Peters authored
SF 560379: Karatsuba multiplication. Lots of things were changed from that. This needs a lot more testing, for correctness and speed, the latter especially when bit lengths are unbalanced. For now, the Karatsuba code gets invoked if and only if envar KARAT exists.
-
- 11 Aug, 2002 8 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
-
Tim Peters authored
-
Ka-Ping Yee authored
Add resolve() to handle looking up objects and names (fix SF bug 586931). Add a nicer error message when given a filename that doesn't exist.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
a lot of work, including I/O (e.g. to import warnings.py), which might affect errno.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
-
Marc-André Lemburg authored
u'%c' will now raise a ValueError in case the argument is an integer outside the valid range of Unicode code point ordinals. Closes SF bug #593581.
-
Guido van Rossum authored
currently return inconsistent results for ints and longs; in particular: hex/oct/%u/%o/%x/%X of negative short ints, and x<<n that either loses bits or changes sign. (No warnings for repr() of a long, though that will also change to lose the trailing 'L' eventually.) This introduces some warnings in the test suite; I'll take care of those later.
-
Tim Peters authored
test_del(), test_del_newclass(): No need to use apply() in these.
-
- 10 Aug, 2002 8 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
-
Tim Peters authored
in gc.garbage (so no need to loop looking for it -- it's there or it's not).
-
Tim Peters authored
the time it's called, test_saveall() made it look a leak, triggering bogus warnings from regrtest's -l (findleaks) mode.
-
Martin v. Löwis authored
Reject characters outside the locale's encoding on input.
-
Tim Peters authored
-
Mark Hammond authored
-
Guido van Rossum authored
types. This prevents nonsense like 2.__class__ = bool or True.__class__ = int.
-
Tim Peters authored
This is friendlier for caches. 2. Cut MIN_GALLOP to 7, but added a per-sort min_gallop vrbl that adapts the "get into galloping mode" threshold higher when galloping isn't paying, and lower when it is. There's no known case where this hurts. It's (of course) neutral for /sort, \sort and =sort. It also happens to be neutral for !sort. It cuts a tiny # of compares in 3sort and +sort. For *sort, it reduces the # of compares to better than what this used to do when MIN_GALLOP was hardcoded to 10 (it did about 0.1% more *sort compares before, but given how close we are to the limit, this is "a lot"!). %sort used to do about 1.5% more compares, and ~sort about 3.6% more. Here are exact counts: i *sort 3sort +sort %sort ~sort !sort 15 449235 33019 33016 51328 188720 65534 before 448885 33016 33007 50426 182083 65534 after 0.08% 0.01% 0.03% 1.79% 3.65% 0.00% %ch from after 16 963714 65824 65809 103409 377634 131070 962991 65821 65808 101667 364341 131070 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 1.71% 3.65% 0.00% 17 2059092 131413 131362 209130 755476 262142 2057533 131410 131361 206193 728871 262142 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 1.42% 3.65% 0.00% 18 4380687 262440 262460 421998 1511174 524286 4377402 262437 262459 416347 1457945 524286 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 1.36% 3.65% 0.00% 19 9285709 524581 524634 848590 3022584 1048574 9278734 524580 524633 837947 2916107 1048574 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 1.27% 3.65% 0.00% 20 19621118 1048960 1048942 1715806 6045418 2097150 19606028 1048958 1048941 1694896 5832445 2097150 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 1.23% 3.65% 0.00% 3. Added some key asserts I overlooked before. 4. Updated the doc file.
-